Children's Health Council, 650 Clark Way, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Psychol Bull. 2011 Sep;137(5):749-50. doi: 10.1037/a0024119.
Smith and Farah (2011) provided a thought-provoking and perhaps deliberately provocative literature review of the use of stimulants to improve cognitive functioning in humans. They addressed the apparently increasing willingness of individuals mostly in the United States to use stimulants for this purpose and then summarized published literature that explores whether stimulants actually improve specific aspects of neurocognitive function. Although calling for more research, they tentatively concluded that stimulants indeed may be "smart pills" for some people under certain circumstances. This comment emphasizes that they never actually defined the desired qualities of a smart pill, seemed to accept the unproven axiom that slight improvements in specific tests constitute meaningful enhancement of intelligence, and failed to consider the possible costs to individuals and to society of promoting the use of this class of medications for such a purpose.
史密斯和法雷(2011 年)提供了一篇发人深省,甚至可能是故意挑衅的文献综述,探讨了使用兴奋剂来提高人类认知功能的问题。他们探讨了个人,主要是美国个人,越来越愿意出于此目的使用兴奋剂的现象,然后总结了已发表的文献,探讨了兴奋剂是否真的能改善神经认知功能的特定方面。尽管他们呼吁进行更多的研究,但他们暂时得出结论,兴奋剂在某些情况下可能对某些人来说是“聪明药”。这一评论强调了他们实际上从未定义过理想的“聪明药”的特性,似乎接受了未经证实的假设,即特定测试中的轻微改善构成了智力的有意义提升,并且没有考虑到为了这个目的而推广使用这类药物可能对个人和社会造成的代价。