INSERM, U776, Biological Rhythms and Cancers, Villejuif, France.
Chronobiol Int. 2011 Aug;28(7):586-600. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2011.597532.
Circadian clocks control cellular proliferation and drug metabolism over the 24 h. However, circadian chronomodulated chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (chronoFLO4) offered no survival benefit as compared with the non-time-stipulated FOLFOX2, in an international randomized trial involving patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (EORTC 05963). The authors hypothesized that treatment near maximum tolerated dose could disrupt circadian clocks thus impairing the efficacy of chronoFLO4 but not of FOLFOX2. Patients with available data (N = 556) were categorized into three subgroups according to the worst grade (G) of neutropenia experienced during treatment. Distinct multivariate models with time-dependent covariates were constructed for each treatment schedule. Neutropenia incidence (all grades) was 33% on chronoFLO4 and 61% on FOLFOX2 (p < .0001), and G3-4 were 7% and 25%, respectively (p < .0001). Neutropenia was significantly more frequent in women than men on either schedule (FOLFOX2, p = .003; chronoFLO4, p = .04). Median survival was 20.7 mo in patients with G3-4 neutropenia versus 12.5 mo in neutropenia-free patients on FOLFOX2 (p < .0001). Corresponding figures were 13.7 and 19.4 mo, respectively, on chronoFLO4 (p = .36). Multivariate analysis confirmed occurrence of severe neutropenia independently predicted for better overall survival on FOLFOX2 (HR = 0.56; p = .015), and worse survival on chronoFLO4 (HR = 1.77, p = .06), with a significant interaction test (p < .0001). Prediction of better survival in neutropenic patients on FOLFOX2 supports the administration of conventional chemotherapy near maximum tolerated dose. The opposite trend shown here for chronoFLO4 supports the novel concept of jointly optimized hematologic tolerability and efficacy through personalized circadian-timed therapy.
昼夜节律钟控制着细胞在 24 小时内的增殖和药物代谢。然而,在一项涉及未经治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者的国际随机试验中,与非时间规定的 FOLFOX2 相比,5-氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和奥沙利铂的昼夜节律化疗(chronoFLO4)并未提供生存获益。作者假设,接近最大耐受剂量的治疗可能会破坏昼夜节律钟,从而削弱 chronoFLO4 的疗效,但不会削弱 FOLFOX2 的疗效。有可用数据的患者(N=556)根据治疗期间经历的最严重中性粒细胞减少症等级(G)分为三组。为每种治疗方案构建了具有时间依赖性协变量的独特多变量模型。chronoFLO4 的中性粒细胞减少症(所有等级)发生率为 33%,FOLFOX2 为 61%(p<.0001),G3-4 分别为 7%和 25%(p<.0001)。在任一方案中,女性中性粒细胞减少症的发生率均显著高于男性(FOLFOX2,p=0.003;chronoFLO4,p=0.04)。FOLFOX2 中性粒细胞减少症患者的中位生存期为 20.7 个月,无中性粒细胞减少症患者为 12.5 个月(p<.0001)。相应的数字分别为 chronoFLO4 中的 13.7 和 19.4 个月(p=0.36)。多变量分析证实,严重中性粒细胞减少症的发生独立预测了 FOLFOX2 的总体生存更好(HR=0.56;p=0.015),而 chronoFLO4 的生存更差(HR=1.77,p=0.06),具有显著的交互检验(p<.0001)。FOLFOX2 中性粒细胞减少症患者生存更好的预测支持接近最大耐受剂量的常规化疗的给药。而 chronoFLO4 显示出相反的趋势,这支持了通过个性化的昼夜定时治疗联合优化血液学耐受性和疗效的新观念。