Suppr超能文献

国家 EQ-5D 关税和质量调整生命年估计:英国、美国和丹麦效用在瑞典南部类风湿关节炎患者中的比较。

National EQ-5D tariffs and quality-adjusted life-year estimation: comparison of UK, US and Danish utilities in south Swedish rheumatoid arthritis patients.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Section of Rheumatology, Lund University, Sweden.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Dec;70(12):2163-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.153437. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study how the choice of national EQ-5D tariff may affect utility and incremental quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) estimates.

METHODS

South Swedish rheumatoid arthritis patients in an observational study, starting and continuing anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) monotherapy (n=54) or anti-TNF plus methotrexate (n=215) for 1 year during May 2002 to April 2009, were included. EQ-5D questionnaires were completed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Utilities and accumulated QALY were compared using the UK, US and Danish EQ-5D tariffs. Utilities for all 243 possible EQ-5D health states were also compared.

RESULTS

US utilities were generally higher than UK, with Danish falling in between. A substantial 1-year mean utility improvement was seen in both study groups using all tariffs (UK 0.28 vs 0.29; US 0.18 vs 0.19; Danish 0.20 vs 0.22). Adjusting for baseline differences between groups, the incremental QALY gain of combined treatment was 0.09 using the UK tariff, while 0.06 according to both US and Danish tariffs. Inter-tariff disagreement in utility and accumulated QALY varied irregularly across the range of utilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying different national EQ-5D tariffs to the same data may result in substantially different incremental QALY estimates, crucial knowledge when interpreting cost-utility analyses. Studies using different tariffs cannot be directly compared.

摘要

目的

研究国家 EQ-5D 关税的选择如何影响效用和增量质量调整生命年(QALY)的估计。

方法

纳入 2002 年 5 月至 2009 年 4 月期间进行观察性研究的瑞典南部类风湿关节炎患者,他们开始并继续接受抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)单药治疗(n=54)或抗 TNF 加甲氨蝶呤治疗(n=215)1 年。在基线、3、6 和 12 个月时完成 EQ-5D 问卷。使用英国、美国和丹麦 EQ-5D 关税比较效用和累积 QALY。还比较了所有 243 个可能的 EQ-5D 健康状况的效用。

结果

美国的效用普遍高于英国,而丹麦则介于两者之间。所有关税组在 1 年内均观察到了显著的平均效用改善(英国 0.28 对 0.29;美国 0.18 对 0.19;丹麦 0.20 对 0.22)。在调整组间基线差异后,英国关税下联合治疗的增量 QALY 增益为 0.09,而美国和丹麦关税分别为 0.06。关税之间的效用和累积 QALY 差异在效用范围内不规则变化。

结论

将相同的数据应用于不同的国家 EQ-5D 关税可能会导致增量 QALY 的估计有很大差异,这是解释成本效用分析时的关键知识。使用不同关税的研究不能直接比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验