• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是否需要进行生物制剂的头对头试验?价值信息方法在关节炎研究中的作用。

Are head-to-head trials of biologics needed? The role of value of information methods in arthritis research.

机构信息

School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Sep;50 Suppl 4:iv19-25. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker242.

DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/ker242
PMID:21859701
Abstract

Reimbursement decisions are typically based on cost-effectiveness analyses. While a cost-effectiveness analysis can identify the optimum strategy, there is usually some degree of uncertainty around this decision. Sources of uncertainty include statistical sampling error in treatment efficacy measures, underlying baseline risk, utility measures and costs, as well as uncertainty in the structure of the model. The optimal strategy is therefore only optimal on average, and a decision to adopt this strategy might still be the wrong decision if all uncertainty could be eliminated. This means that there is a quantifiable expected (average) loss attaching to decisions made under uncertainty, and hence a value in collecting information to reduce that uncertainty. Value of information (VOI) analyses can be used to provide guidance on whether more research would be cost-effective, which particular model inputs (parameters) have the most bearing on decision uncertainty, and can also help with the design and sample size of further research. Here, we introduce the key concepts in VOI analyses, and highlight the inputs required to calculate it. The adoption of the new biologic treatments for RA and PsA tends to be based on placebo-controlled trials. We discuss the possible role of VOI analyses in deciding whether head-to-head comparisons of the biologic therapies should be carried out, illustrating with examples from other fields. We emphasize the need for a model of the natural history of RA and PsA, which reflects a consensus view.

摘要

报销决策通常基于成本效益分析。虽然成本效益分析可以确定最佳策略,但该决策通常存在一定程度的不确定性。不确定性的来源包括治疗效果测量中的统计抽样误差、潜在的基线风险、效用测量和成本,以及模型结构的不确定性。因此,最佳策略只是平均最优,如果能够消除所有不确定性,那么采用该策略可能仍然是错误的决策。这意味着在不确定情况下做出的决策会带来可量化的预期(平均)损失,因此收集信息以降低不确定性是有价值的。信息价值(VOI)分析可用于提供指导,以确定更多的研究是否具有成本效益,哪些特定的模型输入(参数)对决策不确定性影响最大,并有助于进一步研究的设计和样本量。在这里,我们介绍 VOI 分析的关键概念,并强调计算它所需的输入。新的生物疗法在 RA 和 PsA 中的应用往往基于安慰剂对照试验。我们讨论了在决定是否应该进行生物疗法的头对头比较时使用 VOI 分析的可能作用,并用其他领域的例子来说明。我们强调需要建立一个反映共识观点的 RA 和 PsA 自然史模型。

相似文献

1
Are head-to-head trials of biologics needed? The role of value of information methods in arthritis research.是否需要进行生物制剂的头对头试验?价值信息方法在关节炎研究中的作用。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Sep;50 Suppl 4:iv19-25. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker242.
2
Indirect and mixed treatment comparisons in arthritis research.关节炎研究中的间接和混合治疗比较。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Sep;50 Suppl 4:iv5-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker241.
3
Summary of AHRQ's comparative effectiveness review of drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in adults--an update.美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)对成人类风湿关节炎(RA)药物治疗的比较效果评估综述——最新情况
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 May;18(4 Supp C):S1-18. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.s4-c.1.
4
Golimumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a NICE single technology appraisal.古塞奇尤单抗治疗银屑病关节炎:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所单技术评估报告
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Apr;30(4):257-70. doi: 10.2165/11595920-000000000-00000.
5
Sequential biologic therapy in the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.中国序贯生物疗法治疗活动性银屑病关节炎的成本效益分析
Clin Rheumatol. 2025 Apr;44(4):1597-1606. doi: 10.1007/s10067-025-07368-1. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
6
Treatment persistence among patients with rheumatoid disease (RA, AS, PsA) treated with subcutaneous biologics in Germany.德国接受皮下生物制剂治疗的类风湿病(类风湿关节炎、强直性脊柱炎、银屑病关节炎)患者的治疗持续性。
Rheumatol Int. 2016 Jan;36(1):143-53. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3348-4. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
7
Tailored first-line biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis.类风湿关节炎、脊柱关节炎和银屑病关节炎患者的个体化一线生物治疗
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Apr;45(5):519-32. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
8
Biologics or tofacitinib for people with rheumatoid arthritis naive to methotrexate: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.生物制剂或托法替布用于初治类风湿关节炎患者:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 8;5(5):CD012657. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012657.
9
Second-line biologic therapy optimization in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis.类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎和强直性脊柱炎二线生物制剂治疗的优化。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Oct;47(2):183-192. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
10
Biologics or tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis in incomplete responders to methotrexate or other traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.生物制剂或托法替布用于对甲氨蝶呤或其他传统改善病情抗风湿药物反应不完全的类风湿关节炎患者:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 13;2016(5):CD012183. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012183.

引用本文的文献

1
Value of Information for Clinical Trial Design: The Importance of Considering All Relevant Comparators.临床试验设计的信息价值:考虑所有相关对照的重要性。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 May;42(5):479-486. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01372-0. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
2
Using Adaptive Designs to Avoid Selecting the Wrong Arms in Multiarm Comparative Effectiveness Trials.在多臂比较效果试验中使用适应性设计以避免选错组。
Stat Biopharm Res. 2019;11(4):375-386. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2019.1610044. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
3
Consensus Decision Models for Biologics in Rheumatoid and Psoriatic Arthritis: Recommendations of a Multidisciplinary Working Party.
类风湿性关节炎和银屑病关节炎生物制剂的共识决策模型:多学科工作组的建议
Rheumatol Ther. 2015 Dec;2(2):113-125. doi: 10.1007/s40744-015-0020-0. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
4
Sample Size Estimation for Non-Inferiority Trials: Frequentist Approach versus Decision Theory Approach.非劣效性试验的样本量估计:频率学派方法与决策理论方法
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 15;10(6):e0130531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130531. eCollection 2015.
5
A systematic and critical review of the evolving methods and applications of value of information in academia and practice.系统而批判性地回顾了价值信息在学术界和实践中的不断发展的方法和应用。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Jan;31(1):25-48. doi: 10.1007/s40273-012-0008-3.
6
Variation in dermatologist beliefs about the safety and effectiveness of treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis.皮肤科医生对中重度银屑病治疗安全性和有效性的信念差异。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Feb;68(2):262-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Aug 19.