• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在患者中比较 Glidescope®与 McGrath®视频喉镜

A comparison of the Glidescope® to the McGrath® videolaryngoscope in patients.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiolgy and Pain Medicine, Guri Hospital, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Guri, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011 Jul;61(1):19-23. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.1.19. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

DOI:10.4097/kjae.2011.61.1.19
PMID:21860746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3155131/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Glidescope® videolaryngoscope is a new device for tracheal intubation that provides an improved view of the larynx. This study was performed to compare the Glidescope with the McGrath videolaryngoscope in terms of time to intubation (TTI) and number of attempts.

METHODS

Patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups, Glidescope or McGrath group, by using computer-generated numbers. Tracheal intubation was attempted by an anesthesiologist with extensive experience using these two devices. The operator recorded ease of visualization of glottic structures based on the classification described by Cormack and Lehane. Number of failures, number of attempts and their duration, total intubation time, and events during the whole procedure were recorded. The duration of one attempt was defined as the time elapsed between picking up the endotracheal tube and verification of tracheal intubation with visualization of three expiratory carbon dioxide waveforms. TTI was defined as the sum of the duration of all intubation attempts (as many as three), excluding preoxygenation procedures.

RESULTS

TTI was significantly shorter for the Glidescope® compared to the McGrath® laryngoscope (40.5 vs. 53.3 s, respectively, P < 0.05). However, glottic views obtained at intubation were similar between the two groups. Number of intubation attempts was not significantly different between the two groups (1.03 ± 0.19 vs 1.10 ± 0.32, respectively) (mean ± SD).

CONCLUSIONS

Study results demonstrated that the Glidescope reduced total intubation time in comparison with the McGrath, in terms of TTI in patients with normal airways.

摘要

背景

Glidescope®视频喉镜是一种新的气管插管设备,可提供更好的喉部视图。本研究旨在比较 Glidescope 和 McGrath 视频喉镜在插管时间(TTI)和尝试次数方面的差异。

方法

患者通过计算机生成的数字随机分配到 Glidescope 或 McGrath 组。由一位使用这两种设备经验丰富的麻醉师尝试进行气管插管。操作者根据 Cormack 和 Lehane 描述的分类记录声门结构的可视化难易程度。记录插管失败次数、尝试次数及其持续时间、总插管时间以及整个过程中的事件。一次尝试的持续时间定义为拿起气管内导管与验证气管插管之间的时间间隔,即观察到三个呼气二氧化碳波形。TTI 定义为所有插管尝试(最多三次)的持续时间之和,不包括预吸氧程序。

结果

与 McGrath®喉镜相比,Glidescope®的 TTI 明显缩短(分别为 40.5 和 53.3s,P<0.05)。然而,两组的声门视图相似。两组的插管尝试次数无显著差异(分别为 1.03±0.19 和 1.10±0.32)(均数±标准差)。

结论

在气道正常的患者中,与 McGrath 相比,Glidescope 可减少总插管时间,从而缩短 TTI。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f951/3155131/23470c3be0d5/kjae-61-19-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f951/3155131/eae20d623625/kjae-61-19-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f951/3155131/315e64e23e86/kjae-61-19-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f951/3155131/23470c3be0d5/kjae-61-19-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f951/3155131/eae20d623625/kjae-61-19-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f951/3155131/315e64e23e86/kjae-61-19-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f951/3155131/23470c3be0d5/kjae-61-19-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparison of the Glidescope® to the McGrath® videolaryngoscope in patients.在患者中比较 Glidescope®与 McGrath®视频喉镜
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011 Jul;61(1):19-23. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.1.19. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
2
Orotracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients, comparison of GlideScope(®) video laryngoscope and the LMA CTrach™ with direct laryngoscopy.病态肥胖患者的经口气管插管:GlideScope(®)视频喉镜和LMA CTrach™与直接喉镜检查的比较
Anesth Essays Res. 2012 Jul-Dec;6(2):174-9. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.108304.
3
A comparison of the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tracheal tube placement in patients with a good glottic view at direct laryngoscopy.在直接喉镜检查时具有良好声门视野的患者中,比较 McGrath® Series 5 视频喉镜和 Macintosh 喉镜进行双腔气管导管放置的效果。
Anaesthesia. 2015 Jul;70(7):810-7. doi: 10.1111/anae.13040. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
4
GlideScope® versus C-MAC®(D) videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for double lumen endotracheal intubation in patients with predicted normal airways: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial.GlideScope® 可视喉镜与 C-MAC®(D) 可视喉镜和 Macintosh 喉镜用于预测气道正常的患者双腔气管插管的随机、对照、前瞻性试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 May 20;20(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01012-y.
5
Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: a randomized controlled trial.三种视频喉镜与直接喉镜用于肥胖患者插管的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Jun;31:71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.12.042. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
6
The GlideScope-specific rigid stylet and standard malleable stylet are equally effective for GlideScope use.用于GlideScope喉镜的特定刚性管芯和标准可塑管芯在使用GlideScope喉镜时同样有效。
Can J Anaesth. 2007 Nov;54(11):891-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03026792.
7
Comparison of a single-use GlideScope Cobalt videolaryngoscope with a conventional GlideScope for orotracheal intubation.一次性使用 GlideScope Cobalt 视频喉镜与常规 GlideScope 用于经口气管插管的比较。
Can J Anaesth. 2010 Jan;57(1):18-23. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9204-9. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
8
A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.用于视频喉镜检查的麦金托什喉镜叶片减少了气道正常患者的管芯使用。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Sep;109(3):825-31. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ae39db.
9
McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs Airtraq DL videolaryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation: A randomized trial.用于双腔气管导管插管的麦格拉斯5型视频喉镜与艾特瑞可视喉镜对比:一项随机试验
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(51):e5739. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005739.
10
Comparison of the Pentax AirwayScope and McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in patients with a normal airway.宾得气道镜与麦格拉斯MAC视频喉镜用于正常气道患者气管插管的比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(46):e8713. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008713.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparisons of Videolaryngoscopes for Intubation Undergoing General Anesthesia: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.全身麻醉下视频喉镜插管的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 26;12(3):363. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030363.
2
Video Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Inpatient Emergency Intubation in Adults.成人住院患者紧急经口气管插管时视频喉镜与直接喉镜的比较。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Jun 29;115(26):437-444. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0437.
3
A comparative study of McGrath and Airtraq videolaryngoscopes for tracheal intubation.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope after failed direct laryngoscopy.评估在直接喉镜检查失败后的 McGrath Series 5 视频喉镜。
Anaesthesia. 2010 Jul;65(7):716-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06388.x. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
2
A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients.三种视频喉镜的比较:麦金托什喉镜叶片可减少但不能替代在病态肥胖患者插管时常规使用探条。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1560-5. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b7303a. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
3
A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
麦格拉斯喉镜与艾克瑞可视喉镜用于气管插管的比较研究。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr-Jun;33(2):221-225. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_370_15.
4
Comparison of the GlideScope and the McGrath method using vascular forceps and a tube exchanger in cases of simulated difficult airway intubation.在模拟困难气道插管病例中,使用血管钳和换管器对GlideScope喉镜和麦格拉思喉镜方法的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016 Apr;69(2):133-7. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.2.133. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
5
Nasotracheal intubation with MacGrath videolaryngoscope using Schroeder directional stylet: Case series.使用施罗德定向探条经麦格拉斯视频喉镜行鼻气管插管:病例系列
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Apr-Jun;31(2):239-41. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.155156.
6
[Indirect laryngoscopy/video laryngoscopy. A review of devices used in emergency and intensive care medicine in Germany].
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2012 Oct;107(7):521-30. doi: 10.1007/s00063-012-0090-5. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
用于视频喉镜检查的麦金托什喉镜叶片减少了气道正常患者的管芯使用。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Sep;109(3):825-31. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ae39db.
4
Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists.经验不足的麻醉医生使用麦格拉斯5系列视频喉镜进行插管的随机对照试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Sep;103(3):440-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep191. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
5
Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope, and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization.颈椎固定患者使用Macintosh、Truview EVO2、Glidescope和Airwayscope喉镜的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Nov;101(5):723-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen231. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
6
Use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope in the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation.
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jan;100(1):116-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem303. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
7
Difficult airway management following supratentorial craniotomy: a useful maneuver with a new device.幕上开颅术后困难气道管理:一种使用新设备的有用操作。
Anesth Analg. 2007 Aug;105(2):552-3. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000268139.62137.f6.
8
Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope.使用GlideScope视频喉镜和Macintosh直接喉镜进行经口气管插管时血流动力学反应的比较。
J Clin Anesth. 2007 Jun;19(4):245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.11.004.
9
Case series: the McGrath videolaryngoscope--an initial clinical evaluation.病例系列:麦格拉斯视频喉镜——初步临床评估
Can J Anaesth. 2007 Apr;54(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/BF03022777.
10
Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients.新型视频喉镜(GlideScope)在728例患者中的早期临床经验。
Can J Anaesth. 2005 Feb;52(2):191-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03027728.