Claydon Amy J, Beynon Robert J
Protein Function Group, Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Methods Mol Biol. 2011;759:179-95. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-173-4_11.
Early achievements in proteomics were qualitative, typified by the identification of very small quantities of proteins. However, as the subject has developed, there has been a pressure to develop approaches to define the amounts of each protein--whether in a relative or an absolute sense. A further dimension to quantitative proteomics embeds the behavior of each protein in terms of its turnover. Virtually every protein in the cell is in a dynamic state, subject to continuous synthesis and degradation, the relative rates of which control the expansion or the contraction of the protein pool, and the absolute values of which dictate the temporal responsiveness of the protein pool. Strategies must therefore be developed to assess the turnover of individual proteins in the proteome. Because a protein can be turning over rapidly even when the protein pool is in steady state, the only acceptable approach to measure turnover is to use metabolic labels that are incorporated or lost from the protein pool as it is replaced. Using metabolic labeling on a proteome-wide scale in turn requires metabolic labels that contain stable isotopes, the incorporation or loss of which can be assessed by mass spectrometry. A typical turnover experiment is complex. The choice of metabolic label is dictated by several factors, including abundance in the proteome, metabolic redistribution of the label in the precursor pool, and the downstream mass spectrometric analytical protocols. Key issues include the need to control and understand the relative isotope abundance of the precursor, the optimization of label flux into and out of the protein pool, and a sampling strategy that ensures the coverage of the greatest range of turnover rates. Finally, the informatics approaches to data analysis will not be as straightforward as in other areas of proteomics. In this chapter, we will discuss the principles and practice of workflow development for turnover analysis, exemplified by the development of methodologies for turnover analysis in the model eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
蛋白质组学的早期成果是定性的,以鉴定极少量蛋白质为典型特征。然而,随着该领域的发展,出现了一种压力,即要开发出确定每种蛋白质含量的方法——无论是相对含量还是绝对含量。定量蛋白质组学的另一个维度是根据每种蛋白质的周转情况来描述其行为。细胞内几乎每种蛋白质都处于动态状态,不断进行合成和降解,其相对速率控制着蛋白质库的扩大或收缩,而其绝对值则决定了蛋白质库的时间响应性。因此,必须制定策略来评估蛋白质组中单个蛋白质的周转情况。即使蛋白质库处于稳态,一种蛋白质也可能快速周转,因此测量周转的唯一可接受方法是使用代谢标记物,当蛋白质库被替换时,这些标记物会被整合到蛋白质库中或从蛋白质库中丢失。在全蛋白质组范围内使用代谢标记反过来需要含有稳定同位素的代谢标记物,其整合或丢失可以通过质谱法进行评估。一个典型的周转实验很复杂。代谢标记物的选择取决于几个因素,包括在蛋白质组中的丰度、标记物在前体库中的代谢再分布以及下游质谱分析方案。关键问题包括需要控制和理解前体的相对同位素丰度、优化标记物流入和流出蛋白质库的通量,以及确保覆盖最大周转速率范围的采样策略。最后,数据分析的信息学方法不会像蛋白质组学的其他领域那样直接。在本章中,我们将讨论周转分析工作流程开发的原理和实践,以模式真核生物酿酒酵母中周转分析方法的开发为例。