Bandi G, Larizza U, Rodolico R, Giuberchio C, Bagliani F
Servizio di Radiologia, Ospedale Civile degli Infermi, USSL 78, Vigevano, Pavia.
Radiol Med. 1990 Mar;79(3):228-32.
The authors report their experience in the study of urinary stress incontinence, by evaluating both affinities and differences between conventional techniques (cystography) and transrectal US. The parameters are evaluated concerning the relationship of the vesical cervix to the inferior margin of the pubis, together with the posterior urethrovesical angle (PUV), and the urethral inclination axis (AV). Twenty-five women with urinary stress incontinence were studied, and 20 subjects with different pathologic conditions. No single parameter considered appeared to be conclusive: as a matter of fact, both methods offer advantages and disadvantages, which are described.
作者报告了他们在尿失禁研究中的经验，通过评估传统技术（膀胱造影）和经直肠超声之间的相似性和差异。评估了膀胱宫颈与耻骨下缘的关系、后尿道膀胱角（PUV）以及尿道倾斜轴（AV）等参数。对25名压力性尿失禁女性和20名患有不同病理状况的受试者进行了研究。所考虑的单一参数似乎都不具有决定性：事实上，两种方法都有优缺点，文中对此进行了描述。
