Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Brønderslev Psychiatric Hospital, Hjørringvej 180, Brønderslev, Denmark.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;45(8):654-62. doi: 10.3109/00048674.2011.589368.
The aim of this study was to establish the predictive value of an ICD-10 diagnosis of depressive disorder or dysthymia (depressive patients) among 70 years + frail rural community living patients by measuring morbidity, mortality and use of health services. Identical measures were studied over time in general elderly populations.
morbidity, mortality and use of health services were registered over 13 years in: (i) a clinical cohort of frail community-living depressive patients (n = 38), a frail control group (n = 116) and non-frail elderly people (n = 575), all living in the same municipality, and (ii) register-based samples of general rural (n = 4 115) and capital living (n = 54 977) elderly populations. The outcome measures were compared using data from Danish national health registers.
Every one of the clinical cohort of depressive patients had died at the end of the study. Compared with both the frail control group and the non-frail elderly people, the depressive patients had significantly more psychiatric hospital days, outpatient home visits, antidepressant use, antipsychotic use, GP service use and more psychiatric diagnoses with higher morbidity. However, greater use of somatic hospital services or more somatic diagnoses among the depressive elderly patients were not observed. The general elderly population living in the capital had, compared with rural equals, significantly more somatic and psychiatric diagnoses, larger use of somatic hospital services, psychiatric hospital days, antipsychotics and anxiolytics, but less use of antidepressants, psychiatric outpatient home visits and GP services.
An ICD-10 diagnosis of depressive disorder or dysthymia predicted increased use of psychiatric services, more psychiatric diagnoses and increased mortality, indicating poor late-life psychiatric outcome. Contrasting with other studies, depression did not predict increased use of somatic hospital services or more somatic diagnoses. The differences in health care status and use between elderly living in the capital and in rural areas elderly are novel findings.
本研究旨在通过测量发病率、死亡率和卫生服务利用情况,确定 ICD-10 诊断为抑郁障碍或心境恶劣(抑郁患者)在 70 岁以上农村社区体弱患者中的预测价值。在一般老年人群中,也研究了相同的指标随时间的变化。
在 13 年期间,在以下人群中登记了发病率、死亡率和卫生服务利用情况:(i)居住在同一城市的虚弱社区居住的抑郁患者(n=38)、虚弱对照组(n=116)和非虚弱老年人(n=575)的临床队列中;(ii)基于登记的农村(n=4115)和首都居住(n=54977)老年人的样本中。使用丹麦国家卫生登记处的数据比较了这些结果测量。
临床队列中的每一位抑郁患者在研究结束时都已死亡。与虚弱对照组和非虚弱老年人相比,抑郁患者的精神科住院天数、门诊家访、抗抑郁药使用、抗精神病药使用、全科医生服务使用以及更多的精神科诊断和更高的发病率明显更高。然而,在老年抑郁患者中,并没有观察到更多的躯体医院服务或更多的躯体诊断。与农村同龄人相比,居住在首都的一般老年人群有更多的躯体和精神科诊断、更多的躯体医院服务使用、精神科住院天数、抗精神病药和安定药使用,但抗抑郁药、精神科门诊家访和全科医生服务的使用较少。
ICD-10 诊断为抑郁障碍或心境恶劣预测增加精神科服务的使用、更多的精神科诊断和增加的死亡率,表明晚年精神科预后不良。与其他研究不同,抑郁并没有预测更多的躯体医院服务或更多的躯体诊断。首都和农村地区老年人之间在医疗保健状况和利用方面的差异是新的发现。