Suppr超能文献

缓激肽不能介导人体内的远程缺血预处理或缺血再灌注损伤。

Bradykinin does not mediate remote ischaemic preconditioning or ischaemia-reperfusion injury in vivo in man.

机构信息

Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Heart. 2011 Nov;97(22):1857-61. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300323. Epub 2011 Aug 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether endogenous bradykinin mediates the endothelium-dependent vasomotor dysfunction induced by ischaemia-reperfusion injury, or the protection afforded by remote ischaemic preconditioning in vivo in man.

DESIGN

Randomised double-blind, cross-over study.

SETTINGS

Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility.

PATIENTS

Twenty healthy male volunteers.

INTERVENTIONS

Subjects were randomised to intravenous infusion of the bradykinin B(2) receptor antagonist, HOE-140 (100 μg/kg), or saline placebo in a double-blind, crossover trial. Ischaemia-reperfusion injury was induced in the non-dominant arm by inflating a cuff to 200 mm Hg for 20 min in all subjects. Ischaemia-reperfusion injury was preceded by three cycles of remote ischaemic preconditioning in the dominant arm in 10 subjects.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Bilateral forearm blood flow was assessed using venous occlusion plethysmography during intra-arterial infusion of acetylcholine (5-20 μg/min).

RESULTS

Acetylcholine caused vasodilatation in all studies (p<0.05) that was attenuated by ischaemia-reperfusion injury, both in the presence (p=0.0002) and absence (p=0.04) of HOE-140. Remote ischaemic preconditioning abolished the impairment of endothelium-dependent vasomotor function induced by ischaemia-reperfusion injury. HOE-140 had no effect on the protection afforded by remote ischaemic preconditioning.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings do not support a major role for endogenous bradykinin, acting via the B(2) kinin receptor, in the mechanism of ischaemia-reperfusion injury or the protective effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning in man.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

NCT00965120 and NCT00965393.

摘要

目的

研究内源性缓激肽是否介导了缺血再灌注损伤引起的血管内皮依赖性血管舒缩功能障碍,以及在人体内,远程缺血预处理的保护作用是否由其介导。

设计

随机、双盲、交叉研究。

地点

爱丁堡皇家医院,威康信托临床研究设施。

患者

20 名健康男性志愿者。

干预

受试者随机接受静脉内注射缓激肽 B(2)受体拮抗剂 HOE-140(100μg/kg)或生理盐水安慰剂,进行双盲、交叉试验。所有受试者的非优势手臂通过充气袖带至 200mmHg 充气 20 分钟,诱导缺血再灌注损伤。在 10 名受试者的优势手臂中,在缺血再灌注损伤前进行了三个周期的远程缺血预处理。

主要观察指标

在动脉内输注乙酰胆碱(5-20μg/min)期间,使用静脉闭塞容积描记法评估双侧前臂血流。

结果

在所有研究中,乙酰胆碱均引起血管舒张(p<0.05),但在缺血再灌注损伤时(p=0.0002)和不存在时(p=0.04)均被抑制。远程缺血预处理消除了缺血再灌注损伤引起的内皮依赖性血管舒缩功能障碍。HOE-140 对远程缺血预处理提供的保护没有影响。

结论

这些发现不支持内源性缓激肽通过 B(2)激肽受体在缺血再灌注损伤机制或远程缺血预处理的保护作用中起主要作用。

临床试验注册号

NCT00965120 和 NCT00965393。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验