Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Oct;77(20):7227-35. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00679-11. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
Bacteria rely on a range of extracellular metabolites to suppress competitors, gain access to resources, and exploit plant or animal hosts. The GacS/GacA two-component regulatory system positively controls the expression of many of these beneficial external products in pseudomonad bacteria. Natural populations often contain variants with defective Gac systems that do not produce most external products. These mutants benefit from a decreased metabolic load but do not appear to displace the wild type in nature. How could natural selection maintain the wild type in the presence of a mutant with enhanced growth? One hypothesis is that Gac mutants are "cheaters" that do not contribute to the public good, favored within groups but selected against between groups, as groups containing more mutants lose access to ecologically important external products. An alternative hypothesis is that Gac mutants have a mutualistic interaction with the wild type, so that each variant benefits by the presence of the other. In the biocontrol bacterium Pseudomonas chlororaphis strain 30-84, Gac mutants do not produce phenazines, which suppress competitor growth and are critical for biofilm formation. Here, we test the predictions of these alternative hypotheses by quantifying interactions between the wild type and the phenazine- and biofilm-deficient Gac mutant within growing biofilms. We find evidence that the wild type and Gac mutants interact mutualistically in the biofilm context, whereas a phenazine-defective structural mutant does not. Our results suggest that the persistence of alternative Gac phenotypes may be due to the stabilizing role of local mutualistic interactions.
细菌依赖一系列细胞外代谢物来抑制竞争者、获取资源并利用植物或动物宿主。GacS/GacA 双组分调节系统正向调控假单胞菌中许多有益外部产物的表达。自然种群中经常包含缺陷 Gac 系统的变体,这些变体不产生大多数外部产物。这些突变体受益于降低的代谢负担,但在自然界中似乎不会取代野生型。在存在具有增强生长能力的突变体的情况下,自然选择如何维持野生型?一种假设是 Gac 突变体是“骗子”,它们不贡献公共利益,在群体内受到青睐,但在群体间被选择淘汰,因为含有更多突变体的群体无法获得对生态重要的外部产物。另一种假设是 Gac 突变体与野生型之间存在互利共生关系,因此每个变体都受益于另一个变体的存在。在生物防治细菌假单胞菌属菌株 30-84 中,Gac 突变体不产生苯并嗪,苯并嗪抑制竞争者生长,对生物膜形成至关重要。在这里,我们通过量化生长中的生物膜内野生型和缺乏苯并嗪和生物膜的 Gac 突变体之间的相互作用来检验这些替代假设的预测。我们发现证据表明,野生型和 Gac 突变体在生物膜环境中相互互利,而缺乏苯并嗪的结构突变体则没有。我们的结果表明,替代 Gac 表型的持久性可能是由于局部互利相互作用的稳定作用。