Suppr超能文献

匹伐他汀与辛伐他汀的长期疗效比较。

Long-term efficacy of pitavastatin versus simvastatin.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism & Diabetes, Karolinska University Hospital, M63 SE14186, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2011 Sep;28(9):799-810. doi: 10.1007/s12325-011-0057-6. Epub 2011 Aug 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pitavastatin is a novel, potent, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. This study compared the long-term efficacy of pitavastatin and simvastatin in dyslipidemic patients at high risk of coronary heart disease.

METHODS

A 44-week blinded extension study was conducted at 24 centers in five European countries for patients who had previously completed a 12-week randomized, double-blind core study in which they received pitavastatin 4 mg or simvastatin 40 mg once daily. Patients originally randomized to pitavastatin 4 mg continued at the same dose throughout the extension study (n = 121). In simvastatin-treated patients (n = 57), the dose was increased to 80 mg in five patients who had not attained the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) target for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) during the core study. Primary endpoints were the proportion of patients attaining the NCEP and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) LDL-C targets, and the NCEP target for non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) at weeks 16 and 44.

RESULTS

Of the 178 patients who entered the extension study, 156 patients (109 in the pitavastatin group, 47 in the simvastatin groups) completed the 44-week treatment period. At week 44, NCEP and EAS targets were attained by 81.7% and 84.2%, respectively, of pitavastatin-treated patients, and 75.4% and 73.7%, respectively, of simvastatin-treated patients. NCEP targets for non-HDL-C were achieved by 79.2% of pitavastatin-treated patients and 70.2% of simvastatin-treated patients. Both treatments were generally well tolerated, but pitavastatin 4 mg was associated with a numerically lower incidence of discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events (5.8% vs. 10.5% of patients) and a lower rate of myalgia (4.1% vs. 12.3%) compared with simvastatin 40-80 mg.

CONCLUSION

Pitavastatin 4 mg provides long-term efficacy similar to that of simvastatin 40-80 mg. Further studies should ascertain whether trends suggesting that pitavastatin may exhibit a more favorable long-term tolerability profile are statistically significant.

摘要

简介

匹伐他汀是一种新型强效 3-羟基-3-甲基戊二酰辅酶 A 还原酶抑制剂。本研究比较了匹伐他汀和辛伐他汀在冠心病高危血脂异常患者中的长期疗效。

方法

在欧洲五个国家的 24 个中心进行了一项为期 44 周的双盲扩展研究,纳入了先前完成的为期 12 周随机、双盲核心研究的患者。这些患者接受匹伐他汀 4mg 或辛伐他汀 40mg 每日一次治疗。最初随机接受匹伐他汀 4mg 的患者(n=121)在整个扩展研究期间继续使用相同剂量。在接受辛伐他汀治疗的患者(n=57)中,有 5 名患者在核心研究期间未达到国家胆固醇教育计划(NCEP)低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)目标,剂量增加至 80mg。主要终点是在第 16 周和第 44 周达到 NCEP 和欧洲动脉粥样硬化学会(EAS)LDL-C 目标以及 NCEP 非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(非-HDL-C)目标的患者比例。

结果

178 名进入扩展研究的患者中,156 名患者(匹伐他汀组 109 名,辛伐他汀组 47 名)完成了 44 周的治疗期。在第 44 周时,匹伐他汀治疗组分别有 81.7%和 84.2%的患者达到 NCEP 和 EAS 目标,辛伐他汀治疗组分别有 75.4%和 73.7%的患者达到 NCEP 目标。匹伐他汀治疗组有 79.2%的患者和辛伐他汀治疗组有 70.2%的患者达到 NCEP 非-HDL-C 目标。两种治疗方法均普遍耐受良好,但与辛伐他汀 40-80mg 相比,匹伐他汀 4mg 导致因治疗相关不良事件而停药的发生率较低(分别为 5.8%和 10.5%的患者),肌痛发生率较低(分别为 4.1%和 12.3%的患者)。

结论

匹伐他汀 4mg 的长期疗效与辛伐他汀 40-80mg 相似。进一步的研究应该确定匹伐他汀可能表现出更有利的长期耐受性的趋势是否具有统计学意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验