Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Oct;20(10):2127-31. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0437. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
Fatalistic beliefs about cancer have been implicated in low uptake of screening and delay in presentation particularly in low socioeconomic status (SES) groups, but no studies have systematically evaluated interrelationships between SES, fatalism, and early detection behaviors. We explored whether (i) fatalism is associated with negative attitudes toward early detection, (ii) lower SES groups are more fatalistic, and (iii) SES differences in fatalism partly explain SES differences in attitudes toward early detection.
In a population-representative sample of adults in Britain using computer-based interviews in the home setting, respondents (N = 2,018) answered two questions to index fatalism (expectations of cancer survival and cure) and two items on early detection attitudes (the perceived value of early detection and fear of symptom reporting). SES was indexed with a social grade classification.
Fatalism was associated with being less positive about early detection (β = -0.40, P < 0.001) and more fearful about seeking help for a suspicious symptom (β = 0.24, P < 0.001). Lower SES groups were more fatalistic (β = -0.21, P < 0.001). Path analyses suggest that SES differences in fatalism might explain SES differences in attitudes about early detection.
In this population sample, SES differences in fatalism partly explained SES differences in the perceived value of early detection and fear of symptom presentation.
Fatalistic beliefs about cancer should be targeted to promote early presentation of cancer and this may be particularly important for lower SES groups.
关于癌症的宿命信念与筛查参与率低和就诊延迟有关,尤其是在社会经济地位(SES)较低的群体中,但尚无研究系统评估 SES、宿命论和早期检测行为之间的相互关系。我们探讨了以下问题:(i)宿命论是否与对早期检测的消极态度有关;(ii)SES 较低的群体是否更宿命;以及(iii)SES 差异在宿命论方面部分解释了 SES 差异在对早期检测的态度方面的原因。
在英国的一项基于人群的成年人代表性样本中,使用家庭环境中的计算机化访谈,受访者(N=2018)回答了两个问题来评估宿命论(对癌症存活和治愈的期望)以及对早期检测态度的两个项目(对早期检测的价值的感知和对症状报告的恐惧)。SES 采用社会等级分类来衡量。
宿命论与对早期检测的态度不太积极(β=-0.40,P<0.001)和对可疑症状寻求帮助的恐惧程度增加(β=0.24,P<0.001)有关。SES 较低的群体更宿命(β=-0.21,P<0.001)。路径分析表明,宿命论方面的 SES 差异可能部分解释了 SES 差异在对早期检测的态度方面的原因。
在该人群样本中,宿命论方面的 SES 差异部分解释了 SES 差异在对早期检测的价值的感知和对症状表现的恐惧方面的原因。
应该针对癌症的宿命信念进行干预,以促进癌症的早期就诊,这对于 SES 较低的群体可能尤为重要。