• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症宿命论和自我健康评估不佳会调节社会经济地位与英格兰结直肠癌筛查参与度之间的关联。

Cancer fatalism and poor self-rated health mediate the association between socioeconomic status and uptake of colorectal cancer screening in England.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Oct;20(10):2132-40. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0453. Epub 2011 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0453
PMID:21953115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3199581/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the psychological predictors of colorectal screening uptake in England and mediators of associations between uptake and socioeconomic status (SES). This study tested the hypotheses that although higher threat and efficacy beliefs, lower cancer fatalism, lower depression, and better self-rated health would predict higher screening uptake, only efficacy beliefs, fatalism, depression, and self-rated health would mediate associations between uptake and SES.

METHODS

Data from 529 adults aged 60 to 69 who had completed a postal survey in 2005-2006 were linked with data on fecal occult blood test (FOBt) uptake recorded at the screening "hub" following its introduction in 2007, resulting in a prospective study.

RESULTS

Screening uptake was 56% and was higher among people with higher SES, better self-rated health, higher self-efficacy beliefs, and lower cancer fatalism in univariate analyses. Path analysis on participants with complete data (n = 515) showed that both better self-rated health and lower cancer fatalism were directly associated with higher uptake of FOBt screening and significantly mediated pathways from SES to uptake. Lower depression only had an indirect effect on uptake through better self-rated health. Efficacy beliefs did not mediate the relationship between SES and uptake.

CONCLUSION

SES differences in uptake of FOBt in England are partially explained by differences in cancer fatalism, self-rated health, and depression.

IMPACT

This is one of only a few studies to examine mediators of the relationship between SES and screening uptake, and future research could test the effectiveness of interventions to reduce fatalistic beliefs to increase equality of uptake.

摘要

背景

对于英格兰人群接受结直肠癌筛查的心理预测因素以及接受程度与社会经济地位(SES)之间关联的中介因素知之甚少。本研究检验了以下假设:尽管较高的威胁和效能信念、较低的癌症宿命论、较低的抑郁程度和较好的自我健康评估会预测更高的筛查参与度,但只有效能信念、宿命论、抑郁程度和自我健康评估会调节接受程度与 SES 之间的关联。

方法

2005 年至 2006 年,对 529 名年龄在 60 至 69 岁之间的成年人进行了邮寄调查,随后在 2007 年引入粪便潜血试验(FOBt)筛查后,将其与筛查“中心”记录的 FOBt 接受情况的数据进行了关联,从而开展了一项前瞻性研究。

结果

筛查参与率为 56%,在单变量分析中,SES 较高、自我健康评估较好、自我效能信念较高和癌症宿命论较低的人群筛查参与度更高。对具有完整数据的参与者(n = 515)进行路径分析显示,自我健康评估更好和癌症宿命论更低与更高的 FOBt 筛查接受度直接相关,并且显著调节了 SES 与参与度之间的路径。抑郁程度仅通过自我健康评估对参与度有间接影响。效能信念并未调节 SES 与参与度之间的关系。

结论

英格兰人群 FOBt 筛查接受度的 SES 差异部分可由癌症宿命论、自我健康评估和抑郁程度的差异来解释。

影响

这是为数不多的研究 SES 与筛查参与度之间关系的中介因素的研究之一,未来的研究可以检验减少宿命论信念以提高平等参与度的干预措施的有效性。

相似文献

1
Cancer fatalism and poor self-rated health mediate the association between socioeconomic status and uptake of colorectal cancer screening in England.癌症宿命论和自我健康评估不佳会调节社会经济地位与英格兰结直肠癌筛查参与度之间的关联。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Oct;20(10):2132-40. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0453. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
2
Cancer fatalism: deterring early presentation and increasing social inequalities?癌症宿命论:阻碍早期就诊并加剧社会不平等?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Oct;20(10):2127-31. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0437. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
3
Fatalism among elderly African Americans. Effects on colorectal cancer screening.老年非裔美国人中的宿命论。对结直肠癌筛查的影响。
Cancer Nurs. 1995 Oct;18(5):385-92.
4
Access to Health Care, Beliefs, and Behaviors about Colorectal Cancer Screening among Korean Americans.韩裔美国人获得医疗保健的情况、对结直肠癌筛查的看法及行为
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Jul 27;19(7):2021-2027. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.7.2021.
5
South Asian ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and psychological mediators of faecal occult blood colorectal screening participation: A prospective test of a process model.南亚种族、社会经济地位以及粪便潜血结直肠癌筛查参与度的心理中介因素:一个过程模型的前瞻性检验
Health Psychol. 2017 Dec;36(12):1161-1172. doi: 10.1037/hea0000525. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
6
An intervention to decrease cancer fatalism among rural elders.一项降低农村老年人癌症宿命论的干预措施。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999 Apr;26(3):583-8.
7
Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.种族和社会经济地位与美国南部成年人结直肠癌筛查、结直肠癌风险和死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17995.
8
Decomposing socio-economic inequality in colorectal cancer screening uptake in England.剖析英国结直肠癌筛查接受情况中的社会经济不平等现象。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jun;134:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
9
Predictors of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) completion among low-income adults.低收入成年人粪便潜血试验(FOBT)完成情况的预测因素。
Prev Med. 2005 Aug;41(2):676-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.12.010.
10
Geographic disparities in cancer screening and fatalism among a nationally representative sample of US adults.美国成年人全国代表性样本中癌症筛查和宿命论的地理差异。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Dec;73(12):1128-1135. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-212425. Epub 2019 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Relationship Between Self-Rated General Health and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake.评估自我评定的总体健康状况与结直肠癌筛查接受情况之间的关系。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 19;16(11):e74014. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74014. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Analysing Inequalities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Using an Individual Socioeconomic Status Index.使用个体社会经济地位指数分析结直肠癌筛查中的不平等现象。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Nov 25;16(23):3940. doi: 10.3390/cancers16233940.
3
Socio-Economic Inequalities in Beliefs About Cancer and its Causes: Evidence From two Population Surveys.关于癌症及其病因认知的社会经济不平等:来自两项人口调查的证据
Psychooncology. 2024 Dec;33(12):e70035. doi: 10.1002/pon.70035.
4
Examining the Role of Information Behavior in Linking Cancer Risk Perception and Cancer Worry to Cancer Fatalism in China: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.考察信息行为在中国将癌症风险感知与癌症担忧联系起来并导致癌症宿命论中的作用:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 31;26:e49383. doi: 10.2196/49383.
5
Quantitative Evaluation of Cancer Stigma among Non-Patient Population in Oman.阿曼非患者人群癌症污名的定量评估。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Apr 1;25(4):1223-1229. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.4.1223.
6
Community perception of causes of death using verbal autopsy for diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯通过死因推断调查社区对糖尿病死因的认知情况。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Dec 5;3(12):e0001690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001690. eCollection 2023.
7
Understanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography: a mixed methods scoping review of the current literature.理解患者接受低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查的障碍和促进因素:对当前文献的混合方法范围综述。
Respir Res. 2022 Dec 23;23(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02255-8.
8
Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Screening Disparities in U.S. Men and Women Using a Demographically Representative Sample.采用人口代表性样本评估美国男性和女性的结直肠癌筛查差异。
Cancer Res Commun. 2022 Jun;2(6):561-569. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-22-0079. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
9
'Oral Cancer is a Punishment for my Sins': Oral Histories of Oral Cancer, Fatalism and Islamic Religious Beliefs in Pakistan.“口腔癌是我罪孽的惩罚”:巴基斯坦口腔癌、宿命论和伊斯兰教信仰的口述历史。
J Relig Health. 2022 Dec;61(6):4337-4351. doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01585-7. Epub 2022 May 31.
10
The feasibility of implementing risk stratification into a national breast cancer screening programme: a focus group study investigating the perspectives of healthcare personnel responsible for delivery.实施风险分层筛查纳入国家乳腺癌筛查计划的可行性:一项针对负责实施人员的观点的焦点小组研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 May 2;22(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01730-0.

本文引用的文献

1
A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1.恐惧诉求与态度改变的保护动机理论1。
J Psychol. 1975 Sep;91(1):93-114. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803.
2
Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in England.参与有组织的全国结直肠癌筛查计划的不平等:来自英格兰前 260 万份邀请的结果。
Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;40(3):712-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr008. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
3
Socioeconomic status and changing inequalities in colorectal cancer? A review of the associations with risk, treatment and outcome.社会经济地位与结直肠癌的变化不平等?对风险、治疗和结局关联的综述。
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Oct;46(15):2681-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
4
Evaluating the impact of an educational intervention to increase CRC screening rates in the African American community: a preliminary study.评估教育干预对非裔美国人社区增加 CRC 筛查率的影响:一项初步研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Oct;21(10):1685-91. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9597-3. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
5
Utilization of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and fecal occult blood test in 11 European countries: evidence from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).11 个欧洲国家的下消化道内镜检查和粪便潜血试验的利用情况:来自欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)的证据。
Endoscopy. 2010 Jul;42(7):546-56. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244127. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
6
Predictors of breast cancer screening behavior in women with a strong family history of the disease.具有强烈家族病史的女性乳腺癌筛查行为的预测因素。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Nov;124(2):509-19. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0868-1. Epub 2010 Apr 4.
7
Socio-economic differentials in peripheral biology: cumulative allostatic load.社会经济差异与外周生物学:累积性全身适应综合征。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Feb;1186:223-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05341.x.
8
Breast and cervical cancer screening specific effects of depression and obesity.乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查中抑郁和肥胖的特定影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.039.
9
Determinants of participation in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing.参与粪便潜血检测筛查结直肠癌的决定因素。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2010 Sep;32(3):395-405. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp115. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
10
Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in England.英格兰全国筛查计划首轮中结直肠癌筛查参与的不平等现象。
Br J Cancer. 2009 Dec 3;101 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S60-3. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605392.