Grossi Débora Bevilaqua, Chaves Thais Cristina, Gonçalves Maria Claudia, Moreira Viviane Coimbra, Canonica Alexandra Carolina, Florencio Lidiane Lima, Bordini Carlos Alberto, Speciali José Geraldo, Bigal Marcelo Eduardo
Department of Biomechanics Medicine and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor Apparatus, Av. Bandeirantes 3900 - 14049-900 Ribeirão Preto SP - Brazil.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2011 Aug;69(4):607-12. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2011000500007.
To estimate the pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the craniocervical muscles in women with episodic migraine (EM) n=15 and chronic migraine (CM) n=14, and in healthy volunteers (C) n=15.
A blinded examiner obtained the PPT bilaterally, by pressure algometry, for the following muscles: frontalis, temporalis, masseter, trapezius and sternocleidomastoid. ANOVA (p<0.05) was used for statistical purposes.
Contrasted to controls, individuals with EM had significantly decreased PPT values for frontal muscle (EM: 2.01±0.67 vs. C: 2.85±0.71), posterior temporalis bilaterally (right and left, respectively) (EM: 2.72±0.89 vs. C: 3.36±0.72 and EM: 2.60±1.00 vs. C: 3.35±0.85), upper trapezius bilaterally (EM: 2.69±1.00 vs. C: 3.49±0.83 and EM: 2.54±0.93 vs. C: 3.32±0.97) and women with CM: on frontal muscle bilaterally (CM: 2.16±0.52 vs. C: 2.79±0.71 and CM: 2.01±0.67 vs. C: 2.85±0.71) and upper trapezius (CM: 2.66±0.84 vs. C: 3.32±0.97), however, it was not verified differences between PPT values between EM and CM groups.
PPT is decreased in women with migraine relative to controls. Future studies should explore this parameter as a biological marker of the disease and a predictor of treatment.
评估发作性偏头痛(EM,n = 15)、慢性偏头痛(CM,n = 14)女性患者以及健康志愿者(C,n = 15)颅颈肌的压痛阈(PPT)。
由一位不知情的检查者通过压力痛觉测定法双侧获取以下肌肉的PPT:额肌、颞肌、咬肌、斜方肌和胸锁乳突肌。采用方差分析(p < 0.05)进行统计学分析。
与对照组相比,EM患者的额肌PPT值显著降低(EM:2.01±0.67 vs. C:2.85±0.71),双侧颞肌后部(分别为右侧和左侧)(EM:2.72±0.89 vs. C:3.36±0.72以及EM:2.60±1.00 vs. C:3.35±0.85),双侧斜方肌上部(EM:2.69±1.00 vs. C:3.49±0.83以及EM:2.54±0.93 vs. C:3.32±0.97);CM女性患者:双侧额肌(CM:2.16±0.52 vs. C:2.79±0.71以及CM:2.01±0.67 vs. C:2.85±0.71)和斜方肌上部(CM:2.66±0.84 vs. C:3.32±0.97),然而,未证实EM组和CM组之间PPT值存在差异。
偏头痛女性患者的PPT相对于对照组降低。未来研究应探索将该参数作为疾病的生物学标志物和治疗预测指标。