• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

操纵反应选择与外源性眼跳潜伏期之间的关系。

Manipulations of the relationship between response alternatives and exogenous saccade latencies.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2011 Oct;214(2):241-7. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2824-7. Epub 2011 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-011-2824-7
PMID:21877103
Abstract

The relationship between the latencies of saccadic eye movements and the number of response alternatives is complex. Previously, we have found a decrease in exogenous saccade latencies with an increase in the number of response alternatives (i.e., an anti-Hick's effect). In the present study, we examined the effect of bottom up and top down influences on the effect. In Experiment 1, we found that the anti-Hick's effect is dependent upon the number, as opposed to the configuration, of response alternatives, suggesting that the effect is not a purely bottom up phenomenon. In Experiment 2, we examined whether top down processes, such as expectancy, influence the magnitude and/or direction of the relationship between response alternatives and reaction time. We found that interleaving, as opposed to blocking, the number of alternatives negated the anti-Hick's effect. Taken together, these results suggest that the anti-Hick's effect arises not only from stimulus-based perceptual signals but also from higher-order control signals.

摘要

眼跳潜伏期与反应选择数量之间的关系很复杂。之前,我们发现随着反应选择数量的增加,外源性眼跳潜伏期会缩短(即反 Hick 效应)。在本研究中,我们考察了自下而上和自上而下的影响对该效应的作用。在实验 1 中,我们发现反 Hick 效应取决于反应选择的数量而不是配置,这表明该效应不是纯粹的自下而上的现象。在实验 2 中,我们考察了自上而下的过程(如预期)是否会影响反应选择和反应时间之间关系的大小和/或方向。我们发现,交错排列而不是连续排列选择数量会否定反 Hick 效应。总之,这些结果表明,反 Hick 效应不仅源于基于刺激的感知信号,还源于更高阶的控制信号。

相似文献

1
Manipulations of the relationship between response alternatives and exogenous saccade latencies.操纵反应选择与外源性眼跳潜伏期之间的关系。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Oct;214(2):241-7. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2824-7. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
2
Race to accumulate evidence for few and many saccade alternatives: an exception to speed-accuracy trade-off.竞相积累支持少量和大量扫视替代方案的证据:速度-准确性权衡的一个例外。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Feb;235(2):507-515. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4804-4. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
3
Saccades operate in violation of Hick's law.扫视运动的运作违反了希克定律。
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Oct;146(3):307-14. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1168-8. Epub 2002 Aug 10.
4
An anti-Hick's effect for exogenous, but not endogenous, saccadic eye movements.外源性而非内源性扫视眼动存在反希克效应。
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Jul;204(1):115-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2301-8. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
5
An anti-Hick's effect in monkey and human saccade reaction times.猴子和人类扫视反应时间中的反希克效应。
J Vis. 2008 Mar 27;8(3):26.1-7. doi: 10.1167/8.3.26.
6
Saccades and reaches, behaving differently.扫视和伸手动作,表现各异。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 May;195(3):413-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1804-7. Epub 2009 Apr 30.
7
A memory-based model of Hick's law.基于记忆的希克定律模型。
Cogn Psychol. 2011 May;62(3):193-222. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.11.001.
8
Bottom-up effects modulate saccadic latencies in well-known eye movement paradigm.自下而上的效应调节了广为人知的眼动范式中的眼跳潜伏期。
Psychol Res. 2011 Jul;75(4):272-8. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0305-4. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
9
Effects of stimulus-response uncertainty on saccades to near-threshold targets.刺激-反应不确定性对向近阈值目标的扫视的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Apr;162(3):401-5. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2155-z. Epub 2005 Jan 15.
10
Properties of saccades generated as a choice response.作为选择反应产生的扫视运动的特性。
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Apr;162(3):278-86. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2186-5. Epub 2004 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Race to accumulate evidence for few and many saccade alternatives: an exception to speed-accuracy trade-off.竞相积累支持少量和大量扫视替代方案的证据:速度-准确性权衡的一个例外。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Feb;235(2):507-515. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4804-4. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
2
Response selection in prosaccades, antisaccades, and other volitional saccades.意图性眼球扫视中的反应选择:正扫视、反扫视和其他。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Oct;222(4):345-53. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3218-1. Epub 2012 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
An anti-Hick's effect for exogenous, but not endogenous, saccadic eye movements.外源性而非内源性扫视眼动存在反希克效应。
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Jul;204(1):115-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2301-8. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
2
Top-down control of saccades as part of a generalized model of proactive inhibitory control.自上而下控制眼球跳动,作为主动抑制控制广义模型的一部分。
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Nov;102(5):2578-80. doi: 10.1152/jn.00717.2009. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
3
Proactive inhibitory control and attractor dynamics in countermanding action: a spiking neural circuit model.
反指令动作中的主动抑制控制与吸引子动力学:一个脉冲神经回路模型
J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 15;29(28):9059-71. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6164-08.2009.
4
The effects of bottom-up target luminance and top-down spatial target predictability on saccadic reaction times.自下而上的目标亮度和自上而下的空间目标可预测性对眼跳反应时间的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Aug;197(4):321-35. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1919-x. Epub 2009 Jul 4.
5
Consider the context: blocked versus interleaved presentation of antisaccade trials.考虑以下背景:反扫视试验的分组呈现与交错呈现。
Psychophysiology. 2009 Sep;46(5):1100-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00834.x. Epub 2009 May 28.
6
Saccades and reaches, behaving differently.扫视和伸手动作,表现各异。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 May;195(3):413-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1804-7. Epub 2009 Apr 30.
7
The paradoxical effect of warning on reaction time: demonstrating proactive response inhibition with event-related potentials.警告对反应时间的矛盾效应:用事件相关电位证明主动反应抑制
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;120(4):730-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.02.167. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
8
Proactive inhibitory control of movement assessed by event-related fMRI.通过事件相关功能磁共振成像评估的运动主动抑制控制。
Neuroimage. 2008 Sep 1;42(3):1196-206. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.041. Epub 2008 Jul 11.
9
An anti-Hick's effect in monkey and human saccade reaction times.猴子和人类扫视反应时间中的反希克效应。
J Vis. 2008 Mar 27;8(3):26.1-7. doi: 10.1167/8.3.26.
10
Cueing method biases in visual detection studies.视觉检测研究中的提示方法偏差。
Brain Res. 2007 Nov 7;1179:106-18. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.032. Epub 2007 Aug 21.