Fidell Associates, Woodland Hills, CA 91367, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Aug;130(2):791-806. doi: 10.1121/1.3605673.
Numerous relationships between noise exposure and transportation noise-induced annoyance have been inferred by curve-fitting methods. The present paper develops a different approach. It derives a systematic relationship by applying an a priori, first-principles model to the findings of forty three studies of the annoyance of aviation noise. The rate of change of annoyance with day-night average sound level (DNL) due to aircraft noise exposure was found to closely resemble the rate of change of loudness with sound level. The agreement of model predictions with the findings of recent curve-fitting exercises (cf. Miedma and Vos, 1998) is noteworthy, considering that other analyses have relied on different analytic methods and disparate data sets. Even though annoyance prevalence rates within individual communities consistently grow in proportion to duration-adjusted loudness, variability in annoyance prevalence rates across communities remains great. The present analyses demonstrate that 1) community-specific differences in annoyance prevalence rates can be plausibly attributed to the joint effect of acoustic and non-DNL related factors and (2) a simple model can account for the aggregate influences of non-DNL related factors on annoyance prevalence rates in different communities in terms of a single parameter expressed in DNL units-a "community tolerance level."
已有许多研究通过曲线拟合方法推断出噪声暴露与交通噪声引起的烦恼之间的关系。本文提出了一种不同的方法。它通过将一个先验的、基于第一原理的模型应用于四十三个航空噪声烦恼研究的结果,推导出了一个系统的关系。由于飞机噪声暴露而导致的烦恼随昼夜平均声级(DNL)的变化率与响度随声级的变化率非常相似。该模型的预测结果与最近的曲线拟合研究(见 Miedma 和 Vos,1998)非常吻合,值得注意的是,其他分析方法依赖于不同的分析方法和不同的数据集。尽管个别社区内的烦恼发生率持续按照响度调整后的时间比例增长,但不同社区之间的烦恼发生率的变化仍然很大。本分析表明,1)社区特有的烦恼发生率差异可以合理地归因于声学和非 DNL 相关因素的共同影响,以及 2)一个简单的模型可以用一个以 DNL 为单位表示的单一参数来解释非 DNL 相关因素对不同社区烦恼发生率的综合影响,这个参数称为“社区容忍度”。