• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢曲松与阿洛西林及奈替米星治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少儿童的疗效比较

Ceftriaxone vs. azlocillin and netilmicin in the treatment of febrile neutropenic children.

作者信息

Smith L, Will A M, Williams R F, Stevens R F

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Oncology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, U.K.

出版信息

J Infect. 1990 May;20(3):201-6. doi: 10.1016/0163-4453(90)91019-a.

DOI:10.1016/0163-4453(90)91019-a
PMID:2187928
Abstract

Efficacy of the cephalosporin, ceftriaxone, was compared with that of the combination of the aminoglycoside, netilmicin, and the penicillin, azlocillin, in the treatment of febrile episodes in immunocompromised neutropenic children undergoing chemotherapy for neoplastic disease. During 100 separate febrile episodes, 40 strains of bacteria were isolated from the blood of 34 patients and a further 55 strains from other sites. Nine strains (four of which were staphylococci) to both netilmicin and azlocillin. There was no difference in clinical response between the two therapeutic regimens as assessed 4 and 7 days after treatment began. Ceftriaxone had the considerable practical advantages of once daily dosage without a need for blood monitoring. Ceftriaxone would appear to be effective as initial monotherapy in the treatment of bacterial infections in severely neutropenic children.

摘要

在接受肿瘤疾病化疗的免疫功能低下的中性粒细胞减少儿童发热性疾病的治疗中,对头孢菌素头孢曲松与氨基糖苷类药物奈替米星和青霉素阿洛西林联合用药的疗效进行了比较。在100次单独的发热性疾病发作期间,从34例患者的血液中分离出40株细菌,从其他部位又分离出55株。有9株(其中4株为葡萄球菌)对奈替米星和阿洛西林均耐药。在治疗开始后4天和7天评估时,两种治疗方案的临床反应没有差异。头孢曲松具有每日给药一次且无需进行血液监测的显著实际优势。头孢曲松似乎可作为严重中性粒细胞减少儿童细菌感染治疗的初始单一疗法有效。

相似文献

1
Ceftriaxone vs. azlocillin and netilmicin in the treatment of febrile neutropenic children.头孢曲松与阿洛西林及奈替米星治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少儿童的疗效比较
J Infect. 1990 May;20(3):201-6. doi: 10.1016/0163-4453(90)91019-a.
2
A randomized trial of high-dose ciprofloxacin versus azlocillin and netilmicin in the empirical therapy of febrile neutropenic patients.高剂量环丙沙星与阿洛西林及奈替米星用于发热性中性粒细胞减少患者经验性治疗的随机试验
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992 Aug;30(2):203-14. doi: 10.1093/jac/30.2.203.
3
Netilmicin plus ceftriaxone versus amikacin plus ceftriaxone in the treatment of infections in granulocytopenic patients.奈替米星联合头孢曲松与阿米卡星联合头孢曲松治疗粒细胞缺乏患者感染的比较
Chemotherapy. 1992;38(1):74-6. doi: 10.1159/000238944.
4
A comparison of double beta-lactam combinations with netilmicin/ureidopenicillin regimens in the empirical therapy of febrile neutropenic patients.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 May;23(5):759-71. doi: 10.1093/jac/23.5.759.
5
[Treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic children by ceftazidime combined with netilmicin. Results of a multicenter study apropos of 88 cases].
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1987 May;35(5):648-51.
6
[Treatment of febrile neutropenia episodes in children, with a piperacillin-tazobactam and netilmicin combination].[哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与奈替米星联合治疗儿童发热性中性粒细胞减少症发作]
Med Mal Infect. 2005 Jun;35(6):357-62. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2005.04.004.
7
Cost-effectiveness of cefepime + netilmicin or ceftazidime + amikacin or meropenem monotherapy in febrile neutropenic children with malignancy in Turkey.头孢吡肟+奈替米星或头孢他啶+阿米卡星或美罗培南单药治疗土耳其恶性肿瘤伴发热性中性粒细胞减少儿童的成本效益
J Chemother. 2001 Jun;13(3):281-7. doi: 10.1179/joc.2001.13.3.281.
8
A randomized trial of ciprofloxacin plus azlocillin versus netilmicin plus azlocillin for the empirical treatment of fever in neutropenic patients.环丙沙星联合阿洛西林与奈替米星联合阿洛西林用于中性粒细胞减少患者发热经验性治疗的随机试验
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Aug;28(2):324-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/28.2.324.
9
Ceftazidime as a single agent in the management of children with fever and neutropenia.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983 Jul;12 Suppl A:347-51. doi: 10.1093/jac/12.suppl_a.347.
10
Cost-effectiveness of ceftazidime or imipenem/cilastatin versus ceftriaxone + aminoglycoside in the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients in Germany.德国头孢他啶或亚胺培南/西司他丁与头孢曲松+氨基糖苷类药物治疗中性粒细胞减少癌症患者发热性发作的成本效益
Infection. 1999 Jan-Feb;27(1):23-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02565166.

引用本文的文献

1
Once-a-Day Ceftriaxone-Amikacin Combination as Empiric Antibiotic Therapy to Enable Outpatient Management of Febrile Neutropenia in Children-16-Year Experience from a Single Institute.每日一次头孢曲松 - 阿米卡星联合用药作为经验性抗生素治疗用于儿童发热性中性粒细胞减少症的门诊管理——来自单一机构的16年经验
South Asian J Cancer. 2022 Sep 2;11(4):370-377. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1745834. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Beta-lactam versus beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy in cancer patients with neutropenia.β-内酰胺类药物与β-内酰胺类-氨基糖苷类药物联合治疗癌症中性粒细胞减少症患者的疗效比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 29;2013(6):CD003038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003038.pub2.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of anti-pseudomonal penicillins and carbapenems in pediatric febrile neutropenia.
抗假单胞菌青霉素和碳青霉烯类药物在儿童发热性中性粒细胞减少症中的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Oct;20(10):2295-304. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1333-3. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
4
Management of febrile neutropenia in low risk cancer patients.低风险癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症的管理
Thorax. 2000 Aug;55 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S63-9. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.suppl_1.s63.
5
Once daily ceftriaxone and gentamicin for the treatment of febrile neutropenia.每日一次使用头孢曲松和庆大霉素治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少症。
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Feb;80(2):125-31. doi: 10.1136/adc.80.2.125.
6
Drug utilisation review (DUR) of the third generation cephalosporins. Focus on ceftriaxone, ceftazidime and cefotaxime.第三代头孢菌素的药物利用评价。重点关注头孢曲松、头孢他啶和头孢噻肟。
Drugs. 1995 Sep;50(3):423-39. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199550030-00002.