Prince R J, Guastello S J
Department of Psychology, Marquette University.
J Psychol. 1990 Mar;124(2):217-22. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1990.10543218.
Twelve psychiatric outpatients were administered the Rorschach test, and results were interpreted using the Exner (1983, 1986) Report for the Comprehensive System computer-based test interpretation (CBTI) program. Four psychiatrists made accuracy ratings for both real and bogus reports for each of their patients. Data were analyzed using two-way analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs), where report type was a repeated main effect, psychiatrist was a random main effect, and the number of statements in the report was the covariate. Results indicated that this CBTI provided only 5% discriminating power for any one patient, with 60% of the interpretive statements merely describing typical characteristics of the outpatient population. No significant psychiatrist, interaction, or covariate effects were encountered.
12名精神科门诊患者接受了罗夏墨迹测验,结果使用基于计算机的综合系统测验解释(CBTI)程序的埃克斯纳(1983年、1986年)报告进行解释。四位精神科医生对每位患者的真实报告和虚假报告进行了准确性评级。使用双向协方差分析(ANCOVA)对数据进行分析,其中报告类型是重复的主效应,精神科医生是随机主效应,报告中的陈述数量是协变量。结果表明,这种CBTI对任何一位患者的辨别力仅为5%,60%的解释性陈述仅仅描述了门诊患者群体的典型特征。未发现显著的精神科医生、交互作用或协变量效应。