• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的评估:国家综合癌症网络实践指南对根治性前列腺切除术时盆腔淋巴结清扫术的适应证。

A population-based assessment of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guideline indications for pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy.

机构信息

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Department of Urology, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2012 Apr;109(8):1177-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10518.x. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10518.x
PMID:21880105
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the ability of the threshold recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) in correctly predicting histologically-confirmed lymph node invasion (LNI). The 2010 NCCN practice guidelines for prostate cancer recommend a pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at radical prostatectomy in all individuals with a nomogram predicted LNI risk of ≥2%.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We assessed 20,877 patients who were treated with radical prostatectomy and PLND between 2004 and 2006, within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. The 2% nomogram threshold, as well as other threshold values (range 1-10%) were tested. Finally, we externally validated the NCCN guideline nomogram.

RESULTS

Overall, 2.5% of patients had LNI. The use of the 2% threshold would allow the avoidance of 23% of PLNDs, at the cost of missing 1.7% of patients with LNI. Conversely, the use of a 3% threshold would allow the avoidance of 58% of PLNDs, at the cost of missing 15% of patients with LNI vs 72% and 26%, respectively, for the 4% threshold. Overall, the accuracy of the NCCN guideline nomogram quantified according to the receiver-operator characteristics-derived area under the curve was 82%.

CONCLUSIONS

In a population-based sample, the NCCN guideline nomogram is highly accurate. However, the 2% threshold will permit the avoidance of only 23% of PLNDs, instead of the 48% intended by the NCCN guidelines. The use of a 3% threshold may allow a lower rate of PLND overtreatment, although it will miss more patients with LNI.

摘要

目的

研究国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)推荐的阈值在正确预测组织学证实的淋巴结侵犯(LNI)方面的能力。2010 年 NCCN 前列腺癌实践指南建议在所有预测 LNI 风险≥2%的患者中,在根治性前列腺切除术中进行盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)。

患者和方法

我们评估了 20877 例 2004 年至 2006 年期间在监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中接受根治性前列腺切除术和 PLND 治疗的患者。测试了 2%的列线图阈值和其他阈值(范围为 1-10%)。最后,我们对外科 NCCN 指南列线图进行了验证。

结果

总体而言,2.5%的患者存在 LNI。使用 2%的阈值可以避免 23%的 PLND,但会漏诊 1.7%的 LNI 患者。相反,使用 3%的阈值可以避免 58%的 PLND,但会漏诊 15%的 LNI 患者,而 4%的阈值分别为 72%和 26%。总体而言,根据接收者操作特征曲线下面积定量的 NCCN 指南列线图的准确性为 82%。

结论

在基于人群的样本中,NCCN 指南列线图具有高度准确性。然而,2%的阈值只能避免 23%的 PLND,而不是 NCCN 指南所设想的 48%。使用 3%的阈值可能会降低 PLND 过度治疗的发生率,但会漏诊更多的 LNI 患者。

相似文献

1
A population-based assessment of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guideline indications for pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy.基于人群的评估:国家综合癌症网络实践指南对根治性前列腺切除术时盆腔淋巴结清扫术的适应证。
BJU Int. 2012 Apr;109(8):1177-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10518.x. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
2
Critical assessment of the European Association of Urology guideline indications for pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy.欧洲泌尿外科学会根治性前列腺切除术盆腔淋巴结清扫指征指南的批判性评估。
BJU Int. 2011 Dec;108(11):1769-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10204.x. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
3
Head-to-head comparison of three commonly used preoperative tools for prediction of lymph node invasion at radical prostatectomy.三种常用于预测根治性前列腺切除术时淋巴结侵犯的术前工具的头对头比较。
Urology. 2011 Dec;78(6):1363-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.1423.
4
Adherence to pelvic lymph node dissection recommendations according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network pelvic lymph node dissection guideline and the D'Amico lymph node invasion risk stratification.根据美国国立综合癌症网络盆腔淋巴结清扫指南和达米科淋巴结侵犯风险分层,遵循盆腔淋巴结清扫建议。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Feb;36(2):81.e17-81.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.022. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
5
Predicting the risk of lymph node invasion during radical prostatectomy using the European Association of Urology guideline nomogram: a validation study.使用欧洲泌尿外科学会指南列线图预测根治性前列腺切除术中的淋巴结侵犯风险:验证研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jul;38(7):624-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 Apr 22.
6
North American Population-Based Validation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Practice Guideline Recommendation of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Contemporary Prostate Cancer.基于北美人群对国家综合癌症网络当代前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结清扫术实践指南建议的验证
Prostate. 2017 Apr;77(5):542-548. doi: 10.1002/pros.23292. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
7
National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guidelines 2011: Need for more accurate recommendations for pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.国家综合癌症网络实践指南 2011:前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结清扫术需要更准确的推荐。
J Urol. 2012 Aug;188(2):423-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.129. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
8
Indications for pelvic nodal treatment in prostate cancer should change. Validation of the Roach formula in a large extended nodal dissection series.前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结治疗的适应证应改变。在大型扩大淋巴结清扫系列中验证 Roach 公式。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jun 1;83(2):624-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.2014. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
9
External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.预测接受扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的前列腺癌患者淋巴结侵犯的更新列线图的外部验证
Urol Int. 2013;90(3):277-82. doi: 10.1159/000343993. Epub 2012 Dec 22.
10
Performance characteristics of computed tomography in detecting lymph node metastases in contemporary patients with prostate cancer treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection.当代接受扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗的前列腺癌患者中 CT 检测淋巴结转移的性能特征。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jun;61(6):1132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.008. Epub 2011 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Single Positive Lymph Node Prostate Cancer Can Be Treated Surgically without Recurrence.单阳性淋巴结前列腺癌可通过手术治疗且无复发。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152391. eCollection 2016.
2
Prostate cancer nomograms: a review of their use in cancer detection and treatment.前列腺癌列线图:在癌症检测和治疗中的应用综述。
Curr Urol Rep. 2014 Mar;15(3):391. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0391-0.
3
Functional imaging for prostate cancer: therapeutic implications.前列腺癌的功能影像学:治疗意义。
Semin Nucl Med. 2012 Sep;42(5):328-42. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2012.04.004.