Suppr超能文献

安大略省大流行性流感和季节性流感疫苗接种期间电子和混合数据采集系统的成本比较。

A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns.

机构信息

Department of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 1;11:210. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-210.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination campaign, health regions in Canada collected client-level immunization data using fully electronic or hybrid systems, with the latter comprising both electronic and paper-based elements. The objective of our evaluation was to compare projected five-year costs associated with implementing these systems in Ontario public health units (PHUs) during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns.

METHODS

Six PHUs provided equipment and staffing costs during the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination campaign and staffing algorithms for seasonal campaigns. We standardized resources to population sizes 100,000, 500,000 and 1,000,000, assuming equipment lifetime of five years and public health vaccine administration rates of 18% and 2.5% for H1N1 and seasonal campaigns, respectively. Two scenarios were considered: Year 1 pandemic and Year 1 seasonal campaigns, each followed by four regular influenza seasons. Costs were discounted at 5%.

RESULTS

Assuming a Year 1 pandemic, the five-year costs per capita for the electronic system decrease as PHU population size increases, becoming increasingly less costly than hybrid systems ($4.33 vs. $4.34 [100,000], $4.17 vs. $4.34 [500,000], $4.12 vs. $4.34 [1,000, 000]). The same trend is observed for the scenario reflecting five seasonal campaigns, with the electronic system being less expensive per capita than the hybrid system for all population sizes ($1.93 vs. $1.95 [100,000], $1.91 vs. $1.94 [500,000], $1.87 vs. $1.94 [1,000, 000]). Sensitivity analyses identified factors related to nurse hours as affecting the direction and magnitude of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year cost projections for electronic systems were comparable or less expensive than for hybrid systems, at all PHU population sizes. An intangible benefit of the electronic system is having data rapidly available for reporting.

摘要

背景

在 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感大流行疫苗接种期间,加拿大各地区使用全电子或混合系统收集客户层面的免疫数据,后者包括电子和纸质元素。我们评估的目的是比较在安大略省公共卫生单位(PHU)实施这些系统在大流行和季节性流感疫苗接种期间的五年预期成本。

方法

六家 PHU 提供了 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感大流行疫苗接种期间的设备和人员配备成本,以及季节性疫苗接种的人员配备算法。我们将资源标准化为 10 万人、50 万人和 100 万人的人口规模,假设设备使用寿命为五年,公共卫生疫苗接种率分别为甲型 H1N1 大流行和季节性疫苗接种的 18%和 2.5%。考虑了两种情况:第 1 年大流行和第 1 年季节性疫苗接种,每个疫苗接种后均有四个常规流感季节。成本贴现率为 5%。

结果

假设第 1 年大流行,电子系统的人均五年成本随着 PHU 人口规模的增加而降低,与混合系统相比变得越来越便宜($4.33 与 $4.34 [100,000],$4.17 与 $4.34 [500,000],$4.12 与 $4.34 [1,000,000])。对于反映五个季节性疫苗接种的情况,也观察到了同样的趋势,对于所有人口规模,电子系统的人均成本均低于混合系统($1.93 与 $1.95 [100,000],$1.91 与 $1.94 [500,000],$1.87 与 $1.94 [1,000,000])。敏感性分析确定了与护士工时相关的因素,这些因素会影响结果的方向和大小。

结论

在所有 PHU 人口规模下,电子系统的五年成本预测与混合系统相比具有可比性或成本更低。电子系统的一个无形效益是能够快速获得数据以进行报告。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a904/3179703/22609c3565b6/1472-6963-11-210-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验