• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当正确还不够:四岁儿童能够区分有知识的信息提供者和仅仅准确的信息提供者。

When being right is not enough: four-year-olds distinguish knowledgeable informants from merely accurate informants.

机构信息

Oxford Brookes University, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Oxford OX3 0BP, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2011 Oct;22(10):1250-3. doi: 10.1177/0956797611416998. Epub 2011 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1177/0956797611416998
PMID:21881060
Abstract

Recent evidence demonstrates that children are selective in their social learning, preferring to learn from a previously accurate speaker than from a previously inaccurate one. We examined whether children assessing speakers' reliability take into account how speakers achieved their prior accuracy. In Study 1, when faced with two accurate informants, 4- and 5-year-olds (but not 3-year-olds) were more likely to seek novel information from an informant who had previously given the answers unaided than from an informant who had always relied on help from a third party. Similarly, in Study 2, 4-year-olds were more likely to trust the testimony of an unaided informant over the testimony provided by an assisted informant. Our results indicate that when children reach around 4 years of age, their selective trust extends beyond simple generalizations based on informants' past accuracy to a more sophisticated selectivity that distinguishes between truly knowledgeable informants and merely accurate informants who may not be reliable in the long term.

摘要

最近的证据表明,儿童在社会学习中具有选择性,他们更喜欢向之前准确的说话者学习,而不是向之前不准确的说话者学习。我们研究了儿童在评估说话者的可靠性时是否会考虑说话者如何获得之前的准确性。在研究 1 中,当面对两个准确的信息提供者时,4 岁和 5 岁的儿童(而不是 3 岁的儿童)更有可能从之前独立给出答案的信息提供者那里寻求新信息,而不是从总是依赖第三方帮助的信息提供者那里寻求新信息。同样,在研究 2 中,4 岁的儿童更有可能信任独立信息提供者的证言,而不是依赖辅助信息提供者的证言。我们的研究结果表明,当儿童长到 4 岁左右时,他们的选择性信任不仅基于信息提供者过去的准确性,还扩展到更复杂的选择性,能够区分真正有知识的信息提供者和仅仅准确但可能不可靠的信息提供者。

相似文献

1
When being right is not enough: four-year-olds distinguish knowledgeable informants from merely accurate informants.当正确还不够:四岁儿童能够区分有知识的信息提供者和仅仅准确的信息提供者。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Oct;22(10):1250-3. doi: 10.1177/0956797611416998. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
2
In the absence of conflicting testimony young children trust inaccurate informants.在没有相互矛盾的证词的情况下,幼儿会信任不准确的告密者。
Dev Sci. 2014 May;17(3):443-51. doi: 10.1111/desc.12134. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
3
Gaining knowledge via other minds: children's flexible trust in others as sources of information.通过他人获取知识:儿童对他人作为信息来源的灵活信任。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;29(Pt 4):961-80. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02036.x. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
4
Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers.学龄前儿童不信任无知和不准确的说话者。
Child Dev. 2005 Nov-Dec;76(6):1261-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00849.x.
5
Five-year-olds are willing, but 4-year-olds refuse, to trust informants who offer new and unfamiliar labels for parts of the body.5 岁的儿童愿意信任提供身体部位新的不熟悉标签的信息提供者,而 4 岁的儿童则拒绝信任。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Oct;116(2):234-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
6
Selective trust: children's use of intention and outcome of past testimony.选择性信任:儿童对过去证言的意图和结果的使用。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar;49(3):439-45. doi: 10.1037/a0031615. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
7
Preschoolers continue to trust a more accurate informant 1 week after exposure to accuracy information.在接触准确性信息一周后,学龄前儿童仍然信任提供更准确信息的人。
Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):188-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00763.x.
8
Preschoolers trust novel members of accurate speakers' groups and judge them favourably.学龄前儿童信任准确表达者群体中的新成员,并对他们做出积极评价。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 May;67(5):872-83. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.836234.
9
Trust.信任。
Dev Sci. 2007 Jan;10(1):135-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00575.x.
10
Trust in testimony about strangers: young children prefer reliable informants who make positive attributions.对陌生人证词的信任:幼儿更喜欢做出积极归因的可靠信息提供者。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Mar;111(3):543-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Who Peeked? Children Infer the Likely Cause of Improbable Success.谁在偷看?儿童推断出不太可能成功的可能原因。
Dev Sci. 2025 Jan;28(1):e13598. doi: 10.1111/desc.13598.
2
Testimony bias lingers across development under uncertainty.在不确定的情况下,证词偏见会在整个发展过程中持续存在。
Dev Psychol. 2021 Dec;57(12):2150-2164. doi: 10.1037/dev0001253.
3
Knowing How You Know: Toddlers Reevaluate Words Learned From an Unreliable Speaker.了解你如何知晓:幼儿会重新评估从不可靠说话者那里学到的词汇。
Open Mind (Camb). 2021 Feb 1;5:1-19. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00038. eCollection 2021.
4
(In)Sensitivity to Accuracy? Children's and Adults' Decisions About Who to Trust: The Teacher or the Internet.对准确性的(不)敏感?儿童和成人关于信任对象的决策:教师还是互联网。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 28;11:551131. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.551131. eCollection 2020.
5
Varieties of trust in preschoolers' learning and practical decisions.学龄前儿童在学习和实际决策中的信任多样性。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 20;13(8):e0202506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202506. eCollection 2018.
6
What I don't know won't hurt you: The relation between professed ignorance and later knowledge claims.我不知道的事不会伤害到你:宣称的无知与后来的知识主张之间的关系。
Dev Psychol. 2017 May;53(5):826-835. doi: 10.1037/dev0000294. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
7
Is a Bird an Apple? The Effect of Speaker Labeling Accuracy on Infants' Word Learning, Imitation, and Helping Behaviors.鸟是苹果吗?说话者标签准确性对婴儿词汇学习、模仿和帮助行为的影响。
Infancy. 2013 Aug;18(Suppl 1):E46-E68. doi: 10.1111/infa.12027. Epub 2013 May 8.
8
Children's picture interpretation: Appearance or intention?儿童图片解读:外观还是意图?
Dev Psychol. 2015 Sep;51(9):1201-15. doi: 10.1037/a0039571. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
9
Does the majority always know best? Young children's flexible trust in majority opinion.多数人总是最正确的吗?幼儿对多数意见的灵活信任。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 12;9(8):e104585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104585. eCollection 2014.
10
Rethinking conformity and imitation: divergence, convergence, and social understanding.重新思考从众与模仿:分歧、趋同与社会理解。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 8;5:726. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00726. eCollection 2014.