Suppr超能文献

亚利桑那州南部商业和实验性白蚁监测器对沙漠地下白蚁 Heterotermes aureus(等翅目:鼻白蚁科)的有效性。

Effectiveness of commercial and experimental termite monitors for the desert subterranean termite Heterotermes aureus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in southern Arizona.

机构信息

Department of Entomology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85720, USA.

出版信息

J Econ Entomol. 2011 Aug;104(4):1339-42. doi: 10.1603/ec10378.

Abstract

In Arizona, the subterranean termite Heterotermes aureus (Snyder) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) is the most economically important termite pest. We report here the evaluation of several commercial and experimental monitoring stations to capture and monitor H. aureus. In total, 12 monitoring stations were evaluated over two study periods. In 2001-2002, the commercial monitors Firstline and Termicon did not capture any H. aureus, whereas Termitrol did not capture significantly more termites than these two monitors. In contrast, three experimental Arizona Research Monitoring Stations (ARMS)--ARMS-PINE, ARMS-ASH, and ARMS-BBT--captured significantly more termites than Firstline and Termicon, and ARMS-BBT captured termites significantly more frequently than the commercial monitors. Similarly in 2003, the commercial monitors Firstline and Defender did not capture any H. aureus, whereas Extera did not capture significantly more termites than these two monitors. However, four monitor designs including the three most successful ARMS in 2001-2002 captured significantly more termites than Firstline and Defender, and ARMS-ASH captured termites significantly more often than the commercial monitors. On-ground ARMS monitors in general captured significantly more termites than commercial in-ground stations.

摘要

在亚利桑那州,地下白蚁 Heterotermes aureus(Snyder)(等翅目: Rhinotermitidae)是最具经济重要性的白蚁害虫。我们在此报告了对几种商业和实验性监测站的评估,以捕获和监测 H. aureus。在两个研究期间共评估了 12 个监测站。在 2001-2002 年,商业监测器 Firstline 和 Termicon 没有捕获到任何 H. aureus,而 Termitrol 没有比这两个监测器捕获到更多的白蚁。相比之下,三个实验性亚利桑那州研究监测站(ARMS)-ARMS-PINE、ARMS-ASH 和 ARMS-BBT-比 Firstline 和 Termicon 捕获到更多的白蚁,而 ARMS-BBT 比商业监测器更频繁地捕获到白蚁。同样在 2003 年,商业监测器 Firstline 和 Defender 没有捕获到任何 H. aureus,而 Extera 没有比这两个监测器捕获到更多的白蚁。然而,包括 2001-2002 年最成功的三个 ARMS 在内的四种监测器设计比 Firstline 和 Defender 捕获到更多的白蚁,而 ARMS-ASH 比商业监测器更频繁地捕获到白蚁。地面 ARMS 监测器总体上比商业地面站捕获到更多的白蚁。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验