Department of Urology , Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan.
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(9):1349-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10534.x. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
Study Type--Therapy (case series). Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? A randomized prospective phase III clinical trial for systemic treatment-naïve metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) patients demonstrated the superiority of sunitinib over interferon with an acceptable safety profile. However, a commonly asked question is whether patients with RCC in clinical trials are representative of those with this disease being seen in ordinary clinical practice. To our knowledge, this is the first report of sunitinib for the Japanese patients with metastatic RCC in ordinary clinical practice. The estimated median PFS and OS in this study were 9.3 and 32.2 months, respectively. The application of the MSKCC model distinctly separated OS curves (P<0.001), suggesting that MSKCC prognostic factors might be still valid to predict survival in metastatic RCC in the era of molecular targeted therapy.
• To report the treatment efficacy and safety profile of sunitinib for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in ordinary clinical practice. • In addition, to investigate the prognostic clinicopathological factors in these patients.
• The present study consisted of native Japanese patients with metastatic RCC, comprising 29 pretreated and 34 systemic treatment-naïve patients. • Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model, respectively.
• Estimated median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 9.3 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 5.0-13.7) and 32.2 months (95% CI, 24.4-40.0), respectively. • Among the patients pretreated before sunitinib, two patients were treated with initialized systemic therapy with sorafenib and the remaining 27 were initialized with interferon-α. • The OS from the initial systemic therapy of the patients in pretreated groups was 79.6 months (95% CI, 14.6-144.5). • The application of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center model distinctly separated the OS curves (P < 0.001). • The most common grade 3 adverse events were fatigue (53%), thrombocytopaenia (48%), hand-foot syndrome (16%), anaemia (20%), hypertension (10%) and leucopaenia (9%), although these events were manageable and reversible.
• Sunitinib has a favourable efficacy/safety profile for Japanese metastatic RCC patients in clinical practice. • The estimated median OS was >2 years with acceptable tolerability. • The median OS from the initial systemic therapy of the pretreated patients was >6 years. • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center prognostic factors still appear to be valid for predicting survival in metastatic RCC in the era of molecular targeted therapy.
研究类型-治疗(病例系列)。证据水平 4. 目前已知的是什么?本研究有何补充?一项针对初治转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的全身性治疗的随机前瞻性 III 期临床试验表明,舒尼替尼优于干扰素,且安全性可接受。然而,人们经常会问一个问题,即临床试验中的 RCC 患者是否与普通临床实践中所见的患者具有代表性。据我们所知,这是第一项关于转移性 RCC 日本患者在普通临床实践中应用舒尼替尼的报告。本研究中估计的中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为 9.3 和 32.2 个月。MSKCC 模型的应用明显分离了 OS 曲线(P<0.001),这表明 MSKCC 预后因素在分子靶向治疗时代仍然可以有效地预测转移性 RCC 的生存。
• 报告舒尼替尼治疗普通临床实践中转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的疗效和安全性。• 此外,还研究了这些患者的预后临床病理因素。
• 本研究包括 29 例预处理和 34 例初治转移性 RCC 的日本本土患者。• 通过对数秩检验和 Cox 比例风险模型分别进行单变量和多变量分析。
• 估计的中位无进展生存期和总生存期(OS)分别为 9.3 个月(95%置信区间,CI,5.0-13.7)和 32.2 个月(95%CI,24.4-40.0)。• 在舒尼替尼治疗前的患者中,有 2 例患者接受了索拉非尼初始系统性治疗,其余 27 例患者接受了干扰素-α初始治疗。• 预处理组患者初始系统性治疗的 OS 为 79.6 个月(95%CI,14.6-144.5)。• MSKCC 模型的应用明显分离了 OS 曲线(P<0.001)。• 最常见的 3 级不良事件为乏力(53%)、血小板减少(48%)、手足综合征(16%)、贫血(20%)、高血压(10%)和白细胞减少(9%),尽管这些事件是可管理和可逆的。
• 舒尼替尼在日本转移性 RCC 患者的临床实践中具有良好的疗效/安全性。• 估计的中位 OS 超过 2 年,耐受性良好。• 预处理患者初始系统性治疗的中位 OS 超过 6 年。• MSKCC 预后因素在分子靶向治疗时代仍然适用于预测转移性 RCC 的生存。