Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mol Ecol Resour. 2012 Jan;12(1):123-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03063.x. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
High-fidelity 'proofreading' polymerases are often used in library construction for next-generation sequencing projects, in an effort to minimize errors in the resulting sequence data. The increased template fidelity of these polymerases can come at the cost of reduced template specificity, and library preparation methods based on the AFLP technique may be particularly susceptible. Here, we compare AFLP profiles generated with standard Taq and two versions of a high-fidelity polymerase. We find that Taq produces fewer and brighter peaks than high-fidelity polymerase, suggesting that Taq performs better at selectively amplifying templates that exactly match the primer sequences. Because the higher accuracy of proofreading polymerases remains important for sequencing applications, we suggest that it may be more effective to use alternative library preparation methods.
高保真“校对”聚合酶常用于下一代测序项目的文库构建,以尽量减少所得序列数据中的错误。这些聚合酶的模板保真度增加可能会导致模板特异性降低,而基于 AFLP 技术的文库制备方法可能特别容易受到影响。在这里,我们比较了使用标准 Taq 和两种高保真聚合酶生成的 AFLP 图谱。我们发现 Taq 产生的峰比高保真聚合酶少且亮,这表明 Taq 能够更好地选择性扩增与引物序列完全匹配的模板。由于校对聚合酶的更高准确性对于测序应用仍然很重要,因此我们建议使用替代文库制备方法可能更有效。