Alliant International University, Clinical Psychology, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Fam Process. 2011 Sep;50(3):353-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2011.01365.x.
This study examined the differences among lesbians, gay men, and heterosexuals at two points in time (1975 and 2000) using responses of 6,864 participants from two archival data sets. Groups were compared on variables representing equality of behaviors between partners in seven realms: traditionally "feminine" housework, traditionally "masculine" housework, finances, support, communication, requesting/refusing sex, and decision-making. In addition, the current study compared monogamy agreements and monogamy behaviors reported by the two cohorts of couple types. Overall, the results indicate that on the equality variables, there have been many statistically significant behavioral shifts among the different sexual orientations across 25 years. In addition, all couple types reported substantially greater rates of monogamy in the year 2000 than in 1975. The present study has important clinical implications for therapists working with couples because it provides new baseline evidence regarding how couples now interact with one another (especially about monogamy) and how this has shifted over time. In addition, it elucidates the differences that still exist between different couple types, which could serve to inform couple therapists as they strive to become more culturally competent working with same-sex couples.
本研究使用来自两个档案数据集的 6864 名参与者的回复,在两个时间点(1975 年和 2000 年)检查了女同性恋者、男同性恋者和异性恋者之间的差异。在七个领域中,对代表伴侣之间行为平等的变量进行了比较:传统的“女性化”家务、传统的“男性化”家务、财务、支持、沟通、请求/拒绝性行为和决策。此外,本研究比较了两组伴侣类型报告的一夫一妻制协议和一夫一妻制行为。总体而言,研究结果表明,在 25 年的时间里,不同性取向在平等变量上发生了许多具有统计学意义的行为转变。此外,所有伴侣类型在 2000 年报告的一夫一妻制比例都明显高于 1975 年。本研究对与夫妇合作的治疗师具有重要的临床意义,因为它提供了关于夫妇现在如何相互互动(尤其是关于一夫一妻制)以及随着时间的推移如何发生这种变化的新的基线证据。此外,它阐明了不同伴侣类型之间仍然存在的差异,这可以为夫妇治疗师提供信息,因为他们努力在与同性伴侣合作时更具文化能力。