Memorial Medical Center, Wound Healing Center, Johnstown, PA 15901, USA.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2011 Sep;43(3):292-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01409.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
Medication reconciliation is a process to reduce errors and harm associated with loss of medication information as the patient enters and moves through the healthcare system. This study examines medication list accuracy upon hospital admission.
This prospective study enrolled 75 English-speaking medical and surgical patients (18 years of age or older) who were taking prescription medications. The study took place at a rural, tertiary teaching hospital in the northeastern United States. Data collection occurred from November 2006 to March 2009.
Nursing admission team medication lists were reconciled with primary care physician (PCP) and outpatient pharmacy (OP) lists. Outcome measures were accuracy of medication history generated by admission nurses (ANs) compared with PCP and OP lists, and identification of factors influencing probability of accurate medication list generation by ANs. The Generalized Estimating Equations modeling approach was used to compare AN, OP, and PCP medication list accuracy. Additionally, sex and age were analyzed as covariates and included in the model.
Forty-five males and 30 females (N= 75) with a mean age of 60 years (SD 15) participated. Fifty-seven subjects (76%) used over-the-counter or herbal medications, but the AN recorded only 31 (41%) cases. Patients received outpatient care from 1 to 12 providers. Forty patients (67%) obtained medications from one pharmacy, 22 (29%) from two, and 3 (4%) from three pharmacies. OP medication lists were completely accurate more often than PCP but not AN lists (19/75 [25%] OP vs. 6/75 [8%] PCP vs. 14/75 [19%] AN; 95% confidence interval [CI] of the difference [0.07, 0.50]). No difference between AN and PCP list accuracy was found. Completely accurate AN lists were more than twice as likely with male and younger patients (95% CI of the difference [1.07, 6.22] and [0.94, 0.99], respectively).
Like other studies, this study showed admission medication reconciliation lists are often inaccurate. Our results suggest that verification of admission medication lists with outpatient provider lists may improve accuracy. Patients, with guidance from outpatient care providers, should assume accountability for maintaining accurate medication lists. A secure, universal, interactive electronic medical record may be a future solution for organizing and sharing medication data between providers.
Medication reconciliation upon inpatient admission remains a high-volume and high-acuity problem. We found that not only hospital medication lists, but source lists, including those maintained by the patient, the PCP, and the OP, are vastly inaccurate.
药物重整是一个过程,旨在减少因患者在进入和贯穿医疗系统时丢失药物信息而导致的错误和伤害。本研究检查了入院时的药物清单准确性。
本前瞻性研究纳入了 75 名讲英语的内科和外科患者(18 岁或以上),他们正在服用处方药。该研究在美国东北部的一家农村三级教学医院进行。数据收集于 2006 年 11 月至 2009 年 3 月进行。
护理入院团队的药物清单与初级保健医生(PCP)和门诊药房(OP)的清单进行核对。主要观察指标是入院护士(AN)生成的药物史准确性与 PCP 和 OP 清单的比较,以及确定影响 AN 生成准确药物清单概率的因素。使用广义估计方程建模方法比较 AN、OP 和 PCP 的药物清单准确性。此外,还分析了性别和年龄作为协变量,并纳入了模型。
共有 75 名男性和 30 名女性(N=75)参与,平均年龄为 60 岁(SD 15)。57 名患者(76%)使用非处方或草药药物,但 AN 仅记录了 31 例(41%)。患者接受了 1 至 12 名提供者的门诊护理。40 名患者(67%)从一家药房获得药物,22 名(29%)从两家药房获得药物,3 名(4%)从三家药房获得药物。OP 药物清单比 PCP 但不是 AN 更准确(19/75[25%]OP 与 6/75[8%]PCP 与 14/75[19%]AN;95%置信区间[CI]差值[0.07,0.50])。AN 和 PCP 清单准确性之间没有差异。具有男性和年轻患者的完全准确的 AN 清单的可能性要高出两倍以上(95%CI 差值分别为[1.07,6.22]和[0.94,0.99])。
与其他研究一样,本研究表明入院药物重整清单通常不准确。我们的结果表明,与门诊提供者清单核对入院药物清单可能会提高准确性。患者在门诊护理提供者的指导下,应承担维护准确药物清单的责任。安全、通用、互动的电子病历可能是解决提供者之间药物数据组织和共享问题的未来解决方案。
入院时的药物重整仍然是一个高容量和高紧急性的问题。我们发现,不仅是医院的药物清单,包括患者、PCP 和 OP 维护的来源清单,都存在极大的不准确。