• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿舍利石器更早的起源。

An earlier origin for the Acheulian.

机构信息

Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, New York 10964, USA.

出版信息

Nature. 2011 Aug 31;477(7362):82-5. doi: 10.1038/nature10372.

DOI:10.1038/nature10372
PMID:21886161
Abstract

The Acheulian is one of the first defined prehistoric techno-complexes and is characterized by shaped bifacial stone tools. It probably originated in Africa, spreading to Europe and Asia perhaps as early as ∼1 million years (Myr) ago. The origin of the Acheulian is thought to have closely coincided with major changes in human brain evolution, allowing for further technological developments. Nonetheless, the emergence of the Acheulian remains unclear because well-dated sites older than 1.4 Myr ago are scarce. Here we report on the lithic assemblage and geological context for the Kokiselei 4 archaeological site from the Nachukui formation (West Turkana, Kenya) that bears characteristic early Acheulian tools and pushes the first appearance datum for this stone-age technology back to 1.76 Myr ago. Moreover, co-occurrence of Oldowan and Acheulian artefacts at the Kokiselei site complex indicates that the two technologies are not mutually exclusive time-successive components of an evolving cultural lineage, and suggests that the Acheulian was either imported from another location yet to be identified or originated from Oldowan hominins at this vicinity. In either case, the Acheulian did not accompany the first human dispersal from Africa despite being available at the time. This may indicate that multiple groups of hominins distinguished by separate stone-tool-making behaviours and dispersal strategies coexisted in Africa at 1.76 Myr ago.

摘要

阿舍利技术是最早定义的史前技术复合体之一,其特点是具有两面器形的石器。它可能起源于非洲,早在约 100 万年前就传播到了欧洲和亚洲。阿舍利技术的起源与人类大脑进化的重大变化密切相关,这使得技术进一步发展成为可能。尽管如此,阿舍利技术的出现仍然不清楚,因为早于 140 万年前的年代准确的遗址非常稀少。在这里,我们报告了来自 Nachukui 组(肯尼亚 West Turkana)的 Kokiselei 4 考古遗址的石器组合和地质背景,该遗址有典型的早期阿舍利工具,将这种石器时代技术的首次出现时间追溯到了 176 万年前。此外,在 Kokiselei 遗址复合体中同时出现了奥杜威技术和阿舍利技术的工具,这表明这两种技术不是相互排斥的、时间上相继的文化传承的组成部分,这表明阿舍利技术要么是从尚未确定的另一个地点传入的,要么是由附近的奥杜威人类起源的。在任何一种情况下,尽管阿舍利技术在当时已经存在,但它并没有伴随着第一批人类从非洲扩散。这可能表明,在 176 万年前,非洲存在着多个以不同石器制造行为和扩散策略为特征的人类群体。

相似文献

1
An earlier origin for the Acheulian.阿舍利石器更早的起源。
Nature. 2011 Aug 31;477(7362):82-5. doi: 10.1038/nature10372.
2
Before the Acheulean: The emergence of bifacial shaping at Kokiselei 6 (1.8 Ma), West Turkana, Kenya.阿舍利文化期工艺出现之前:肯尼亚西图尔卡纳的科基塞利6号遗址(距今180万年)双面石器制作工艺的出现。
J Hum Evol. 2021 Oct;159:103061. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.103061. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
3
Tephrostratigraphy and the Acheulian to middle stone age transition in the Kapthurin Formation, Kenya.肯尼亚卡普图林组的火山灰地层学与阿舍利文化至中石器时代的过渡
J Hum Evol. 2002 Jan-Feb;42(1-2):211-35. doi: 10.1006/jhev.2001.0513.
4
An earlier origin for stone tool making: implications for cognitive evolution and the transition to Homo.石器制造的更早起源:对认知进化及向人属过渡的启示
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jul 5;371(1698). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0233.
5
Pedogenic carbonate stable isotopic evidence for wooded habitat preference of early Pleistocene tool makers in the Turkana Basin.土壤碳酸盐稳定同位素证据表明,更新世早期的工具制造者偏爱在图尔卡纳盆地的林地居住。
J Hum Evol. 2013 Jul;65(1):65-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 May 31.
6
Early hominid stone tool production and technical skill 2.34 Myr ago in West Turkana, Kenya.234万年前在肯尼亚的图尔卡纳湖西部地区早期原始人类的石器制作与技术技能。
Nature. 1999 May 6;399(6731):57-60. doi: 10.1038/19959.
7
Continuity and change in lithic techno-economy of the early Acheulian on the Ethiopian highland: A case study from locality MW2; the Melka Wakena site-complex.埃塞俄比亚高原阿舍利早期石器技术经济的连续性和变化:以梅尔克瓦凯纳遗址综合体 MW2 为例
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 7;17(12):e0277029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277029. eCollection 2022.
8
Woodworking activities by early humans: a plant residue analysis on Acheulian stone tools from Peninj (Tanzania).早期人类的木工活动:对来自坦桑尼亚佩宁吉的阿舍利石制工具的植物残余分析
J Hum Evol. 2001 Apr;40(4):289-99. doi: 10.1006/jhev.2000.0466.
9
Early Pleistocene presence of Acheulian hominins in South India.印度南部早更新世阿舍利人存在的证据。
Science. 2011 Mar 25;331(6024):1596-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1200183.
10
3.3-million-year-old stone tools from Lomekwi 3, West Turkana, Kenya.来自肯尼亚图尔卡纳湖以西的洛美奎 3 地点的 330 万年前的石器。
Nature. 2015 May 21;521(7552):310-5. doi: 10.1038/nature14464.

引用本文的文献

1
Meaning-making behavior in a small-brained hominin, , from the late Pleistocene: contexts and evolutionary implications.来自晚更新世的一种脑容量较小的古人类的意义构建行为:背景与进化意义。
Elife. 2025 Sep 4;12:RP89125. doi: 10.7554/eLife.89125.
2
Costs of Early Stone Toolmaking cannot Establish the Presence of Know-how Copying.早期石器制作的成本无法确定是否存在技术复制。
Hum Nat. 2025 Jun;36(2):180-218. doi: 10.1007/s12110-025-09494-w. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
3
Flake production: A universal by-product of primate stone percussion.石片产生:灵长类动物石器敲击的一种普遍副产品。

本文引用的文献

1
Early Pleistocene presence of Acheulian hominins in South India.印度南部早更新世阿舍利人存在的证据。
Science. 2011 Mar 25;331(6024):1596-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1200183.
2
The oldest hand-axes in Europe.欧洲最古老的手斧。
Nature. 2009 Sep 3;461(7260):82-5. doi: 10.1038/nature08214.
3
Implications of new early Homo fossils from Ileret, east of Lake Turkana, Kenya.来自肯尼亚图尔卡纳湖以东伊莱雷特的早期人类新化石的意义。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 18;122(7):e2420067122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2420067122. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
4
Exploring early Acheulian technological decision-making: A controlled experimental approach to raw material selection for percussive artifacts in Melka Wakena, Ethiopia.探索阿舍利文化早期的技术决策:以埃塞俄比亚梅尔卡·瓦克纳的打击石器原材料选择为例的控制实验方法
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 9;20(1):e0314039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314039. eCollection 2025.
5
When is a handaxe a planned-axe? exploring morphological variability in the Acheulean.手斧何时成为计划斧?探索阿舍利石器时代的形态变异性。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 16;19(7):e0307081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307081. eCollection 2024.
6
Earliest Prepared core technology in Eurasia from Nihewan (China): Implications for early human abilities and dispersals in East Asia.欧亚大陆最早的尼安德特人核心技术:对东亚早期人类能力和扩散的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 12;121(11):e2313123121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2313123121. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
7
Disruption of trait-environment relationships in African megafauna occurred in the middle Pleistocene.非洲巨型动物的特征-环境关系在中更新世发生了中断。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 18;14(1):4016. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39480-8.
8
From fossils to mind.从化石到心智。
Commun Biol. 2023 Jun 13;6(1):636. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04803-4.
9
Neuroplasticity enables bio-cultural feedback in Paleolithic stone-tool making.神经可塑性使旧石器时代石器制造中的生物文化反馈成为可能。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 18;13(1):2877. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29994-y.
10
Human cooperation and evolutionary transitions in individuality.人类合作与个体性的进化转变。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Mar 13;378(1872):20210414. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0414. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
Nature. 2007 Aug 9;448(7154):688-91. doi: 10.1038/nature05986.
4
Pleistocene milestones on the out-of-Africa corridor at Gesher Benot Ya'aqov, israel.以色列盖舍尔贝诺特亚科夫地区“走出非洲”走廊上的更新世里程碑。
Science. 2000 Aug 11;289(5481):944-7. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5481.944.
5
Earliest Pleistocene hominid cranial remains from Dmanisi, Republic of Georgia: taxonomy, geological setting, and age.格鲁吉亚共和国德马尼西最早更新世人类颅骨化石:分类、地质背景及年代
Science. 2000 May 12;288(5468):1019-25. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5468.1019.
6
Age of the earliest known hominids in Java, Indonesia.印度尼西亚爪哇已知最早原始人类的年代。
Science. 1994 Feb 25;263(5150):1118-21. doi: 10.1126/science.8108729.
7
The earliest Acheulean from Konso-Gardula.来自孔索-加尔杜拉的最早阿舍利文化时期工具。
Nature. 1992;360(6406):732-5. doi: 10.1038/360732a0.