Maljaars Jarymke, Noens Ilse, Jansen Rianne, Scholte Evert, van Berckelaer-Onnes Ina
Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Commun Disord. 2011 Nov-Dec;44(6):601-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
In this study we characterized profiles of communicative functions and forms of children with autism and intellectual disability (n=26), as compared to typically developing children (n=26) with a comparable nonverbal mental age (2-5 years). Videotapes of the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales - Developmental Profile were analyzed using a standardized observation scheme in which three main functions were distinguished: behavior regulation, social interaction, and joint attention. Different forms of communication were also investigated: gestures, vocalizations/verbalizations, and eye gaze. Results indicated that in typically developing children the proportion of communication for the purpose of joint attention was much higher than for behavior regulation, whereas in children with autism the opposite pattern was seen. Low-functioning nonverbal children with autism mainly communicated for behavior regulation and not or only rarely for declarative purposes. Generally, this subgroup used the least complex forms to communicate. Low-functioning verbal children with autism differed from typically developing children only in the rate, not in the proportion of communication for specific functions. Combinations of three different communicative forms were used by verbal children with autism less frequently than by typically developing children.
After reading this paper, readers should be able to: (1) describe early development of communicative functions, (2) explain differences in communication profiles with respect to form and function between verbal and nonverbal low-functioning children with autism and typically developing children matched on nonverbal mental age and (3) discuss clinical implications of the findings for communication interventions in verbal and nonverbal low-functioning children with autism.
在本研究中,我们对患有自闭症和智力障碍的儿童(n = 26)的沟通功能和形式进行了特征描述,并与非语言心理年龄相当(2 - 5岁)的发育正常儿童(n = 26)进行了比较。使用标准化观察方案对《沟通与象征行为量表 - 发展概况》的录像带进行了分析,其中区分了三种主要功能:行为调节、社会互动和共同注意。还研究了不同的沟通形式:手势、发声/言语表达和目光接触。结果表明,在发育正常的儿童中,出于共同注意目的的沟通比例远高于行为调节目的,而在自闭症儿童中则呈现相反的模式。低功能非语言自闭症儿童主要为行为调节进行沟通,而非陈述性目的的沟通则不存在或很少。一般来说,这个亚组使用的沟通形式最不复杂。低功能语言自闭症儿童与发育正常儿童的区别仅在于沟通速率,而非特定功能沟通的比例。与发育正常儿童相比,语言自闭症儿童较少使用三种不同沟通形式的组合。
阅读本文后,读者应能够:(1)描述沟通功能的早期发展,(2)解释在非语言心理年龄匹配的情况下,语言和非语言低功能自闭症儿童与发育正常儿童在沟通形式和功能方面的差异,以及(3)讨论这些发现对语言和非语言低功能自闭症儿童沟通干预的临床意义。