回顾性分析晚期非小细胞肺癌的三线和四线化疗。
Retrospective analysis of third-line and fourth-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
机构信息
Division of Internal Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
出版信息
Clin Lung Cancer. 2012 Jan;13(1):39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
BACKGROUND
The efficacy of third-line and further-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We evaluated the clinical outcome of third- and fourth-line chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced NSCLC in consecutive patients who received first-line chemotherapy at our institute between July 2002 and June 2006. From a hospital-based registry, the following data were extracted: (a) patient characteristics, (b) type of chemotherapeutic agents, and (c) objective response and survival data.
RESULTS
A total of 599 patients were included in this analysis. Overall, 69.3%, 38.4%, 17.7%, and 6.0% of the patients received second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-line chemotherapy, respectively. Significant differences in age (P < .0001), performance status at the start of first-line chemotherapy (P < .0001), and histology (P = .0175) were observed between patients who received third-line chemotherapy and those who did not. Docetaxel, gefitinib, and S-1 were the most frequently used regimens for third- or fourth-line chemotherapy. Five percent of the patients had participated in phase I trials of investigational new drugs. The objective response rates and disease control rates of third- and fourth-line chemotherapy were 17.0% and 34.4% and 11.3% and 24.5%, respectively. The median survival times (95% confidence interval [CI]) from the start of first-, second-, third-, and fourth-line chemotherapy until death were 15.3 months (95% CI, 13.8-16.5 months), 12.8 months (95% CI, 10.7-14.5 months), 12.0 months (95% CI, 9.3-14.2 months), and 9.9 months (95% CI, 8.6-12.0 months), respectively.
CONCLUSION
As many as 38% of patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line chemotherapy could receive third-line chemotherapy. This result emphasizes the need for randomized controlled trials of third-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC.
背景
三线及以上化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效尚不清楚。
患者和方法
我们评估了 2002 年 7 月至 2006 年 6 月期间在我院接受一线化疗的连续患者接受三线和四线化疗的临床疗效。从医院登记处提取以下数据:(a)患者特征,(b)化疗药物类型,和(c)客观反应和生存数据。
结果
共有 599 例患者纳入本分析。总体而言,69.3%、38.4%、17.7%和 6.0%的患者分别接受二线、三线、四线和五线化疗。接受三线化疗的患者与未接受三线化疗的患者在年龄(P<.0001)、一线化疗开始时的体力状态(P<.0001)和组织学(P=.0175)方面存在显著差异。多西他赛、吉非替尼和 S-1 是三线或四线化疗最常用的方案。5%的患者参加了新药物的 I 期临床试验。三线和四线化疗的客观缓解率和疾病控制率分别为 17.0%和 34.4%以及 11.3%和 24.5%。从一线化疗开始至死亡的中位生存时间(95%置信区间[CI])分别为 15.3 个月(95%CI,13.8-16.5 个月)、12.8 个月(95%CI,10.7-14.5 个月)、12.0 个月(95%CI,9.3-14.2 个月)和 9.9 个月(95%CI,8.6-12.0 个月)。
结论
多达 38%的接受一线化疗的晚期 NSCLC 患者可接受三线化疗。这一结果强调了需要对晚期 NSCLC 患者进行三线治疗的随机对照试验。