Kubota K, Sakai H, Katakami N, Nishio M, Inoue A, Okamoto H, Isobe H, Kunitoh H, Takiguchi Y, Kobayashi K, Nakamura Y, Ohmatsu H, Sugawara S, Minato K, Fukuda M, Yokoyama A, Takeuchi M, Michimae H, Gemma A, Kudoh S
Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo.
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Kita-adachi-gun.
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jul;26(7):1401-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv190. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
Platinum-based two-drug combination chemotherapy has been standard of care for patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary aim was to compare overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced NSCLC between the two chemotherapy regimens. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response, safety, and quality of life (QoL).
Patients with previously untreated stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 and adequate organ function were randomized to receive either oral S-1 80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-21 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 8 every 4-5 weeks, or docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 3-4 weeks, both up to six cycles.
A total of 608 patients from 66 sites in Japan were randomized to S-1 plus cisplatin (n = 303) or docetaxel plus cisplatin (n = 305). OS for oral S-1 plus cisplatin was noninferior to docetaxel plus cisplatin [median survival, 16.1 versus 17.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 1.013; 96.4% confidence interval (CI) 0.837-1.227]. Significantly higher febrile neutropenia (7.4% versus 1.0%), grade 3/4 neutropenia (73.4% versus 22.9%), grade 3/4 infection (14.5% versus 5.3%), and grade 1/2 alopecia (59.3% versus 12.3%) were observed in the docetaxel plus cisplatin than in the S-1 plus cisplatin. There were no differences found in PFS or response between the two arms. QoL data investigated by EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC-13 favored the S-1 plus cisplatin.
Oral S-1 plus cisplatin is not inferior to docetaxel plus cisplatin and is better tolerated in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC.
UMIN000000608.
基于铂类的两药联合化疗一直是晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的标准治疗方案。主要目的是比较两种化疗方案治疗晚期NSCLC患者的总生存期(OS)。次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、缓解率、安全性和生活质量(QoL)。
既往未接受过治疗的ⅢB期或Ⅳ期NSCLC患者,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为0 - 1且器官功能良好,随机分为两组,一组每4 - 5周在第1 - 21天口服S - 1 80 mg/m²/天,第8天静脉滴注顺铂60 mg/m²;另一组每3 - 4周在第1天静脉滴注多西他赛60 mg/m²,第1天静脉滴注顺铂80 mg/m²。两组均进行最多6个周期的治疗。
来自日本66个研究点的608例患者被随机分为S - 1联合顺铂组(n = 303)和多西他赛联合顺铂组(n = 305)。口服S - 1联合顺铂组的OS不劣于多西他赛联合顺铂组[中位生存期分别为16.1个月和17.1个月;风险比 = 1.013;96.4%置信区间(CI)0.837 - 1.227]。多西他赛联合顺铂组的发热性中性粒细胞减少症(7.4%对1.0%)、3/4级中性粒细胞减少症(73.4%对22.9%)、3/4级感染(14.5%对5.3%)和1/2级脱发(59.3%对12.3%)的发生率均显著高于S - 1联合顺铂组。两组在PFS或缓解率方面未发现差异。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ - C30和LC - 13量表调查的生活质量数据显示S - 1联合顺铂组更优。
口服S - 1联合顺铂并不劣于多西他赛联合顺铂,且在日本晚期NSCLC患者中耐受性更好。
UMIN000000608。