Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Exp Physiol. 2011 Nov;96(11):1179-95. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2011.059881. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
The end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (ESPVR) is proposed and used as a reliable index of left ventricular (LV) contractility despite the fact that its afterload independence has been challenged. Furthermore, the physiological relevance of its volume-axis intercept, V(0), remains unclear. Systemic haemodynamics and pressure-volume loops obtained by inferior vena cava occlusion were recorded in 21 rats anaesthetized by isoflurane inhalation and instrumented with a conductance pressure-volume catheter in response to incremental I.V. doses of adrenaline, dobutamine, phenylephrine, metoprolol, papaverine and isoflurane inhalation. In conditions with large variations (± 100%) of both inotropy and afterload, infusion of negative inotropic drugs was associated with a dose-dependent rightward shift of ESPVR accompanied by a decrease in its slope (end-systolic elastance, E(es)), whereas positive inotropic agents produced an isolated decrease in V(0). With the predominant vasoactive drugs, there was a dose-dependent change in E(es) without major horizontal shifts, demonstrating that this slope mainly represents LV afterload rather than inotropy. When contractility was altered, V(0) was negatively correlated to the preload-adjusted contractility index, PAdP/dt(max), demonstrating that a reduced V(0) provides a good reflection of increased LV contractility. From these results, we computed a logarithmically adjusted E(es)/V(0) ratio, which resulted in reasonably strong concordance with PAdP/dt(max), including all the investigated drugs and dosages [n = 288; bias, 0.8 ± 16.2% (SD)]. Concordance with E(es) (bias, 7.2 ± 58.7%) or V(0) (bias, -0.6 ± 33.4%), used alone or with other commonly used contractility indices, was far less significant. In contrast to E(es), V(0) provides a relatively good LV contractility index because it is much less sensitive to afterload.
尽管终末收缩压力-容积关系(ESPVR)的后负荷独立性受到了挑战,但它仍被提议并用作左心室(LV)收缩力的可靠指标。此外,其容积轴截距 V(0) 的生理相关性尚不清楚。在 21 只接受异氟醚吸入麻醉并通过心导管测量下腔静脉闭塞获得的全身血液动力学和压力-容积环的大鼠中,记录了递增静脉内给予肾上腺素、多巴酚丁胺、苯肾上腺素、美托洛尔、罂粟碱和异氟醚吸入的反应。在变异性较大(±100%)的变力和后负荷条件下,输注负性肌力药物与 ESPVR 的剂量依赖性右移相关,伴有斜率(收缩末期弹性,E(es))降低,而正性肌力药物则导致 V(0) 孤立性降低。在主要的血管活性药物中,E(es) 随剂量变化而变化,没有明显的水平移位,表明该斜率主要代表 LV 后负荷而不是变力。当收缩力改变时,V(0) 与前负荷调整的收缩力指数 PAdP/dt(max) 呈负相关,表明 V(0) 降低很好地反映了 LV 收缩力的增加。从这些结果中,我们计算了对数调整的 E(es)/V(0) 比值,该比值与 PAdP/dt(max) 具有很好的一致性,包括所有研究的药物和剂量[n = 288;偏差,0.8 ± 16.2%(SD)]。与 E(es)(偏差,7.2 ± 58.7%)或 V(0)(偏差,-0.6 ± 33.4%)的一致性,单独使用或与其他常用的收缩力指数一起使用,要差得多。与 E(es) 相比,V(0) 提供了一个相对较好的 LV 收缩力指数,因为它对后负荷的敏感性要低得多。