• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续性肾脏替代治疗强度对脓毒症合并急性肾损伤患者的影响:一项单中心随机临床试验。

Effect of the intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with sepsis and acute kidney injury: a single-center randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Kidney Disease Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Mar;27(3):967-73. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr486. Epub 2011 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfr486
PMID:21891773
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major complication in patients with sepsis and is an independent predictor of mortality. However, the optimal intensity of renal replacement therapy for such patients is still controversial.

METHODS

From 1 January 2004 to 30 September 2009, we randomly assigned 280 patients with sepsis and AKI to continuous renal replacement therapy by high-volume hemofiltration (50 mL/kg/h, HVHF) or extra high-volume hemofiltration (85 mL/kg/h, EHVHF). The primary study outcome was death from any cause within 28, 60 and 90 days. Results were analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods and by Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients were given EHVHF and 139 were given HVHF. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics and received treatment for an average of 9.38 days (EHVHF group) and 8.88 days (HVHF group). There were no significant differences between the groups in number of deaths at 28, 60 or 90 days. There were also no differences between the groups in renal outcome of survivors at 90 days. Multivariate analysis indicated that inotropic support by norepinephrine, time in hospital of >7 days, blood platelet count <8 × 10(9)/L, Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score >25, total bilirubin >100 μmol/L, prothrombin time >18 s, serum creatinine <250 μmol/L and blood urea nitrogen >20 mmol/L were independent risk factors for death at 90 days after initiation of renal replacement therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with sepsis and AKI, increasing the intensity of renal replacement therapy from 50 (HVHF) to 85 mL/kg/h (EHVHF) had no effect on survival at 28 and 90 days.

摘要

简介

急性肾损伤(AKI)是脓毒症患者的主要并发症,也是死亡率的独立预测因子。然而,此类患者的最佳肾脏替代治疗强度仍存在争议。

方法

2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 9 月 30 日,我们将 280 名脓毒症合并 AKI 患者随机分为高容量血液滤过(50ml/kg/h,HVHF)或超高容量血液滤过(85ml/kg/h,EHVHF)组进行连续肾脏替代治疗。主要研究终点为 28、60 和 90 天的任何原因死亡。采用单因素和多因素方法以及 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线进行分析。

结果

共 141 例患者接受 EHVHF,139 例患者接受 HVHF。两组患者的基线特征相似,平均接受治疗 9.38 天(EHVHF 组)和 8.88 天(HVHF 组)。28、60 和 90 天时,两组的死亡率无显著差异。90 天存活者的肾脏结局也无差异。多因素分析表明,去甲肾上腺素的正性肌力支持、住院时间>7 天、血小板计数<8×10(9)/L、急性生理和慢性健康评分(APACHE)Ⅱ评分>25、总胆红素>100μmol/L、凝血酶原时间>18s、血清肌酐<250μmol/L、血尿素氮>20mmol/L 是肾脏替代治疗开始后 90 天死亡的独立危险因素。

结论

在脓毒症合并 AKI 患者中,将肾脏替代治疗强度从 50(HVHF)增加到 85ml/kg/h(EHVHF)对 28 和 90 天的生存率没有影响。

相似文献

1
Effect of the intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with sepsis and acute kidney injury: a single-center randomized clinical trial.连续性肾脏替代治疗强度对脓毒症合并急性肾损伤患者的影响:一项单中心随机临床试验。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Mar;27(3):967-73. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr486. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
2
[Risk factors for mortality in intensive care unit patients with sepsis combined with acute kidney injury after continuous renal replacement therapy: secondary analysis of the data from a multicenter observational study].[连续性肾脏替代治疗后脓毒症合并急性肾损伤的重症监护病房患者的死亡危险因素:一项多中心观察性研究数据的二次分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Feb;31(2):155-159. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.02.007.
3
High-volume hemofiltration in adult burn patients with septic shock and acute kidney injury: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.大容量血液滤过在伴有脓毒性休克和急性肾损伤的成年烧伤患者中的应用:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Crit Care. 2017 Nov 25;21(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1878-8.
4
[A clinical study on organ protective effect of early high-volume hemofiltration (HVHF) in patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) complicated by acute kidney injury (AKI)].早期高容量血液滤过(HVHF)对多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)合并急性肾损伤(AKI)患者器官保护作用的临床研究
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2011 Oct;23(10):605-7.
5
Impact of Early Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy in Patients With Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: An Analysis of the MIMIC-IV Database.早期连续肾脏替代疗法对脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤患者的影响:对 MIMIC-IV 数据库的分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Nov 11;39(43):e276. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e276.
6
[A multicenter clinical study of critically ill patients with sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury in Beijing: incidence, clinical characteristics and outcomes].北京地区脓毒症合并急性肾损伤危重症患者的多中心临床研究:发病率、临床特征及预后
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Jun;36(6):567-573. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240210-00124.
7
Clinical characteristics of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.连续性肾脏替代治疗患者脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤的临床特征。
Ren Fail. 2018 Nov;40(1):403-409. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2018.1489288.
8
[An analysis of clinical characteristics of septic acute kidney injury by using criteria of Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes].[应用《改善全球肾脏病预后组织》标准分析脓毒症急性肾损伤的临床特征]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Apr;52(4):299-304.
9
Adding a dialysis dose to continuous hemofiltration increases survival in patients with acute renal failure.在连续性血液滤过基础上增加透析剂量可提高急性肾衰竭患者的生存率。
Kidney Int. 2006 Oct;70(7):1312-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001705. Epub 2006 Jul 19.
10
[Comparison of clinical efficacy between continuous renal replacement therapy and intermittent haemodialysis for the treatment of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury].连续性肾脏替代治疗与间歇性血液透析治疗脓毒症诱发的急性肾损伤的临床疗效比较
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2016 Mar;28(3):277-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Adjunctive immunotherapeutic agents in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a multidisciplinary consensus of 23.脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的辅助免疫治疗药物:23位专家的多学科共识
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2024 Apr 30;4(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s44158-024-00165-3.
2
Septic Hyperinflammation-Is There a Role for Extracorporeal Blood Purification Techniques?脓毒症性过度炎症反应——体外血液净化技术是否有作用?
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Mar 8;25(6):3120. doi: 10.3390/ijms25063120.
3
Elevated mean arterial pressure is associated with a lower risk of mortality in acute kidney injury patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy.
平均动脉压升高与接受连续性肾脏替代治疗的急性肾损伤患者的死亡率降低相关。
Ren Fail. 2023 Dec;45(1):2238828. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2238828.
4
Hypobaric Hypoxia Aggravates Renal Injury by Inducing the Formation of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps through the NF-κB Signaling Pathway.低压缺氧通过NF-κB信号通路诱导中性粒细胞胞外诱捕网形成加重肾损伤
Curr Med Sci. 2023 Jun;43(3):469-477. doi: 10.1007/s11596-023-2744-3. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
5
Rosiglitazone attenuates hypoxia-induced renal cell apoptosis by inhibiting NF-κB signaling pathway in a PPARγ-dependent manner.罗格列酮通过依赖 PPARγ 的方式抑制 NF-κB 信号通路来减轻低氧诱导的肾小管细胞凋亡。
Ren Fail. 2022 Dec;44(1):2056-2065. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2148539.
6
Sepsis-induced AKI: From pathogenesis to therapeutic approaches.脓毒症诱导的急性肾损伤:从发病机制到治疗方法
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 15;13:981578. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.981578. eCollection 2022.
7
Sepsis-Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Concepts.脓毒症——病理生理学与治疗理念
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 14;8:628302. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.628302. eCollection 2021.
8
Dose of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: A Bona Fide Quality Indicator.危重症患者连续性肾脏替代治疗剂量:一个名副其实的质量指标。
Nephron. 2021;145(2):91-98. doi: 10.1159/000512846. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
The therapeutic effect of high-volume hemofiltration on sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高容量血液滤过对脓毒症的治疗效果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Apr;8(7):488. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.48.
10
The role of activated NLRP3 inflammatory body in acute kidney injury in rats caused by sepsis and NLRP3-TXNIP signaling pathway.活化的NLRP3炎性小体在脓毒症所致大鼠急性肾损伤中的作用及NLRP3-TXNIP信号通路
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020 May;27(5):1251-1259. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.03.018. Epub 2020 Mar 18.