• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

入院后首24小时的血糖水平并非危重症患者死亡的危险因素。

[Blood glucose levels in the first 24 hours of admission is not a risk factor for mortality in critical care patients].

作者信息

Blesa Malpica A L, Cubells Romeral M, Morales Sorribas E, Tejero Redondo A, Martínez Sagasti F, Martín Benítez J C, Garitacelaya Gorrochategui M, Ortuño Anderiz F

机构信息

Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España.

出版信息

Nutr Hosp. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):622-35. doi: 10.1590/S0212-16112011000300028.

DOI:10.1590/S0212-16112011000300028
PMID:21892584
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Glycemic alterations are known as a risk condition of death in several diseases, such as ischemic cardiovascular and neurological disorders. The fact that its tight control under narrow normality levels decreases mortality and morbidity have led to further studies seeking to confirm the results and expand them to other disease areas.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether glycemic changes by themselves are a mortality risk factor in a sample of patients within an Intensive Care Unit (ICU), among which predominates traumatic-surgical patients.

METHODS

Demographic and analytical characteristics were revised, as well as common monitoring variables in an ICU, among a sample of 2,554 patients from admissions between 1st January 2004 and 31 December 2008. Data were obtained from a database which endorsed records compiled with the monitoring ICU patients program "Carevue". They were processed with dynamics sheets included in the Excel software with the following variables: initial glycemia, mean glycemia during the first 24 hours and number of determinations performed. We used the mean value in the admission day of the remaining analytical and monitoring variables and the number of test performed on this first day. The sample was stratified in two groups for the statistical analysis: a) General Sample (MG) and b) sample excluding patients admitted after a programmed surgery (EQP). In both cases the effect of initial and averaged glycemia was checked. Group b was divided in two, according to the number of determinations b1) a single blood glucose determination group (EQP1) and b2) a multiple determination group (EQPM). From this group of non-programmed surgical patients the study was repeated in those patients who stayed at the ICU 3 or more days (EQP3D). Chi-square and Mantel-Haenzel test for the ODD ratio determination were performed for qualitative variables; quantitative variables were examined with the Mann-Whitney test. At each analysis level, logistic regression was performed using mortality as the dependent variable, including those variables with p-values < 0.05 which represented more than 60% of the data. An initially saturated model with backward till the final equation was used. A p-value of 0.05 (i.e. p < 0.05) was set as the significant threshold for all statistical analysis. They were performed with SPSS and GSTAT 2 statistical software.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 2,165 of the 2,554 admitted patients during the study period were included (96.5%). Exclusion criteria were absence of plasma glucose determinations. In the bivariate analysis, first and mean glucose blood levels showed significant differences in mortality rates in absolute figures and also when data were classified stratified in three levels (< 60 mg/dl; 60-110 mg/dl or > 110 mg/dl) or in two (normal values 60 to 110 mg/dl and unusual figures < 60 mg/dl or > 110 mg/dl). These significant differences were lost when a logistic model was applied. From the remaining variables, renal function and NEMS showed to be mortality risks factors in this sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperglycemia is a predominant phenomenon in critically ill patients. Hypoglycemia is less frequent and is associated with higher mortality rates. Initial glucose blood level, by itself, was not a mortality risk factor in the multivariate study and at none of the studied levels. Average glycemia did not add any prediction power. The changes in glucose blood levels seemed to be an adaptation process, which determined by itself a risk for the patient's discharge, at least in the first 24 hours period after ICU admission.

摘要

引言

血糖改变在多种疾病中被认为是死亡的风险因素,如缺血性心血管疾病和神经系统疾病。在狭窄的正常水平下严格控制血糖可降低死亡率和发病率,这一事实促使进一步研究以证实结果并将其扩展到其他疾病领域。

目的

确定在重症监护病房(ICU)的患者样本中,血糖变化本身是否为死亡风险因素,其中创伤手术患者占主导。

方法

回顾了2004年1月1日至2008年12月31日期间收治的2554例患者样本的人口统计学和分析特征,以及ICU中的常见监测变量。数据来自一个数据库,该数据库认可了通过“Carevue”ICU患者监测程序汇编的记录。使用Excel软件中的动态工作表对以下变量进行处理:初始血糖、最初24小时内的平均血糖以及进行的测定次数。我们使用入院当天其余分析和监测变量的平均值以及第一天进行的检测次数。为进行统计分析,样本分为两组:a)一般样本(MG)和b)排除计划性手术后入院患者的样本(EQP)。在这两种情况下,均检查了初始血糖和平均血糖的影响。根据测定次数,b组又分为两组:b1)单次血糖测定组(EQP1)和b2)多次测定组(EQPM)。在这些非计划性手术患者中,对在ICU停留3天或更长时间的患者(EQP3D)重复进行该研究。对定性变量进行卡方检验和用于确定比值比的Mantel-Haenzel检验;对定量变量进行Mann-Whitney检验。在每个分析层面,以死亡率作为因变量进行逻辑回归,纳入p值<0.05且占数据60%以上的变量。使用最初的饱和模型并向后推导直至最终方程。将p值0.05(即p<0.05)设定为所有统计分析的显著阈值。使用SPSS和GSTAT 2统计软件进行分析。

结果与讨论

在研究期间收治的2554例患者中,共有2165例被纳入(96.5%)。排除标准为未进行血浆葡萄糖测定。在双变量分析中,首次和平均血糖水平在绝对死亡率方面以及在按三个水平(<60mg/dl;60 - 110mg/dl或>110mg/dl)或两个水平(正常范围60至110mg/dl以及异常值<60mg/dl或>110mg/dl)分层分类数据时,死亡率存在显著差异。应用逻辑模型后,这些显著差异消失。在其余变量中,肾功能和NEMS在该样本中显示为死亡风险因素。

结论

高血糖在危重症患者中是主要现象。低血糖较少见且与较高死亡率相关。在多变量研究中,初始血糖水平本身在任何研究层面均不是死亡风险因素。平均血糖并未增加任何预测能力。血糖水平的变化似乎是一个适应过程,其本身决定了患者出院的风险,至少在ICU入院后的最初24小时内如此。

相似文献

1
[Blood glucose levels in the first 24 hours of admission is not a risk factor for mortality in critical care patients].入院后首24小时的血糖水平并非危重症患者死亡的危险因素。
Nutr Hosp. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):622-35. doi: 10.1590/S0212-16112011000300028.
2
[Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].[意大利关于空气污染短期影响研究的荟萃分析]
Epidemiol Prev. 2001 Mar-Apr;25(2 Suppl):1-71.
3
Mean glucose values predict trauma patient mortality.平均血糖值可预测创伤患者的死亡率。
J Trauma. 2008 Jul;65(1):42-7; discussion 47-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318176c54e.
4
Hyperglycemia in acute aluminum phosphide poisoning as a potential prognostic factor.急性磷化铝中毒中的高血糖作为一种潜在的预后因素。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2008 Jul;27(7):591-5. doi: 10.1177/0960327108096382.
5
[The association between early blood glucose fluctuation and prognosis in critically ill patients].[危重症患者早期血糖波动与预后的关系]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2012 Jan;24(1):50-3.
6
Dynamic tight glycemic control during and after cardiac surgery is effective, feasible, and safe.心脏手术期间及术后进行动态严格血糖控制是有效、可行且安全的。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jul;107(1):51-8. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318172c557.
7
The association of mean glucose level and glucose variability with intensive care unit mortality in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.严重急性胰腺炎患者的平均血糖水平和血糖变异性与重症监护病房死亡率的关系。
J Crit Care. 2012 Apr;27(2):146-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.12.004.
8
Early blood glucose control and mortality in critically ill patients in Australia.澳大利亚危重症患者的早期血糖控制与死亡率
Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):463-70. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318194b097.
9
Hyperglycemia is associated with poor outcomes in surgical critically ill patients receiving parenteral nutrition.接受肠外营养的外科重症患者出现高血糖与不良预后相关。
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2013 Jun;51(2):67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
10
Iatrogenic hypoglycemia secondary to tight glucose control is an independent determinant for mortality and cardiac morbidity.由于严格的血糖控制导致的医源性低血糖是死亡率和心脏发病率的独立决定因素。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Aug;40(2):360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.065. Epub 2011 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Value of Serum Glucose Level in Critically Ill Septic Patients on Admission to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.小儿重症监护病房收治的危重症脓毒症患儿入院时血清葡萄糖水平的预后价值
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023 Oct;27(10):754-758. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24546.
2
Glycemia upon admission and mortality in a pediatric intensive care unit.儿科重症监护病房入院时的血糖水平与死亡率
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018 Oct-Dec;30(4):471-478. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20180068.