Suppr超能文献

[危重症患者早期血糖波动与预后的关系]

[The association between early blood glucose fluctuation and prognosis in critically ill patients].

作者信息

Tang Jian, Gu Qin

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2012 Jan;24(1):50-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between early blood glucose level fluctuation and prognosis of critically ill patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study involving 95 critically ill patients in intensive care unit (ICU) was conducted. According to the 28-day outcome after admission to ICU, the patients were divided into nonsurvivors (43 cases) and survivors (52 cases), and the blood glucose level in them was monitored in the first 72 hours. Blood glucose concentration at admission (BGadm), mean blood glucose level (MBG), hyperglycemia index (HGI), glycemic lability index (GLI), incidence of hypoglycemia and total dosage of intravenous insulin for each patient were compared. The index as an independent risk factor of mortality was determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis and the predictor value by comparing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve, AUC) of each index.

RESULTS

The BGadm (mmol/L), MBG (mmol/L), HGI and the incidence of hypoglycemia showed no significant differences between nonsurvivors and survivors [BGadm: 9.87 ± 4.48 vs. 9.26 ± 3.07, MBG: 8.59 ± 1.23 vs. 8.47 ± 1.01, HGI(6.0): 2.45 ± 0.94 vs. 1.68 ± 1.05, HGI(8.3): 0.84 ± 0.70 vs. 0.68 ± 0.51, the incidence of hypoglycemia: 9.30% vs. 5.77%, all P > 0.05], but acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II ) score, GLI and the total dosage of intravenous insulin (U) were significantly higher in nonsurvivors than survivors [APACHE II score: 23 ± 6 vs. 19 ± 6, GLI: 56.96 (65.43) vs. 23.87 (41.62), the total dosage of intravenous insulin: 65.5 (130.5) vs. 12.5 (90.0), all P < 0.05]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that APACHE II score and GLI were both independent risk factors [APACHE II score: odds ratio (OR) = 1.09, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.01-1.17; GLI: OR = 1.03, 95%CI 1.01-1.06, both P < 0.05]. When ROC curve was plotted, the AUC of APACHE II score and GLI was respectively 0.69 and 0.71, and there was no significant difference (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Early fluctuation of blood glucose is a significant independent risk factor of mortality in critically ill patients. Control the early fluctuation of blood glucose concentration might improve the patients' outcome.

摘要

目的

探讨危重症患者早期血糖水平波动与预后的关系。

方法

对95例入住重症监护病房(ICU)的危重症患者进行回顾性研究。根据入住ICU后28天的结局,将患者分为非存活者(43例)和存活者(52例),并监测其入住后72小时内的血糖水平。比较每位患者的入院血糖浓度(BGadm)、平均血糖水平(MBG)、高血糖指数(HGI)、血糖波动指数(GLI)、低血糖发生率及静脉胰岛素总用量。通过多因素logistic回归分析确定各指标作为死亡独立危险因素的情况,并通过比较各指标的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线,AUC)下面积来评估其预测价值。

结果

非存活者与存活者的BGadm(mmol/L)、MBG(mmol/L)、HGI及低血糖发生率差异无统计学意义[BGadm:9.87±4.48 vs. 9.26±3.07,MBG:8.59±1.23 vs. 8.47±1.01,HGI(6.0):2.45±0.94 vs. 1.68±1.05,HGI(8.3):0.84±0.70 vs. 0.68±0.51,低血糖发生率:9.30% vs. 5.77%,均P>0.05],但非存活者的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II(APACHE II)、GLI及静脉胰岛素总用量(U)显著高于存活者[APACHE II评分:23±6 vs. 19±6,GLI:56.96(65.43) vs. 23.87(41.62),静脉胰岛素总用量:65.5(130.5) vs. 12.5(90.0),均P<0.05]。多因素logistic回归分析显示,APACHE II评分和GLI均为独立危险因素[APACHE II评分:比值比(OR)=1.09,95%置信区间(95%CI)1.01 - 1.17;GLI:OR = 1.03,95%CI 1.01 - 1.06,均P<0.05]。绘制ROC曲线时,APACHE II评分和GLI的AUC分别为0.69和0.71,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

早期血糖波动是危重症患者死亡的重要独立危险因素。控制早期血糖浓度波动可能改善患者预后。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验