• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

已知会影响临床决策支持系统接受度的因素。

Factors known to influence acceptance of clinical decision support systems.

作者信息

Kilsdonk E, Peute L W P, Knijnenburg S L, Jaspers M W M

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:150-4.

PMID:21893732
Abstract

Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) have been shown to improve clinical performance and patient outcomes, but the failure rate of such systems is still over 50 percent. To contribute to a wider understanding of issues surrounding CDDS acceptance, we performed a systematic review of studies that evaluated CDSS implementations in clinical care to determine the factors that are associated with acceptance of CDSS by physicians. The factors that were found were categorized according to the HOT-fit framework. The mapping of factors concerning CDSS acceptance on the HOT-fit framework revealed gaps in each domain of the framework and showed that research has mainly focused on human and technology factors and a lack of research on organizational factors. A potential area of research could thus be studying the organizational factors that may influence CDSS acceptance.

摘要

临床决策支持系统(CDSS)已被证明可改善临床绩效和患者预后,但此类系统的失败率仍超过50%。为了促进对围绕CDDS接受度问题的更广泛理解,我们对评估CDSS在临床护理中实施情况的研究进行了系统综述,以确定与医生接受CDSS相关的因素。所发现的因素根据HOT-fit框架进行了分类。将与CDSS接受度相关的因素映射到HOT-fit框架上,揭示了该框架各领域存在的差距,并表明研究主要集中在人与技术因素上,而对组织因素的研究不足。因此,一个潜在的研究领域可能是研究可能影响CDSS接受度的组织因素。

相似文献

1
Factors known to influence acceptance of clinical decision support systems.已知会影响临床决策支持系统接受度的因素。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:150-4.
2
Clinical decision support systems in the pediatric intensive care unit.儿科重症监护病房中的临床决策支持系统。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan;10(1):23-8. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181936b23.
3
Understanding technology adoption in clinical care: clinician adoption behavior of a point-of-care reminder system.理解临床护理中的技术应用:即时护理提醒系统的临床医生采用行为。
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Aug;74(7-8):535-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.03.007. Epub 2005 Apr 21.
4
Adoption of clinical decision support systems in a developing country: Antecedents and outcomes of physician's threat to perceived professional autonomy.发展中国家临床决策支持系统的采用:医生对感知到的职业自主性受到威胁的前因及后果
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Aug;84(8):548-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
5
The safety and quality of decision support systems.决策支持系统的安全性与质量。
Yearb Med Inform. 2006:20-5.
6
Clinical decision support implementations.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;151:296-311.
7
Clinical decision support systems use in Wisconsin.威斯康星州临床决策支持系统的使用情况。
WMJ. 2007 May;106(3):126-9.
8
What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): a focus group study with physicians.哪些因素可能有助于或阻碍计算机化决策支持系统(CDSSs)的实施:一项针对医生的焦点小组研究
Fam Pract. 2008 Jun;25(3):162-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn020. Epub 2008 May 25.
9
Practitioner approaches to the integration of clinical decision support system technology in critical care.从业者在重症监护中整合临床决策支持系统技术的方法。
J Nurs Adm. 2009 Nov;39(11):465-9. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181bd5fc2.
10
Factors influencing implementation success of guideline-based clinical decision support systems: A systematic review and gaps analysis.影响基于指南的临床决策支持系统实施成功的因素:系统评价与差距分析
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Feb;98:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Value of Clinical Decision Support in Healthcare: A Focus on Screening and Early Detection.临床决策支持在医疗保健中的价值:聚焦筛查与早期检测
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 6;15(5):648. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15050648.
2
The Knowledge, Perception and Utilisation of E-Health among Health Workers in Benin City, Nigeria.尼日利亚贝宁城卫生工作者对电子健康的认知、理解与应用
Niger Med J. 2022 Sep 12;63(3):226-235. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.
3
Provider perspectives on a point-of-care tool to facilitate patient-centered contraceptive care among Latina/x patients in Baltimore, MD.
医疗服务提供者对一种即时护理工具的看法,该工具旨在促进马里兰州巴尔的摩市拉丁裔/拉丁裔患者以患者为中心的避孕护理。
PEC Innov. 2023 Jul 8;3:100190. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100190. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
4
The Reasons for Physicians and Pharmacists' Acceptance of Clinical Support Systems in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯的医生和药剂师接受临床支持系统的原因。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;20(4):3132. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043132.
5
Clinical decision support systems-based interventions to improve medication outcomes: A systematic literature review on features and effects.基于临床决策支持系统的干预措施以改善用药效果:关于特征与效果的系统文献综述
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021 Feb 22;35:27. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.27. eCollection 2021.
6
Integrating a Web-Based Self-Management Tool (Managing Joint Pain on the Web and Through Resources) for People With Osteoarthritis-Related Joint Pain With a Web-Based Social Network Support Tool (Generating Engagement in Network Involvement): Design, Development, and Early Evaluation.将基于网络的自我管理工具(通过网络和资源管理关节疼痛)与基于网络的社交网络支持工具(促进网络参与度)整合,用于骨关节炎相关关节疼痛患者:设计、开发与早期评估。
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Nov 26;4(11):e18565. doi: 10.2196/18565.
7
Clinical Decision Support for Worker Health: A Five-Site Qualitative Needs Assessment in Primary Care Settings.针对劳动者健康的临床决策支持:在基层医疗环境中的五地点定性需求评估
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Aug;11(4):635-643. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715895. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
8
A qualitative framework-based evaluation of radiology clinical decision support initiatives: eliciting key factors to physician adoption in implementation.基于定性框架的放射学临床决策支持计划评估:确定医生在实施过程中采用的关键因素。
JAMIA Open. 2019 Feb 22;2(1):187-196. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz002. eCollection 2019 Apr.
9
Evaluating the Feasibility of a Software Prototype Supporting the Management of Multimorbid Seniors: Mixed Methods Study in General Practices.评估支持多病共存老年人管理的软件原型的可行性:全科医疗中的混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 Jul 4;6(3):e12695. doi: 10.2196/12695.
10
"A Tool, Not a Crutch": Patient Perspectives About IBM Watson for Oncology Trained by Memorial Sloan Kettering.“一种工具,而非拐杖”:纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心培训的 IBM Watson for Oncology 的患者观点。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Apr;15(4):e277-e288. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00417. Epub 2019 Jan 28.