• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于美国和欧洲电子健康记录认证现状的政策简报。

Policy brief on the current status of certification of electronic Health Records in the US and Europe.

作者信息

De Moor Georges, O'Brien John, Fridsma Doug, Bean Carol, Devlies Jos, Cusack Caitlin M, Bloomrosen Meryl, Lorenzi Nancy, Coorevits Pascal

机构信息

The EuroRec Institute, Belgium.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;170:83-106.

PMID:21893900
Abstract

If Electronic Health Record systems are to provide an effective contribution to healthcare, a set of benchmarks need to be set to ensure quality control and interoperability of systems. This paper outlines the prevailing status of EHR certification in the US and the EU, compares and contrasts established schemes and poses opportunities for convergence of activity in the domain designed to advance certification endeavours generally. Several EU Member States have in the past proceeded with EHR systems quality labeling and/or certification, but these differ in scope, in legal framework under which they operate, in policies (legislation and financial incentives), in organization, and perhaps most importantly in the quality criteria used for benchmarking. Harmonization, therefore, became a must. Now, through EuroRec (with approaches ranging from self-assessment to third party certification depending on the level of confidence needed) and its Seals, the possibility to achieve this for EHR systems has started in the whole of Europe. The US HITECH Act also attempts to create incentives for all hospitals and eligible providers to adopt and use electronic information. A centerpiece of the Act is to put in place strong financial incentives to adopt and meaningfully use EHRs. The HHS/EHR Certification Programme makes use of ISO/IEC 170XX standards for accreditation, testing and certification. The approved test method addresses the functional and the interoperability requirements defined in the Final Rule criteria and standards. To date six Authorized Testing and Certification Bodies (ATCBs) are testing and certifying products in the US.

摘要

如果电子健康记录系统要对医疗保健做出有效贡献,就需要设定一套基准,以确保系统的质量控制和互操作性。本文概述了美国和欧盟电子健康记录认证的现状,比较并对比了既定方案,并为该领域旨在推动认证工作的活动融合提供了机会。过去,一些欧盟成员国已着手进行电子健康记录系统的质量标签和/或认证,但这些在范围、运作的法律框架、政策(立法和财政激励措施)、组织方面存在差异,也许最重要的是在用于基准测试的质量标准方面存在差异。因此,协调统一成为必要。现在,通过欧洲电子健康记录认证机构(EuroRec,根据所需的置信水平,采用从自我评估到第三方认证等多种方法)及其认证标志,在整个欧洲已开始有实现电子健康记录系统协调统一的可能性。美国的《健康信息技术经济和临床健康法案》(HITECH Act)也试图为所有医院和符合条件的医疗服务提供者采用和使用电子信息创造激励措施。该法案的核心是提供强有力的财政激励措施,以促使采用并切实使用电子健康记录。美国卫生与公众服务部/电子健康记录认证计划利用ISO/IEC 170XX标准进行认可、测试和认证。经批准的测试方法涉及最终规则标准中定义的功能和互操作性要求。迄今为止,在美国有六个授权测试和认证机构(ATCBs)正在对产品进行测试和认证。

相似文献

1
Policy brief on the current status of certification of electronic Health Records in the US and Europe.关于美国和欧洲电子健康记录认证现状的政策简报。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;170:83-106.
2
A proposed vision: the transatlantic observatory for meeting global health policy challenges through information and communications technology-enabled solutions (ARGOS).一个提议的愿景:通过基于信息通信技术的解决方案应对全球卫生政策挑战的跨大西洋观测站(ARGOS)。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;170:107-11.
3
Policy needs and options for a common transatlantic approach towards measuring adoption, usage and benefits of eHealth.针对跨大西洋地区在衡量电子健康的采用情况、使用情况和效益方面采取共同方法的政策需求与选项。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;170:17-48.
4
Certification of Electronic Health Record systems and the importance of the validation of clinical archetypes.电子健康记录系统的认证以及临床原型验证的重要性。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;141:82-91.
5
Health information technology: initial set of standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology. Final rule.健康信息技术:电子健康记录技术的初始标准集、实施规范和认证标准。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2010 Jul 28;75(144):44589-654.
6
Establishment of the temporary certification program for health information technology. Final rule.健康信息技术临时认证计划的制定。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2010 Jun 24;75(121):36157-209.
7
Risk assessment of integrated electronic health records.整合电子健康记录的风险评估
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;155:78-84.
8
Policy needs and options for a common approach towards modelling and simulation of human physiology and diseases with a focus on the virtual physiological human.以虚拟生理人体为重点的人类生理学和疾病建模与模拟通用方法的政策需求与选项。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;170:49-82.
9
Establishment of the permanent certification program for health information technology. Final rule.健康信息技术永久认证计划的制定。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2011 Jan 7;76(5):1261-331.
10
Health information technology: initial set of standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology. Interim final rule.健康信息技术:电子健康记录技术的初始标准集、实施规范和认证标准。暂行最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2010 Jan 13;75(8):2013-47.

引用本文的文献

1
Systems strategies to support cancer screening in U.S. primary care practice.支持美国初级保健实践中癌症筛查的系统策略。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Dec;20(12):2471-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0783. Epub 2011 Oct 5.