Suppr超能文献

卡培他滨对比 5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙作为 III 期结肠癌的辅助治疗:X-ACT 试验的最终结果,按年龄分析及疗效的药效动力学标志物的初步证据。

Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer: final results from the X-ACT trial with analysis by age and preliminary evidence of a pharmacodynamic marker of efficacy.

机构信息

University of Leeds and St James's Institute of Oncology Hospital, Leeds Cancer Research UK Centre, Leeds, UK.

Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2012 May;23(5):1190-1197. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr366. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This multicenter randomized trial compared oral capecitabine with bolus i.v. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were assigned to 24 weeks of capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks or 5-FU/FA (Mayo Clinic regimen). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

The intent-to-treat population received capecitabine (n = 1004) or 5-FU/FA (n = 983). With a median follow-up of 6.9 years, capecitabine was at least equivalent to 5-FU/FA in terms of DFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-1.01] and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.74-1.01); the 95% CI upper limits were significantly less than the predefined noninferiority margins of 1.20 (P < 0.0001) and 1.14 (P < 0.001), respectively. This pattern was maintained in all subgroups, including patients aged ≥ 70 years. Preplanned multivariate analyses showed that capecitabine had statistically significant beneficial effects on DFS (P = 0.021) and OS (P = 0.020) versus 5-FU/FA. A post hoc analysis suggested that the occurrence of hand-foot syndrome may be associated with better outcomes in capecitabine recipients.

CONCLUSION

Oral capecitabine is an effective alternative to bolus 5-FU/FA as adjuvant treatment of patients with stage III colon cancer with efficacy benefits maintained at 5 years and in older patients.

摘要

背景

本多中心随机试验比较了卡培他滨口服与氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)/亚叶酸(FA)静脉推注作为 III 期结肠癌辅助治疗的疗效。

患者和方法

患者被随机分配接受卡培他滨(1250mg/m2,每日 2 次,第 1-14 天,每 3 周)或 5-FU/FA(Mayo 方案)治疗 24 周。主要终点是无病生存期(DFS)。

结果

意向治疗人群接受卡培他滨(n=1004)或 5-FU/FA(n=983)治疗。中位随访 6.9 年后,卡培他滨的 DFS(风险比[HR]为 0.88;95%置信区间[CI]为 0.77-1.01)和总生存期(OS)(HR 为 0.86;95%CI 为 0.74-1.01)与 5-FU/FA 至少相当;95%CI 的上限明显低于预设的非劣效性边界 1.20(P<0.0001)和 1.14(P<0.001)。这种模式在所有亚组中均保持一致,包括年龄≥70 岁的患者。预先设定的多变量分析显示,与 5-FU/FA 相比,卡培他滨在 DFS(P=0.021)和 OS(P=0.020)方面具有统计学显著的有益效果。事后分析表明,手足综合征的发生可能与卡培他滨治疗患者的更好结局相关。

结论

卡培他滨是 III 期结肠癌辅助治疗的有效替代方案,与氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸静脉推注相比,疗效在 5 年内保持不变,并且在老年患者中也有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验