Suppr超能文献

雷贝拉唑和埃索美拉唑治疗轻至中度糜烂性胃食管反流病:疗效与安全性的对比研究

Rabeprazole and esomeprazole in mild-to-moderate erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease: A comparative study of efficacy and safety.

作者信息

Maiti Rituparna, Jaida Jyothirmai, Israel P L John, Koyagura Narendar, Mukkisa Sruthi, Palani Anuradha

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagunur Road, Karimnagar, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2011 Jul;2(3):150-7. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.83278.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of rabeprazole and esomeprazole in mild-to-moderate erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized, single-blinded, outdoor-based clinical study was conducted on 60 patients of mild-to-moderate erosive GERD. After baseline clinical assessment and investigations, rabeprazole (40 mg) was prescribed to 30 patients and esomeprazole (40 mg) to another 30 patients for 4 weeks. The efficacy variables were change in GERD symptom scoring, endoscopic findings, and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) scoring over 4 weeks.

RESULT

Heartburn, acid regurgitation, and overall GERD symptom scoring (P = 0.01) were significantly decreased with rabeprazole in comparison to esomeprazole. The comparative study of all five domains of the QOLARD questionnaire including overall scoring revealed a statistically significant improvement in the rabeprazole group. Endoscopic findings in the rabeprazole group showed an absolute improvement of 30% and relative improvement of 55% over esomeprazole. Both the drugs were well tolerated having no significant difference in the incidence of adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Rabeprazole (40 mg) is a better choice for mild-to-moderate GERD compared with esomeprazole (40 mg) because of its better efficacy and safety profile.

摘要

目的

比较雷贝拉唑和埃索美拉唑治疗轻至中度糜烂性胃食管反流病(GERD)的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

对60例轻至中度糜烂性GERD患者进行了一项随机、单盲、户外临床研究。在进行基线临床评估和检查后,给30例患者开了雷贝拉唑(40毫克),给另外30例患者开了埃索美拉唑(40毫克),疗程为4周。疗效变量包括4周内GERD症状评分、内镜检查结果以及反流和消化不良生活质量(QOLRAD)评分的变化。

结果

与埃索美拉唑相比,雷贝拉唑治疗烧心、反酸及GERD总体症状评分(P = 0.01)显著降低。对包括总体评分在内的QOLARD问卷所有五个领域的比较研究显示,雷贝拉唑组有统计学意义的改善。雷贝拉唑组的内镜检查结果显示,与埃索美拉唑相比,绝对改善率为30%,相对改善率为55%。两种药物耐受性良好,不良反应发生率无显著差异。

结论

雷贝拉唑(40毫克)治疗轻至中度GERD比埃索美拉唑(40毫克)是更好的选择,因为其疗效和安全性更佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4682/3157122/de1ab4b56c93/JPP-2-150-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验