• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国微创手术根治性前列腺切除术应用方面种族差异的改善。

Improvement of racial disparities with respect to the utilization of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in the United States.

机构信息

Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2012 Apr 1;118(7):1894-900. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26527. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.26527
PMID:21898379
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Race represents an established barrier to health care access in the United States and elsewhere. We examined whether race affects the utilization rate of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) in a population-based sample of individuals from the United States.

METHODS

Within the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), we focused on patients in whom MIRP and open radical prostatectomy (ORP) were performed between 2001 and 2007. We assessed the proportions and temporal trends in race distributions between MIRP and ORP. Multivariable logistic regression analyses further adjusted for age, year of surgery, baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index, annual hospital caseload tertiles, hospital region, insurance status, and median zip code income.

RESULTS

Of 65,148 radical prostatectomies, 3581 (5.5%) were MIRPs. African Americans accounted for 11.4% of patients versus 78.8% for Caucasians versus 9.9% for others. Between 2001 and 2007, the annual proportions of Caucasian patients treated with MIRP were 2.2%, 0.9%, 2.6%, 7.2%, 4.7%, 9.3%, and 11.6%, respectively (chi-square trend p<0.001). For the same years in African American patients, the proportions were 0.8, 0.3, 1.4, 4.4, 3.5, 9.0 and 8.4% (chi-square trend P < .001). In multivariable analyses relative to Caucasian patients, African American patients were 14% less likely to undergo MIRP (P = .01). After period stratification between years 2001-2005 versus 2006-2007, African Americans were 22% less likely to undergo a MIRP in the early period (P = .007) versus 11% less likely to have a MIRP in the contemporary period (P = .1).

CONCLUSIONS

The racial discrepancies in MIRP utilization rates are gradually improving.

摘要

背景

在美国和其他国家,种族是获得医疗保健的既定障碍。我们研究了在来自美国的人群基础样本中,种族是否会影响微创根治性前列腺切除术(MIRP)的利用率。

方法

在医疗保健成本和利用项目全国住院患者样本(NIS)中,我们关注于 2001 年至 2007 年间接受 MIRP 和开放性根治性前列腺切除术(ORP)的患者。我们评估了 MIRP 和 ORP 之间种族分布的比例和时间趋势。多变量逻辑回归分析进一步调整了年龄、手术年份、基线 Charlson 合并症指数、医院年病例量 tertiles、医院区域、保险状况和中位数邮政编码收入。

结果

在 65148 例根治性前列腺切除术患者中,有 3581 例(5.5%)接受了 MIRP。非裔美国人占患者的 11.4%,白种人占 78.8%,其他人占 9.9%。在 2001 年至 2007 年间,每年接受 MIRP 治疗的白种人患者比例分别为 2.2%、0.9%、2.6%、7.2%、4.7%、9.3%和 11.6%(卡方趋势 P<0.001)。在同样的几年中,非裔美国人患者的比例分别为 0.8%、0.3%、1.4%、4.4%、3.5%、9.0%和 8.4%(卡方趋势 P <.001)。在多变量分析中,与白种人患者相比,非裔美国人患者接受 MIRP 的可能性低 14%(P=0.01)。在 2001-2005 年与 2006-2007 年期间进行的时期分层后,非裔美国人在早期接受 MIRP 的可能性低 22%(P=0.007),而在当代接受 MIRP 的可能性低 11%(P=0.1)。

结论

MIRP 利用率的种族差异正在逐渐改善。

相似文献

1
Improvement of racial disparities with respect to the utilization of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in the United States.美国微创手术根治性前列腺切除术应用方面种族差异的改善。
Cancer. 2012 Apr 1;118(7):1894-900. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26527. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
2
Diffusion of surgical innovations, patient safety, and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.手术创新的传播、患者安全和微创根治性前列腺切除术。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Aug;149(8):845-51. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.31.
3
Temporal national trends of minimally invasive and retropubic radical prostatectomy outcomes from 2003 to 2007: results from the 100% Medicare sample.2003 年至 2007 年微创和经耻骨后前列腺根治术的全国时间趋势:来自 100%医疗保险样本的结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):803-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.020. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
4
Racial disparities in lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database analysis.根治性前列腺切除术中淋巴结清扫的种族差异:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库分析。
Int J Urol. 2018 Nov;25(11):929-936. doi: 10.1111/iju.13780. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
5
A population-based analysis of temporal perioperative complication rates after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.基于人群的微创根治性前列腺切除术围手术期时间相关并发症发生率的分析。
Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):564-71. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.036. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
6
Comparative effectiveness, cost, and utilization of radical prostatectomy among young men within managed care insurance plans.在管理式医疗保险计划中,年轻男性接受根治性前列腺切除术的疗效、成本和利用情况比较。
Value Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):367-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
7
Perioperative outcomes and hospital reimbursement by type of radical prostatectomy: results from a privately insured patient population.根治性前列腺切除术类型的围手术期结局与医院报销情况:来自私人保险患者群体的结果
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015 Mar;18(1):13-7. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2014.38. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
8
Blood transfusions in radical prostatectomy: a contemporary population-based analysis.根治性前列腺切除术中的输血:一项基于当代人群的分析。
Urology. 2012 Feb;79(2):332-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.08.079.
9
The effect of minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy surgeon volume.微创和开放根治性前列腺切除术医师手术量的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2012 Sep;30(5):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Sep 6.
10
Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.微创根治性前列腺切除术的应用与疗效
J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 10;26(14):2278-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.4528.

引用本文的文献

1
Ventral hernia repair with permanent mesh for non-Hispanic black versus white patients: access and post-operative outcomes in the era of robotic surgery.非西班牙裔黑人和白人患者使用永久性补片进行腹疝修补术:机器人手术时代的手术入路和术后结局
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):560-567. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11252-5. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
2
Racial and ethnic disparities in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: testing the physician-level segregated and differential treatment hypotheses.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的种族和民族差异:检验医师层面的隔离和差异治疗假设。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Jul 1;8(4). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae061.
3
Robot-Assisted Surgery and Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Post-Prostatectomy Outcomes Among Prostate Cancer Patients.
机器人辅助手术与前列腺癌患者前列腺切除术后结局的种族和民族差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb;31(2):1373-1383. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14447-7. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
4
Disparities in Surgical Access: A Systematic Literature Review, Conceptual Model, and Evidence Map.手术可及性的差异:系统文献综述、概念模型与证据图谱
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Mar;228(3):276-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.028.
5
Socioeconomic factors and parity of access to robotic surgery in a county health system.县卫生系统中机器人手术的社会经济因素及可及性差异
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):35-41. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0683-3. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
6
Racial Differences in the Surgical Care of Medicare Beneficiaries With Localized Prostate Cancer.医疗保险受益人的局部前列腺癌手术治疗中的种族差异。
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jan;2(1):85-93. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3384.
7
National disparities in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.直肠癌微创手术的全国性差异。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1060-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4296-5. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
8
Disparities in the receipt of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: between-hospital and within-hospital analysis using 2009-2011 California inpatient data.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术接受情况的差异:基于2009 - 2011年加利福尼亚州住院患者数据的医院间及医院内分析
BMJ Open. 2015 May 3;5(4):e007409. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007409.
9
Incidence and risk factors for and the effect of a program to reduce the incidence of surgical site infection after cardiac surgery.心脏手术后手术部位感染的发生率、危险因素以及降低其发生率的项目效果。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Jun;15(3):299-304. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.048. Epub 2014 May 6.
10
A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术的手术量与治疗效果关系的系统评价
Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):786-98. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.012. Epub 2013 Apr 19.