Michigan State University.
Int J Urban Reg Res. 2011;35(3):659-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00999.x.
Since the early Chicago School, urban researchers have used residential proximity to assess contacts within and between racial and ethnic groups. This approach is increasingly limited. Diverse groups use email, social networking sites, instant messaging and mobile phones to communicate across urban zones and distant cities. These practices enable mutual support among far-flung family members and co-ethnics as they engage with an array of institutions throughout their day. Through interviews and observations that include women and men of diverse occupations, races and national origins, the author explores how and why cross-place enclosures of sociality and resources develop. Rather than framing the residential area as the locus of racial/ethnic concentration, the author focuses on cross-place concentrations in the technologically mediated workspace. This study enhances theorization of the structural negotiations, interpersonal pressures and group preferences that produce separate lifeworlds in globalizing cities.
自芝加哥学派早期以来,城市研究人员一直使用居住邻近度来评估种族和族裔群体内部和群体之间的接触。这种方法的局限性越来越大。不同群体使用电子邮件、社交网络、即时通讯和移动电话在城市区域和遥远的城市之间进行交流。这些做法使远在他乡的家庭成员和同族人在他们一天中与各种机构打交道时能够相互支持。通过对不同职业、种族和国籍的男女进行的访谈和观察,作者探讨了跨地域的社会性和资源是如何以及为何发展起来的。作者并没有将居住区域作为种族/族裔集中的场所,而是将重点放在技术媒介工作场所的跨地域集中上。这项研究增强了对全球化城市中产生不同生活世界的结构性谈判、人际压力和群体偏好的理论化。