• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿片类药物直肠给药的综述。

Review of the rectal use of opioids.

作者信息

Cole L, Hanning C D

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 1990 Apr;5(2):118-26. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(05)80025-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0885-3924(05)80025-9
PMID:2189930
Abstract

The rectal route for the administration of opioid analgesics is often forgotten by physicians seeking alternatives to the oral route. This article reviews the physiology of rectal drug absorption and such data as exists on the different opioids that have been administered by this route. Conventional fatty-based suppositories have a place in the management of chronic pain but the variability in dissolution and drug absorption limit their usefulness. Recently, sustained release vehicles have become available that offer the prospect of the attainment of steady analgesic drug concentrations with once or twice daily dosing. Early studies with the morphine hydrogel suppository suggest that it may be capable of fulfilling this prospect. Their inherent safety, as dose-dumping is impossible, will make them suitable for use in the home.

摘要

寻求口服途径替代方法的医生常常会忽略阿片类镇痛药的直肠给药途径。本文回顾了直肠药物吸收的生理学以及通过该途径给药的不同阿片类药物的现有数据。传统的脂肪基栓剂在慢性疼痛管理中占有一席之地,但溶解和药物吸收的变异性限制了它们的效用。最近,缓释制剂已经出现,有望通过每日给药一次或两次达到稳定的镇痛药浓度。早期对吗啡水凝胶栓剂的研究表明,它可能有能力实现这一前景。由于不可能出现剂量倾泻,其固有的安全性将使其适合在家中使用。

相似文献

1
Review of the rectal use of opioids.阿片类药物直肠给药的综述。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1990 Apr;5(2):118-26. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(05)80025-9.
2
Rectal, buccal, and sublingual narcotics for the management of cancer pain.
J Palliat Care. 1991 Spring;7(1):30-5.
3
The influence of the route of administration: a comparative study at steady state of oral sustained release morphine and morphine sulfate suppositories.给药途径的影响:口服缓释吗啡与硫酸吗啡栓剂稳态的比较研究。
Ther Drug Monit. 1999 Apr;21(2):208-14. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199904000-00011.
4
5
Sustained relief of chronic pain. Pharmacokinetics of sustained release morphine.慢性疼痛的持续缓解。缓释吗啡的药代动力学。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998 Sep;35(3):173-90. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199835030-00002.
6
Opioid and adjuvant analgesics: compared and contrasted.阿片类和辅助镇痛药:比较与对比
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2011 Aug;28(5):378-83. doi: 10.1177/1049909111410298. Epub 2011 May 26.
7
Pharmacokinetics of rectal drug administration, Part I. General considerations and clinical applications of centrally acting drugs.直肠给药的药代动力学,第一部分。中枢作用药物的一般考虑因素和临床应用。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1991 Jul;21(1):11-26. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199121010-00002.
8
Opioids by the rectal route.经直肠途径使用阿片类药物。
Am J Nurs. 1999 Nov;99(11):20.
9
Spinal opioid analgesia. A critical update.脊髓阿片类镇痛。重要更新。
Drugs. 1988 Jun;35(6):597-603. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198835060-00001.
10
Opioid analgesics in cancer pain: current practice and controversies.癌症疼痛中的阿片类镇痛药:当前的实践与争议
Cancer Surv. 1988;7(1):29-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomized double-blind, double-dummy crossover clinical trial of oral tramadol versus rectal tramadol administration in opioid-naive cancer patients with pain.口服曲马多与直肠给予曲马多用于初用阿片类药物的癌症疼痛患者的随机双盲、双模拟交叉临床试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2005 Sep;13(9):702-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0760-9. Epub 2005 Jan 12.
2
Bioavailabilities of rectal and oral methadone in healthy subjects.健康受试者中直肠和口服美沙酮的生物利用度。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Aug;58(2):156-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02116.x.