Suppr超能文献

带气道一体式硅胶鼻中隔夹板是否能减少术后咽鼓管功能障碍?

Do silicone nasal septal splints with integral airway reduce postoperative eustachian tube dysfunction?

机构信息

Ministry of Health, Sakarya Education and Research Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sakarya, Turkey.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Jan;146(1):141-5. doi: 10.1177/0194599811421595. Epub 2011 Sep 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the effects of Merocel nasal packs and silicone nasal septal splints with integral airway on the ventilation and pressure of the middle ear when applied intranasally after septoplasty for isolated septal deviation.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, randomized trial.

SETTING

A tertiary referral center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients who underwent septoplasty for nasal respiratory impairment caused by septal deviation were randomized into 2 groups. After septoplasty, bilateral anterior Merocel nasal packs were applied in one group, while silicone nasal septal splints with integral airway were applied in the other group. Middle ear pressures were compared using preoperative and post-operative tympanometry.

RESULTS

Pathological decrease in the middle ear pressure in at least 1 ear was determined in 17 patients (73.9%) in the Merocel group compared with only 6 patients (21.4%) in the silicone nasal septal splint group at the 48th postoperative hour. In the first 24 hours following surgery, decreases in tympanometric pressures were seen in both groups, but more in the Merocel group. After 24 hours, middle ear pressures continued to decrease in the Merocel group but started to increase in the silicone nasal septal splint group.

CONCLUSION

Because they allow inhalation through the nose and cause less Eustachian tube dysfunction than Merocel, using silicone nasal septal splints with integral airway instead of packing after septoplasty seems a more reasonable option.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较 Merocel 鼻腔填塞和带一体式气道的硅胶鼻中隔夹板对鼻中隔偏曲患者鼻中隔成形术后鼻腔内应用时对中耳通气和压力的影响。

研究设计

前瞻性、随机试验。

设置

三级转诊中心。

受试者和方法

51 例因鼻中隔偏曲导致鼻腔呼吸障碍而行鼻中隔成形术的患者被随机分为 2 组。一组在鼻中隔成形术后双侧鼻腔填塞 Merocel 前鼻栓,另一组在鼻中隔成形术后应用带一体式气道的硅胶鼻中隔夹板。使用术前和术后鼓室压图比较中耳压力。

结果

Merocel 组有 17 例(73.9%)患者至少有 1 耳的中耳压力病理性降低,而硅胶鼻中隔夹板组只有 6 例(21.4%)患者在术后第 48 小时出现这种情况。术后前 24 小时,两组的鼓室压图均有下降,但 Merocel 组下降更明显。24 小时后,Merocel 组中耳压力继续下降,而硅胶鼻中隔夹板组中耳压力开始上升。

结论

与 Merocel 相比,带一体式气道的硅胶鼻中隔夹板允许经鼻吸入,且对咽鼓管功能的影响较小,因此在鼻中隔成形术后使用带一体式气道的硅胶鼻中隔夹板代替填塞似乎是更合理的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验