• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ACE 抑制剂和 ARBs 的顺应性、持久性和转换模式。

Compliance, persistence, and switching patterns for ACE inhibitors and ARBs.

机构信息

Unit of Pharmaco-Epidemiology and PharmacoEconomics, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2011 Sep;17(9):609-16.

PMID:21902446
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate compliance, persistence, and switching patterns for angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).

STUDY DESIGN

Drug-utilization analysis using a large prescription database.

METHODS

Prescription data for more than 50,000 incident users of ACE inhibitors or ARBs were collected, cumulating close to 200,000 patient-years of medication use. Incidence, drug dosage, 1-year compliance, long-term persistence, and switching patterns were analyzed. The specific drugs investigated were captopril, enalapril, lisinopril, perindopril, ramipril, and fosinopril (ACE inhibitors), and losartan, valsartan, irbesartan, candesartan, and olmesartan (ARBs). Results were adjusted for age, sex, starting date, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

The 1-year compliance (88.3% vs 88.3%, P = .996) and 3-year persistence (81.9% vs 82.4%, P = .197) rates were similar between ACE inhibitors and ARBs. Users of ACE inhibitors more often switched therapy (24.2% vs 13.1%, P <.001), primarily to an ARB. Variations in compliance, persistence, and switching behavior were detected between specific ACE inhibitors, but not between specific ARBs.

CONCLUSIONS

Although residual confounding and indication bias cannot be ruled out, this study showed that compliance, persistence, and switching behavior varied between specific ACE inhibitors but not between specific ARBs. These results support prescribing of cheap generic ARBs as opposed to expensive ARBs. Apart from factors leading to therapy switches, compliance and persistence were similar between ACE inhibitors and ARBs.

摘要

目的

研究血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)的依从性、持久性和转换模式。

研究设计

使用大型处方数据库进行药物利用分析。

方法

收集了超过 50000 名 ACE 抑制剂或 ARB 新使用者的处方数据,累积了近 200000 名患者的用药年数。分析了发病率、药物剂量、1 年依从性、长期持久性和转换模式。研究的具体药物包括卡托普利、依那普利、赖诺普利、培哚普利、雷米普利和福辛普利(ACE 抑制剂)以及氯沙坦、缬沙坦、厄贝沙坦、坎地沙坦和奥美沙坦(ARB)。结果根据年龄、性别、起始日期和合并症进行了调整。

结果

ACE 抑制剂和 ARB 的 1 年依从率(88.3% vs 88.3%,P =.996)和 3 年持久率(81.9% vs 82.4%,P =.197)相似。ACE 抑制剂使用者更常转换治疗(24.2% vs 13.1%,P <.001),主要转换为 ARB。在特定 ACE 抑制剂之间检测到依从性、持久性和转换行为的差异,但在特定 ARB 之间没有检测到差异。

结论

尽管不能排除残留混杂和适应证偏倚,但本研究表明,特定 ACE 抑制剂之间的依从性、持久性和转换行为存在差异,但特定 ARB 之间没有差异。这些结果支持处方廉价的通用 ARB 而不是昂贵的 ARB。除了导致治疗转换的因素外,ACE 抑制剂和 ARB 的依从性和持久性相似。

相似文献

1
Compliance, persistence, and switching patterns for ACE inhibitors and ARBs.ACE 抑制剂和 ARBs 的顺应性、持久性和转换模式。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Sep;17(9):609-16.
2
Physician-specific variation in medication adherence among diabetes patients.糖尿病患者用药依从性的医师特异性差异。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Nov;17(11):729-36.
3
Reducing costs and improving hypertension management.降低成本并改善高血压管理。
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Winter;16(1):e151-5. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
4
Retrospective claims database analysis to determine relationship between renin-angiotensin system agents, rehospitalization, and health care costs in patients with heart failure or myocardial infarction.回顾性索赔数据库分析,以确定肾素-血管紧张素系统药物、再住院率与心力衰竭或心肌梗死患者医疗费用之间的关系。
Clin Ther. 2008;30 Pt 2:2217-27. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.12.005.
5
Long-term persistence to mono and combination therapies with angiotensin converting enzymes and angiotensin II receptor blockers in Australia.澳大利亚使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂进行单药治疗和联合治疗的长期持续性。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jun;72(6):765-71. doi: 10.1007/s00228-016-2037-x. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
6
Angiotensin II receptor antagonists and heart failure: angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors remain the first-line option.血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂与心力衰竭:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂仍是一线选择。
Prescrire Int. 2005 Oct;14(79):180-6.
7
Association of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers with keratinocyte cancer prevention in the randomized VATTC trial.在随机VATTC试验中血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与预防角质形成细胞癌的关联
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 3;100(17):1223-32. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn262. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
8
Uptake of angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension.血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂在高血压治疗中的应用。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jul;61(5-6):461-6. doi: 10.1007/s00228-005-0924-7. Epub 2005 May 24.
9
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers and the risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis in antihypertensive drug users.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂与降压药使用者类风湿关节炎发病风险的关系。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Aug;21(8):835-43. doi: 10.1002/pds.3291. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
10
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers for diabetic nephropathy: a retrospective comparison.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗糖尿病肾病的回顾性比较。
J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2009 Dec;10(4):195-200. doi: 10.1177/1470320309352352.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers on cardiovascular outcomes in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a target trial emulation study.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂对老年2型糖尿病患者心血管结局的比较疗效:一项目标试验模拟研究
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 May 6;24(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02753-1.
2
Adherence and persistence to pharmacotherapy in patients with heart failure: a nationwide cohort study, 2014-2020.心力衰竭患者药物治疗的依从性和持久性:一项全国性队列研究,2014-2020 年。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;10(1):405-415. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14206. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
3
Gender Differences in Non-Persistence with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers among Older Hypertensive Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease.
老年高血压合并外周动脉疾病患者中,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗依从性的性别差异
Biomedicines. 2022 Jun 22;10(7):1479. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10071479.
4
Perioperative use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.心脏手术患者围术期使用肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂与结局的关系。
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 13;10(1):4202. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11678-9.
5
Comparison of Different Strategies to Measure Medication Adherence via Claims Data in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure.比较通过慢性心力衰竭患者的理赔数据来衡量药物依从性的不同策略。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jul;106(1):211-218. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1378. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
6
Prescription patterns of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for various indications: A UK population-based study.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂用于各种适应证的处方模式:一项基于英国人群的研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;84(10):2365-2372. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13692. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
7
In search of a standard when analyzing medication adherence in patients with heart failure using claims data: a systematic review.使用索赔数据分析心力衰竭患者药物依从性的标准:系统评价。
Heart Fail Rev. 2018 Jan;23(1):63-71. doi: 10.1007/s10741-017-9656-x.
8
The association of renin-angiotensin system blockades and pneumonia requiring admission in patients with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中肾素-血管紧张素系统阻滞剂与需要住院治疗的肺炎之间的关联。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Sep 9;11:2159-2166. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S104097. eCollection 2016.
9
Change in prescription pattern as a potential marker for adverse drug reactions of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.处方模式的变化作为血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂药物不良反应的潜在标志物。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Dec;37(6):1095-103. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0159-3. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
10
Measuring drug exposure: concordance between defined daily dose and days' supply depended on drug class.测量药物暴露量:限定日剂量与用药天数之间的一致性取决于药物类别。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.026. Epub 2015 Jun 4.