Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Sep 9;11:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-128.
Qualitative methodologies are increasingly popular in medical research. Grounded theory is the methodology most-often cited by authors of qualitative studies in medicine, but it has been suggested that many 'grounded theory' studies are not concordant with the methodology. In this paper we provide a worked example of a grounded theory project. Our aim is to provide a model for practice, to connect medical researchers with a useful methodology, and to increase the quality of 'grounded theory' research published in the medical literature.
We documented a worked example of using grounded theory methodology in practice.
We describe our sampling, data collection, data analysis and interpretation. We explain how these steps were consistent with grounded theory methodology, and show how they related to one another. Grounded theory methodology assisted us to develop a detailed model of the process of adapting preventive protocols into dental practice, and to analyse variation in this process in different dental practices.
By employing grounded theory methodology rigorously, medical researchers can better design and justify their methods, and produce high-quality findings that will be more useful to patients, professionals and the research community.
定性方法在医学研究中越来越受欢迎。扎根理论是医学领域定性研究作者引用最多的方法,但有人认为,许多“扎根理论”研究与该方法并不一致。本文提供了一个扎根理论项目的实例。我们的目的是为实践提供一个模型,将医学研究人员与有用的方法联系起来,并提高医学文献中发表的“扎根理论”研究的质量。
我们记录了一个在实践中使用扎根理论方法的实例。
我们描述了我们的抽样、数据收集、数据分析和解释。我们解释了这些步骤如何与扎根理论方法一致,并展示了它们是如何相互关联的。扎根理论方法帮助我们详细地描述了将预防方案应用于牙科实践的过程,并分析了不同牙科实践中这一过程的变化。
通过严格采用扎根理论方法,医学研究人员可以更好地设计和证明他们的方法,并产生更有益于患者、专业人员和研究界的高质量研究结果。