Maaß Laura, Zeeb Hajo, Rothgang Heinz
University of Bremen, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, Department Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, Bremen, Germany.
Leibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Apr 12;7(1):92. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01078-9.
Unlocking the full potential of digital public health (DiPH) systems requires a comprehensive tool to assess their maturity. While the World Health Organization and the International Telecommunication Union released a toolkit in 2012 covering various aspects of digitalizing national healthcare systems, a holistic maturity assessment tool has been lacking ever since. To bridge this gap, we conducted a pioneering Delphi study, to which 54 experts from diverse continents and academic fields actively contributed to at least one of three rounds. 54 experts participated in developing and rating multidisciplinary quality indicators to measure the maturity of national digital public health systems. Participants established consensus on these indicators with a threshold of 70% agreement on indicator importance. Eventually, 96 indicators were identified and agreed upon by experts. Notably, 48% of these indicators were found to align with existing validated tools, highlighting their relevance and reliability. However, further investigation is required to assess the suitability and applicability of all the suggestions put forward by our participants. Nevertheless, this Delphi study is an essential initial stride toward a comprehensive measurement tool for DiPH system maturity. By working towards a standardized assessment of DiPH system maturity, we aim to empower decision-makers to make informed choices, optimize resource allocation, and drive innovation in healthcare delivery. The results of this study mark a significant milestone in advancing DiPH on a global scale.
释放数字公共卫生(DiPH)系统的全部潜力需要一个全面的工具来评估其成熟度。虽然世界卫生组织和国际电信联盟在2012年发布了一个涵盖国家医疗系统数字化各个方面的工具包,但从那时起就一直缺乏一个全面的成熟度评估工具。为了填补这一空白,我们开展了一项开创性的德尔菲研究,来自不同大陆和学术领域的54位专家积极参与了三轮研究中的至少一轮。54位专家参与制定和评估多学科质量指标,以衡量国家数字公共卫生系统的成熟度。参与者就这些指标达成了共识,指标重要性的一致同意阈值为70%。最终,专家们确定并认可了96项指标。值得注意的是,其中48%的指标与现有的经过验证的工具一致,突出了它们的相关性和可靠性。然而,需要进一步调查以评估我们的参与者提出的所有建议的适用性和实用性。尽管如此,这项德尔菲研究是朝着DiPH系统成熟度综合测量工具迈出的重要第一步。通过致力于对DiPH系统成熟度进行标准化评估,我们旨在使决策者能够做出明智的选择,优化资源分配,并推动医疗服务的创新。这项研究的结果标志着在全球范围内推进DiPH方面的一个重要里程碑。