• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多支冠状动脉疾病风险评估的功能性 SYNTAX 评分。

Functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in multivessel coronary artery disease.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California 94305, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 13;58(12):1211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.020.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.020
PMID:21903052
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study was aimed at investigating whether a fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided SYNTAX score (SS), termed "functional SYNTAX score" (FSS), would predict clinical outcome better than the classic SS in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

The SS is a purely anatomic score based on the coronary angiogram and predicts outcome after PCI in patients with multivessel CAD. FFR-guided PCI improves outcomes by adding functional information to the anatomic information obtained from the angiogram.

METHODS

The SS was prospectively collected in 497 patients enrolled in the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. FSS was determined by only counting ischemia-producing lesions (FFR ≤ 0.80). The ability of each score to predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year was compared.

RESULTS

The 497 patients were divided into tertiles of risk based on the SS. After determining the FSS for each patient, 32% moved to a lower-risk group as follows. MACE occurred in 9.0%, 11.3%, and 26.7% of patients in the low-, medium-, and high-FSS groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Only FSS and procedure time were independent predictors of 1-year MACE. FSS demonstrated a better predictive accuracy for MACE compared with SS (Harrell's C of FSS, 0.677 vs. SS, 0.630, p = 0.02; integrated discrimination improvement of 1.94%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Recalculating SS by only incorporating ischemia-producing lesions as determined by FFR decreases the number of higher-risk patients and better discriminates risk for adverse events in patients with multivessel CAD undergoing PCI.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的多支血管病变冠心病(CAD)患者中,基于血流储备分数(FFR)的 SYNTAX 评分(SS),即“功能 SYNTAX 评分”(FSS),是否比经典 SS 更能预测临床结局。

背景

SS 是一种基于冠状动脉造影的纯解剖评分,可预测多支 CAD 患者 PCI 后的结局。FFR 指导下的 PCI 通过在造影获得的解剖信息中加入功能信息,改善了预后。

方法

前瞻性收集了 497 例 FAME(血流储备分数与多支血管评估的血管造影比较)研究中的患者的 SS。FSS 仅通过计算引起缺血的病变(FFR ≤ 0.80)来确定。比较了两种评分预测 1 年主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的能力。

结果

497 例患者根据 SS 分为风险三分位数。确定每位患者的 FSS 后,32%的患者转移到低危组,具体情况如下。低、中、高 FSS 组患者的 MACE 发生率分别为 9.0%、11.3%和 26.7%(p < 0.001)。只有 FSS 和手术时间是 1 年 MACE 的独立预测因素。与 SS 相比,FSS 对 MACE 的预测准确性更高(FSS 的 Harrell C 为 0.677,SS 为 0.630,p = 0.02;综合判别改善 1.94%,p < 0.001)。

结论

仅通过 FFR 确定引起缺血的病变重新计算 SS,可减少高危患者的数量,并更好地区分接受 PCI 的多支 CAD 患者不良事件的风险。

相似文献

1
Functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in multivessel coronary artery disease.多支冠状动脉疾病风险评估的功能性 SYNTAX 评分。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 13;58(12):1211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.020.
2
Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients With Multivessel CAD.多支血管 CAD 患者的计算机断层扫描血管造影衍生的血流储备分数。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jun 19;71(24):2756-2769. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.053. Epub 2018 May 22.
3
Changing of SYNTAX score performing fractional flow reserve in multivessel coronary artery disease.SYNTAX 评分在多支冠状动脉疾病中进行的分数血流储备改变。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2012 Jun;13(6):368-75. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283536adc.
4
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.多支血管病变患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中血流储备分数与血管造影的比较:多支血管评估血流储备分数与血管造影(FAME)研究的 2 年随访。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 13;56(3):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012. Epub 2010 May 28.
5
Fractional flow reserve in unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experience from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.不稳定型心绞痛和非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中从 FAME(血流储备分数与血管造影多血管评估)研究中获得的经验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Nov;4(11):1183-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.008.
6
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.多支冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中血流储备分数与血管造影指导的比较(FAME):一项随机对照试验的 5 年随访结果。
Lancet. 2015 Nov 7;386(10006):1853-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00057-4. Epub 2015 Aug 30.
7
The Prognostic Value of Residual Coronary Stenoses After Functionally Complete Revascularization.功能完全血运重建后残余冠状动脉狭窄的预后价值。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Apr 12;67(14):1701-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.056.
8
The impact of sex differences on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) substudy.性别差异对血流储备分数指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的影响:FAME(血流储备分数与多血管评估的血管造影)子研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Oct;5(10):1037-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.016.
9
Outcomes Based on Angiographic vs Functional Significance of Complex 3-Vessel Coronary Disease: FAME 3 Trial.基于复杂三支血管冠状动脉疾病血管造影与功能意义的结果:FAME 3试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Sep 11;16(17):2112-2119. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.06.023.
10
Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.在 FAME 研究中,血管造影与功能严重程度评估冠状动脉狭窄:血流储备分数与多血管造影比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 22;55(25):2816-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.096.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanding risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes with systemic indices: HALP and CALLY.利用全身指标扩展急性冠脉综合征的风险分层:HALP和CALLY。
Biomark Med. 2025 Jun;19(12):451-453. doi: 10.1080/17520363.2025.2517525. Epub 2025 Jun 8.
2
Functional Coronary Revascularization: A Valuable Underutilized Diagnostic Approach.功能性冠状动脉血运重建:一种未得到充分利用的有价值的诊断方法。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 5;25(12):430. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512430. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Utilization of SYNTAX Score II for Predictive Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Renal Insufficiency Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
应用SYNTAX评分II预测冠状动脉疾病合并慢性肾功能不全患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的临床结局
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct 22;25(10):371. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2510371. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Prognostic Value of Quantitative Flow Ratio Combined with SYNTAX Scores I/II in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Small-Sample, Single-Center Study.定量血流比联合SYNTAX评分I/II在多支冠状动脉疾病中的预后价值:一项小样本、单中心研究
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 18;25(9):329. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2509329. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Progress in the Application of the Residual SYNTAX Score and Its Derived Scores.残余SYNTAX评分及其衍生评分的应用进展
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 1;25(3):80. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2503080. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
The Utility of the SYNTAX Score II and SYNTAX Score 2020 for Identifying Patients with Three-Vessel Disease Eligible for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Multivessel TALENT Trial: A Prospective Pilot Experience.SYNTAX评分II和2020年SYNTAX评分在多支血管TALENT试验中识别适合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的三支血管疾病患者的效用:一项前瞻性试点经验
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 8;23(4):133. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2304133. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve for Heart Team decision-making in multivessel disease: the randomised, multicentre DECISION QFR trial.定量血流比与分数血流储备在多血管病变心脏团队决策中的应用:随机、多中心 DECISION QFR 试验。
EuroIntervention. 2024 May 10;20(9):561-570. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00674.
8
Coronary bypass surgery guided by computed tomography in a low-risk population.低危人群中基于计算机断层扫描的冠状动脉旁路移植术。
Eur Heart J. 2024 May 27;45(20):1804-1815. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae199.
9
Consensus document on the clinical application of invasive functional coronary angiography from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.日本心血管介入治疗协会关于有创功能冠状动脉造影临床应用的共识文件。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Apr;39(2):109-125. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-00988-5. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
10
Why percutaneous revascularisation might not reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and mortality in patients with stable CAD?经皮血运重建术为何不能降低稳定性 CAD 患者心肌梗死和死亡风险?
Open Heart. 2023 Oct;10(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002343.