• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心包引流延长组与非延长组患者心包填塞复发频率。

Frequency of recurrence of pericardial tamponade in patients with extended versus nonextended pericardial catheter drainage.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2011 Dec 15;108(12):1820-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.07.057. Epub 2011 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.07.057
PMID:21907951
Abstract

Recurrence of pericardial tamponade is relatively common after pericardiocentesis. We evaluated the clinical and procedural predictors of recurrent pericardial tamponade after pericardiocentesis. We included 157 consecutive patients with pericardial tamponade (age 62 ± 18 years, 54% men) who had undergone pericardiocentesis from 2000 to 2007. An intrapericardial catheter was used for prolonged drainage of the pericardial effusion (78% of cases) at the discretion of the operator. The overall recurrence rate 11.8 ± 0.6 months after pericardiocentesis was 20% and the mean interval to recurrence was 1.2 ± 2.1 months. However, patients with extended catheter drainage had a reduced recurrence rate of 12% compared to 52% in patients without extended drainage (p <0.001). In the Cox regression modeling, absence of extended drainage (hazard ratio [HR] 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 to 10, p = 0.002), incomplete drainage of pericardial effusion (HR 9.7, 95% CI 3.6 to 22.7, p <0.001), loculated effusion (HR 11.1, 95% CI 2.9 to 43, p = 0.001), and malignancy (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.8 to 10.3, p = 0.037) independently correlated with recurrence at 1 year. In conclusion, extended pericardial drainage after catheter placement is associated with a reduced recurrence of pericardial tamponade after pericardiocentesis.

摘要

心包穿刺后心包填塞复发相对常见。我们评估了心包穿刺后心包填塞复发的临床和操作预测因素。我们纳入了 2000 年至 2007 年期间因心包填塞而行心包穿刺的 157 例连续患者(年龄 62 ± 18 岁,54%为男性)。根据操作者的判断,使用心包内导管对心包积液进行长时间引流(78%的病例)。心包穿刺后 11.8 ± 0.6 个月的总体复发率为 20%,平均复发间隔为 1.2 ± 2.1 个月。然而,与未行延长引流的患者(52%)相比,行延长引流的患者复发率较低(12%)(p <0.001)。在 Cox 回归模型中,无延长引流(危险比 [HR] 4.1,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.7 至 10,p = 0.002)、心包积液引流不完全(HR 9.7,95% CI 3.6 至 22.7,p <0.001)、局限性积液(HR 11.1,95% CI 2.9 至 43,p = 0.001)和恶性肿瘤(HR 3.3,95% CI 1.8 至 10.3,p = 0.037)与 1 年后的复发独立相关。总之,导管放置后延长心包引流与心包穿刺后心包填塞复发率降低相关。

相似文献

1
Frequency of recurrence of pericardial tamponade in patients with extended versus nonextended pericardial catheter drainage.心包引流延长组与非延长组患者心包填塞复发频率。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Dec 15;108(12):1820-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.07.057. Epub 2011 Sep 10.
2
Long-term follow-up of idiopathic chronic pericardial effusion.特发性慢性心包积液的长期随访
N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 30;341(27):2054-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912303412704.
3
Pericardiocentesis.心包穿刺术
Crit Care Clin. 1992 Oct;8(4):699-712.
4
Outcomes of primary and secondary treatment of pericardial effusion in patients with malignancy.恶性肿瘤患者心包积液的初次及二次治疗结果
Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Mar;75(3):248-53. doi: 10.4065/75.3.248.
5
The efficiency of surgical subxiphoid pericardial drainage and percutaneous pericardial drainage in pericardial effusions associated with cardiac tamponade.剑突下心包切开引流术与经皮心包引流术治疗心脏压塞相关性心包积液的疗效比较
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2013 Mar-Apr;108(2):226-33.
6
Consecutive 1127 therapeutic echocardiographically guided pericardiocenteses: clinical profile, practice patterns, and outcomes spanning 21 years.连续1127例经超声心动图引导的心包穿刺术:21年的临床概况、实践模式及结果
Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 May;77(5):429-36. doi: 10.4065/77.5.429.
7
Determinants of pericardial drainage for cardiac tamponade following cardiac surgery.心脏手术后心脏压塞行心包引流的决定因素。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 May;39(5):e107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.12.021. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
8
Retrospective comparison of outcomes, diagnostic value, and complications of percutaneous prolonged drainage versus surgical pericardiotomy of pericardial effusion associated with malignancy.回顾性比较恶性肿瘤相关性心包积液行经皮持续引流与外科心包切开术的疗效、诊断价值和并发症。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;112(8):1235-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.066. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
9
[Catheter drainage of late cardiac tamponade guided by computed tomography].[计算机断层扫描引导下晚期心脏压塞的导管引流]
Kyobu Geka. 1999 Mar;52(3):192-6.
10
[Pericardiocentesis afrer heart surgery--our experience].[心脏手术后的心包穿刺术——我们的经验]
Vnitr Lek. 2008 Apr;54(4):334-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Management Strategies for Pericardial Effusion-A Systematic Review.心包积液的外科治疗策略——一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 14;14(14):4985. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144985.
2
Iatrogenic Pneumopericardium After Pericardiocentesis: A Systematic Review and Case Report.心包穿刺术后医源性心包积气:一项系统评价与病例报告
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Jun 26;12(7):246. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12070246.
3
Incidence of secondary pericardial effusions associated with different etiologies: a comprehensive review of literature.不同病因相关的继发性心包积液的发病率:文献综述
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Feb 22;20(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13019-025-03370-5.
4
Pericardiocentesis: History, Current Practice, and Future Directions.心包穿刺术:历史、当前实践及未来方向。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Dec;26(12):1377-1384. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02134-2. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
5
Asymptomatic Chronic Large Pericardial Effusions: To Drain or to Observe?无症状慢性大量心包积液:引流还是观察?
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 2;13(13):3887. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133887.
6
Pericardial Windows: The Limited Diagnostic Value of Non-Targeted Pericardial Biopsy.心包窗:非靶向性心包活检的有限诊断价值。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Oct;120(10):e20230082. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230082.
7
Incidence of malignant pericardial effusion in pericardiocentesis patients and post-procedure care: an oncology center pilot study.心包穿刺患者恶性心包积液的发生率及术后护理:一项肿瘤中心的初步研究。
Am J Transl Res. 2023 May 15;15(5):3355-3364. eCollection 2023.
8
Cardiac tamponade in COVID-19 patients: Management and outcomes.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的心脏压塞:管理与结局
J Card Surg. 2020 Nov;35(11):3183-3190. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14925. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
9
Cardiac Tamponade Caused by : An Updated and Comprehensive Review of the Literature.由……引起的心包填塞:文献的最新综合综述
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2020 Jul 14;2020:9598210. doi: 10.1155/2020/9598210. eCollection 2020.
10
Effectiveness and outcomes of 2 therapeutic interventions for cardiac tamponade: A retrospective observational study.两种心脏压塞治疗干预措施的有效性及结果:一项回顾性观察研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 17;99(29):e21290. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021290.