Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Depress Anxiety. 2011 Sep;28(9):824-52. doi: 10.1002/da.20874.
We present recommendations for revision of the diagnostic criteria for the Dissociative Disorders (DDs) for DSM-5. The periodic revision of the DSM provides an opportunity to revisit the assumptions underlying specific diagnoses and the empirical support, or lack of it, for the defining diagnostic criteria.
This paper reviews clinical, phenomenological, epidemiological, cultural, and neurobiological data related to the DDs in order to generate an up-to-date, evidence-based set of DD diagnoses and diagnostic criteria for DSM-5. First, we review the definitions of dissociation and the differences between the definitions of dissociation and conceptualization of DDs in the DSM-IV-TR and the ICD-10, respectively. Also, we review more general conceptual issues in defining dissociation and dissociative disorders. Based on this review, we propose a revised definition of dissociation for DSM-5 and discuss the implications of this definition for understanding dissociative symptoms and disorders.
We make the following recommendations for DSM-5: 1. Depersonalization Disorder (DPD) should derealization symptoms as well. 2. Dissociative Fugue should become a subtype of Dissociative Amnesia (DA). 3. The diagnostic criteria for DID should be changed to emphasize the disruptive nature of the dissociation and amnesia for everyday as well as traumatic events. The experience of possession should be included in the definition of identity disruption. 4. Should Dissociative Trance Disorder should be included in the Unspecified Dissociative Disorder (UDD) category.
There is a growing body of evidence linking the dissociative disorders to a trauma history, and to specific neural mechanisms.
我们提出了修订《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-5)中分离障碍(DD)诊断标准的建议。DSM 的定期修订为重新审视特定诊断背后的假设以及支持或缺乏支持诊断标准的经验证据提供了机会。
本文回顾了与 DD 相关的临床、现象学、流行病学、文化和神经生物学数据,以生成一套最新的、基于证据的 DD 诊断和 DSM-5 诊断标准。首先,我们回顾了分离的定义以及 DSM-IV-TR 和 ICD-10 中分别对分离和 DD 概念化的定义之间的区别。此外,我们还回顾了更一般的分离和分离障碍定义的概念问题。基于此回顾,我们为 DSM-5 提出了一个修订后的分离定义,并讨论了这个定义对理解分离症状和障碍的影响。
我们为 DSM-5 提出了以下建议:1. 人格解体障碍(DPD)应包括现实解体症状。2. 分离性神游症应成为分离性遗忘症(DA)的一个亚型。3. 分离性身份障碍的诊断标准应改为强调分离和对日常及创伤性事件的遗忘的破坏性。应将附身体验纳入身份障碍的定义中。4. 分离性恍惚障碍应纳入未特定分离性障碍(UDD)类别。
越来越多的证据将分离障碍与创伤史以及特定的神经机制联系起来。