National Center for PTSD, US Department of Veteran Affairs, VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA.
Depress Anxiety. 2011 Sep;28(9):737-49. doi: 10.1002/da.20845. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
This review examines the question of whether there should be a cluster of disorders, including the adjustment disorders (ADs), acute stress disorder (ASD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and the dissociative disorders (DDs), in a section devoted to abnormal responses to stress and trauma in the DSM-5. Environmental risk factors, including the individual's developmental experience, would thus become a major diagnostic consideration. The relationship of these disorders to one another is examined and also their relationship to other anxiety disorders to determine whether they are better grouped with anxiety disorders or a new specific grouping of trauma and stressor-related disorders. First how stress responses have been classified since DSM-III is reviewed. The major focus is on PTSD because it has received the most attention, regarding its proper placement among the psychiatric diagnoses. It is discussed whether PTSD should be considered an anxiety disorder, a stress-induced fear circuitry disorder, an internalizing disorder, or a trauma and stressor-related disorder. Then, ASD, AD, and DD are considered from a similar perspective. Evidence is examined pro and con, and a conclsion is offered recommending inclusion of this cluster of disorders in a section entitled "Trauma and Stressor-Related Disorders." The recommendation to shift ASD and PTSD out of the anxiety disorders section reflects increased recognition of trauma as a precipitant, emphasizing common etiology over common phenomenology. Similar considerations are addressed with regard to AD and DD.
这篇综述探讨了在 DSM-5 中专门用于应激和创伤异常反应的章节中,是否应该将一组障碍(包括适应障碍、急性应激障碍、创伤后应激障碍和分离性障碍)聚类在一起。环境风险因素,包括个体的发展经历,因此将成为主要的诊断考虑因素。本文还检查了这些障碍之间的关系以及它们与其他焦虑障碍的关系,以确定它们是否更好地归类为焦虑障碍或新的特定创伤和应激相关障碍分组。首先,回顾了自 DSM-III 以来应激反应的分类方式。主要重点是创伤后应激障碍,因为它受到了最多的关注,涉及到其在精神障碍诊断中的正确位置。本文讨论了 PTSD 是否应被视为焦虑障碍、应激引起的恐惧回路障碍、内化障碍或创伤和应激相关障碍。然后,从类似的角度考虑了 ASD、AD 和 DD。本文从正反两方面检查了证据,并提出了将这组障碍纳入题为“创伤和应激相关障碍”的章节的建议。将 ASD 和 PTSD 从焦虑障碍部分转移的建议反映了人们越来越认识到创伤是一个促成因素,强调了共同的病因而不是共同的表现。对 AD 和 DD 也考虑了类似的考虑因素。