Suppr超能文献

急性下消化道出血外科住院患者的预后预测因素。

Outcome predictors in acute surgical admissions for lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Chelsea & Westminster NHS Hospital Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2012 Aug;14(8):1020-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02824.x.

Abstract

AIM

The BLEED criterion is a triaging model for lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB), which was developed and validated in the USA. We assessed the BLEED criteria in a UK population and aimed to elucidate factors that can be implemented for early risk stratification.

METHOD

Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained surgical admission database at a central London teaching hospital. Data were collected on 26 clinical factors available on initial presentation. The primary-outcome end-points included severe bleeding (persistent bleeding within the first 24 h, blood transfusion, a decrease in haematocrit of ≥ 20% or recurrent bleeding after ≥ 24 hours of stability) and adverse outcome (emergency surgery to control bleeding, intensive care unit [ITU] admission or death).

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-four clinical episodes were identified, representing 3% of all surgical referrals. Twelve patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding were excluded. Severe bleeding occurred in 110 (64%) patients. An adverse outcome was recorded in 20 (11.6%) patients, and 10 (5.4%) patients died during admission. The commonest aetiologies were diverticular disease, haemorrhoids and malignancy. Four prognosticators of adverse outcome were identified, these being: creatinine > 150 μm (P = 0.002); age > 60 years (P = 0.001); abnormal haemodynamic parameters on presentation (P = 0.05); persistent bleeding within the first 24 h (P = 0.05); and area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) = 0.79. The BLEED criteria were shown to be nonpredictive (AUC = 0.60).

CONCLUSION

The BLEED criterion was not shown to have any predictive value in this patient cohort. Our study has determined an independent set of prognostic factors that could be incorporated into initial triaging of patients presenting with LGIB. This may facilitate the early identification of patients requiring more aggressive resuscitation, admission to a monitored bed and consideration for early radiological or surgical intervention.

摘要

目的

BLEED 标准是一种用于下消化道出血(LGIB)的分诊模型,该模型在美国开发并得到验证。我们评估了英国人群中的 BLEED 标准,并旨在阐明可用于早期风险分层的因素。

方法

从伦敦市中心教学医院的前瞻性维持手术入院数据库中确定患者。收集了在初始表现时可获得的 26 个临床因素的数据。主要终点包括严重出血(最初 24 小时内持续出血、输血、血细胞比容下降≥20%或稳定后≥24 小时再次出血)和不良结局(控制出血的紧急手术、重症监护病房[ITU]入院或死亡)。

结果

确定了 184 个临床发作,占所有手术转诊的 3%。排除了 12 例上消化道出血患者。110 例(64%)患者发生严重出血。记录了 20 例(11.6%)不良结局,10 例(5.4%)患者在住院期间死亡。最常见的病因是憩室疾病、痔疮和恶性肿瘤。确定了 4 个不良结局的预后因素,这些因素是:肌酐>150 μm(P=0.002);年龄>60 岁(P=0.001);初始表现时血流动力学参数异常(P=0.05);最初 24 小时内持续出血(P=0.05);和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)=0.79。BLEED 标准被证明没有预测价值(AUC=0.60)。

结论

BLEED 标准在本患者队列中没有显示出任何预测价值。我们的研究确定了一组独立的预后因素,这些因素可纳入 LGIB 患者的初始分诊中。这可能有助于早期识别需要更积极复苏、入住监测病床以及考虑早期放射或手术干预的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验